Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 97
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Capper (60)
cereus (73)
Mcanderson (43)


Next birthdays
11/06 dan (37)
11/06 rchydro (64)
11/06 CapRack (30)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

MIT camera takes 3 trillion frames/second

1 2 
Move Thread LAN_403
IamSmooth
Mon Dec 19 2011, 02:12AM Print
IamSmooth Registered Member #190 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 12:00AM
Location:
Posts: 1567
Does anyone know how this camera works?
Back to top
magnet18
Mon Dec 19 2011, 04:04AM
magnet18 Registered Member #3766 Joined: Sun Mar 20 2011, 05:39AM
Location: 1307912312 3766 FT117575 Indiana State
Posts: 624
I saw that, it actually captures light moving!
No idea how it works, but my mind was blown!

[EDIT]
answer- Link2
Back to top
Mads Barnkob
Mon Dec 19 2011, 08:59AM
Mads Barnkob Registered Member #1403 Joined: Tue Mar 18 2008, 06:05PM
Location: Denmark, Odense C
Posts: 1968
This is already discussed in this thread: Link2
Back to top
Platinum
Mon Dec 19 2011, 09:05AM
Platinum Registered Member #3926 Joined: Fri Jun 03 2011, 08:32PM
Location: UK.
Posts: 525
The guy talks with professionalism.
Back to top
Steve Conner
Mon Dec 19 2011, 10:39AM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
MIT published a few papers on it, and they're available for download from the MIT group site.

To cut a long story short, they cheated. The light is a very accurately timed and short pulse from a Ti:sapphire laser. They shoot it over and over, capturing the scene with a streak camera and probably integrating a lot of shots. The streak camera produces a 2-D image, which represents how one vertical line of the scene changes throughout the movie. Then they move a mirror slightly to capture the next scanline of the scene and do it again.

So, it shoots 3 trillion FPS but takes a day to make a 5 second movie, and they call this progress! tongue
Back to top
Patrick
Mon Dec 19 2011, 10:50PM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
If we wanted to see how a high expolsive blast wave propagates through a hardened stainless steel rod, their camera would be useless, right?

Cheating i say!
Back to top
IamSmooth
Tue Dec 20 2011, 02:55AM
IamSmooth Registered Member #190 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 12:00AM
Location:
Posts: 1567
Yes, I read the link and can see that it is not exactly what I thought. I was hoping that if it truely could capture 3trill with one sitting, then maybe one could observe what happens when light hits a slit and follow the photon, seeing how it behaves as a wave or particle. But if it has to be done over and over, this will not help.
Back to top
magnet18
Tue Dec 20 2011, 07:15PM
magnet18 Registered Member #3766 Joined: Sun Mar 20 2011, 05:39AM
Location: 1307912312 3766 FT117575 Indiana State
Posts: 624
Steve Conner wrote ...

MIT published a few papers on it, and they're available for download from the MIT group site.

To cut a long story short, they cheated. The light is a very accurately timed and short pulse from a Ti:sapphire laser. They shoot it over and over, capturing the scene with a streak camera and probably integrating a lot of shots. The streak camera produces a 2-D image, which represents how one vertical line of the scene changes throughout the movie. Then they move a mirror slightly to capture the next scanline of the scene and do it again.

So, it shoots 3 trillion FPS but takes a day to make a 5 second movie, and they call this progress! tongue



You don't call it progress? Has anyone else ever watched light move in a video? It might not be useful for something high explosive, but for anything involving light or lasers it can me quite useful.

the fact that it needs to scan multiple times is irrelevant to the double slit experiment, as this will only see photons directed towards the camera. A single photon wouldn't show up anyway.

(also, I think you meant 1-D)
Back to top
Patrick
Tue Dec 20 2011, 08:33PM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
magnet18 wrote ...

Steve Conner wrote ...

MIT published a few papers on it, and they're available for download from the MIT group site.

To cut a long story short, they cheated. The light is a very accurately timed and short pulse from a Ti:sapphire laser. They shoot it over and over, capturing the scene with a streak camera and probably integrating a lot of shots. The streak camera produces a 2-D image, which represents how one vertical line of the scene changes throughout the movie. Then they move a mirror slightly to capture the next scanline of the scene and do it again.

So, it shoots 3 trillion FPS but takes a day to make a 5 second movie, and they call this progress! tongue



You don't call it progress? Has anyone else ever watched light move in a video? It might not be useful for something high explosive, but for anything involving light or lasers it can me quite useful.

the fact that it needs to scan multiple times is irrelevant to the double slit experiment, as this will only see photons directed towards the camera. A single photon wouldn't show up anyway.

(also, I think you meant 1-D)
Im sure it has its usefullness, but not as advertised in the way everyone thinks of "X frames per second" as a speed for cameras.
Back to top
Steve Conner
Wed Dec 21 2011, 07:50AM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
No, I meant 2-D. The streak camera images a 1-D "line" of the scene, and sweeps it across a screen like an oscilloscope. So it produces a 2-D image where one of the dimensions is space and the other is time.
Back to top
1 2 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.