Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 53
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
Th3_uN1Qu3 (33)


Next birthdays
06/17 Th3_uN1Qu3 (33)
06/19 sio2 (50)
06/20 Sparrow338 (35)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Electromagnetic Radiation
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

SWR Meter Toroid and Component Selection

Move Thread LAN_403
Dr. Who
Thu Dec 08 2011, 07:54PM Print
Dr. Who Registered Member #326 Joined: Sat Mar 18 2006, 01:12PM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 66
I'm attempting to build a standing-wave ration (SWR) meter for use in the 50 ohm feedline of my amateur radio HF antenna. Frequency range will be 1-30 MHz and power up to 150W. Many commercial manual and automatic antenna tuners use a SWR measurement circuit similar to this:


1323373937 326 FT0 Mfj Swr Circuit


A short section of thick solid wire carrying the RF signal passes through the centre of a ferrite toroid. It's clear that the seccondary windings sample a small amount of the RF current, and the forward and reverse currents are half-wave rectified, smoothed/filtered and then driving the microammeter.

What I'm not clear about is toroid selection. The usual rule as far as I understand is that the turns ratio and core material are chosen such the the winding inductance has around 4x the impedance of the circuitry which drives/loads it. I'm not clear how to apply this to the line carrying the RF to my antenna. I'm also not totally clear about the function of the capacitors, inductor and resistor connected to the centre tap.

Frustratingly the various textbooks and websites give examples of specific SWR meter circuits, rather than explaining how to design one.

Back to top
Steve Conner
Thu Dec 08 2011, 09:38PM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
This circuit was invented by Warren Bruene of Collins Radio in 1959. I remember it well, I was complaining about the weather on 80m at the time. Here's his original article...
Link2

It recommends "60 turns of No. 30 wire on a carbonyl E core". Carbonyl is the low permeability, low loss ferrite grade intended for RF work, not the stuff we all use in our switchmode power transformers.
Back to top
GeordieBoy
Thu Dec 08 2011, 10:27PM
GeordieBoy Registered Member #1232 Joined: Wed Jan 16 2008, 10:53PM
Location: Doon tha Toon!
Posts: 881
Carbonyl may refer to Iron-Carbonyl which is a grade of iron-powder. For example micrometals iron-powder core type-2 (red/clear) is known as a carbonyl core. These show lower high-frequency losses (and lower permeability as Steve said) than the more common Hydrogen reduced iron powder cores.

Carbonyl iron powder is typically used in RF power transformers, matching networks and RFCs where the AC flux excursion is large and you don't need that much inductance.

Hydrogen reduced iron powder is typically used for buck and boost chokes in Switched-mode power supplies in the 10's and low 100's of kHz. Inductance is typically larger and AC flux excursion is lower because ripple current is limited by design in SMPSUs.

I suspect that the differences between the two grades of material is that the grain size of iron-powder produced by the carbonyl iron process is smaller than that produced by the hydrogen reduced method? Can anyone confirm this?

-Richie,
Back to top
Dr. Who
Fri Dec 09 2011, 11:16PM
Dr. Who Registered Member #326 Joined: Sat Mar 18 2006, 01:12PM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 66
Thanks folks. It's a shame so few amateur radio books and magazines achieve anwhere near that sort of quality nowadays.
Back to top
Proud Mary
Sat Dec 10 2011, 12:03AM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
There's no need to use a toroid at all if you don't want to.

You can adjust your antenna system at low power using a simple wideband resistive bridge, as there is no need to monitor SWR constantly during transmission.

Using low inductance carbon resistors, the resistive bridge has a far greater frequency range than any toroidal or 'monimatch' SWR metering system.

Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.