Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 68
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Capper (60)
cereus (73)
Mcanderson (43)


Next birthdays
11/06 dan (37)
11/06 rchydro (64)
11/06 CapRack (30)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

how to solve a 3D resistor cube?

Move Thread LAN_403
haxor5354
Fri Oct 14 2011, 11:36PM Print
haxor5354 Registered Member #2063 Joined: Sat Apr 04 2009, 03:16PM
Location: Toronto
Posts: 352
so my physics teacher thought it would be funny to give us a hard question just to make us feel dumb.
12 resistors have the same resistance of R ohms each.
a 3D cube is constructed with those resistors, find the equation for resistance across any 2 diagonaly oposite corners.
after getting mind blown for an hour after school i decided to build my own resistor cube and measure the resistance my self :)
I thought it would just be 3 resistors in a series string, then 6 string in parallel. but turns out that wasn't the correct answer.


the resistors I used were 220K each and the resistance across a diagonally opposite corner is 180K :(
773
Back to top
kimbomba
Fri Oct 14 2011, 11:50PM
kimbomba Registered Member #3854 Joined: Fri Apr 29 2011, 03:45AM
Location: Mexico
Posts: 95
One way to solve it is adding a battery and using kirchoff's laws, just google it.
Back to top
klugesmith
Sat Oct 15 2011, 12:10AM
klugesmith Registered Member #2099 Joined: Wed Apr 29 2009, 12:22AM
Location: Los Altos, California
Posts: 1716
I applaud your experimental approach.
And generally take a dim view of analytic solutions to interesting problems
that aren't verified empirically, in cases where doing the latter is easy and fun.

The trick for solving this class of problems (like infinite grids of resistors) is to look for symmetry.

In the cube case, by symmetry, the three intermediate nodes
adjacent to the start node must be at the same potential, call it A.
So they could be shorted together, without changing any R currents or node voltages.

And the other three intermediate nodes, all adjacent to the end node,
are at another common potential, call it B. So -they- could be shorted.

From start to A we have 3 R's in parallel, equivalent to R/3.
From A to B we have 6 R's in parallel, equivalent to R/6.
From B to end we have 3 R's in parallel, equivalent to R/3.
Total between opposite corners of cube = 5R/6.

Please give credit to the Internet if you present this to your physics teacher
without having thought of it independently.

[edit] and for extra fun: connect a voltage source between the opposite corners
and measure voltage across various R's.
What percentage will be across the R's adjacent to start and end points?
What percentage will be across the middle rank of R's?
What are the individual resistor currents, with respect to total current?
Back to top
AleSeg
Sat Oct 15 2011, 11:23PM
AleSeg Registered Member #2727 Joined: Tue Mar 09 2010, 02:39PM
Location: Montevideo - Uruguay
Posts: 33
Te right answer is:
2.5*R/3
then the meter reading is nominally 183.3333...
Anyway, you must do the resolution by yourself 8)

See you
Back to top
klugesmith
Mon Oct 17 2011, 05:30PM
klugesmith Registered Member #2099 Joined: Wed Apr 29 2009, 12:22AM
Location: Los Altos, California
Posts: 1716
For better empirical accuracy, you might want to measure some of your left-over resistors from the same batch, to see if they are consistently a little below their nominal value.

Since you already made the cube, you can check a couple of other simple exercises.
1. resistance between adjacent nodes.
2. resistance between nodes separated by 2 resistors

Symmetry makes their solutions particularly easy. Not as trivial as the cube-diagonal case,
but no calculator is needed. Do you measure (or figure) around 128 K for case 1, and 165 K for case 2?
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.