Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 68
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
Th3_uN1Qu3 (33)


Next birthdays
06/17 Th3_uN1Qu3 (33)
06/19 sio2 (50)
06/20 Sparrow338 (35)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Electromagnetic Radiation
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Neutrino physics

Move Thread LAN_403
Conundrum
Tue Sept 27 2011, 08:45AM Print
Conundrum Registered Member #96 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:37PM
Location: CI, Earth
Posts: 4059
Hi all.

As you might have heard on the news, it seems that scientists at CERN have possibly discovered that neutrinos can travel
faster than the speed of light; the delay quoted is 60 nsec over the distance measured +/- 10 nsec.

If this result is proven elsewhere it could shake the very foundations of physics.

One fly in the ointment is that SN1987A's neutrinos were only delayed by an hour which does not tally with these new results.
The quoted explanation is that the neutrinos emitted in CERN's experiment are different to the ones from a supernova.
This makes little sense as supernovas are one of the most energetic events in the Universe.
SN1987A had around a 3 hour delay between the neutrino burst and the "first light" whereas nearly a five year delay would be expected if the neutrinos were travelling faster than light for all of that time.

I propose a different explanation.
The concept here is that the FTL neutrinos possess so much energy that they change type into a fourth neutrino type called the Omega, and then quantum mechanically tunnel into a higher dimension.
This allows them to traverse a substantial distance at essentially infinite velocity before changing type back into an electron, muon or tau neutrino, dropping back into normal spacetime and being observed.
While doing this the surrounding spacetime exerts a drag force on the neutrinos which means that each jump is shorter and shorter until they stay as conventional neutrinos.

Best analogy here is that they are skipping like stones across a pond; the water is acting like normal spacetime whereas the air is the higher dimension.

Confirmation or refutal of this theory would be by observing another nearby similar type supernova and measuring the neutrino delay.
If correct then the delay between neutrinos and photons/gamma rays should be the same at any distance.

Comments?

-A
Back to top
testtest
Wed Sept 28 2011, 11:05PM
testtest Registered Member #3271 Joined: Mon Oct 04 2010, 02:29AM
Location: Canada
Posts: 159
Or the issue, as someone pointed out at coffee this morning, is that we almost always measure the speed of "light" with light or photons (gamma or otherwise). Due to the index of refraction even one hydrogen atom per cubic meter in space does have a slowing effect on "c" with light (extended quantum wavefunction as found in the concept of entagledment) That would result in "c" being actually slightly larger than we always measured it with photons but neutrinos (or a combination of flavors) travels closer to the true "c"? Or if string theory is right neutrinos access more dimensions of space and thus travel a smaller distance than we measure.... both are equivalent. Paper from the group does look thourough at first read. Facinating!
Back to top
jnbrex
Thu Sept 29 2011, 02:51AM
jnbrex Registered Member #3950 Joined: Wed Jun 15 2011, 12:45AM
Location:
Posts: 51
Richnormand, I agree that hydrogen atoms could slow the light, but we have a very precise value for the speed of light in a vacuum. And I'm pretty sure one hydrogen atom per cubic meter would not even come CLOSE to slowing the speed of light nearly enough for the speed of the neutrinos to be moving at the "true" speed of light.
That said, I still believe that the CERN experiment is more likely a measurement error than a true violation of special relativity.
Back to top
testtest
Thu Sept 29 2011, 11:47PM
testtest Registered Member #3271 Joined: Mon Oct 04 2010, 02:29AM
Location: Canada
Posts: 159
you might be interested in this article and the discussion attached. Will be interesting to "see" where that goes....

Link2
Back to top
Ash Small
Tue Oct 04 2011, 11:01AM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
It seems I'm unable to access that link for some reason, Rich.

However, my thoughts on this subject are along the following lines:

The velocity of photons changes depending on the medium (or their interaction with matter),

The 'mass' of neutrinos changes depending on the medium (or their interaction with matter)

This fundamental difference between photons and neutrinos 'may' explain the observed phenomena.

They are both 'massless' in a vacuum, and both have the same velocity in a vacuum, but the presence of matter will slow the photons, but not the neutrinos, and space isn't a 'true' vacuum, also, the mountains they passed through in the CERN experiment won't slow the neutrinos.)

(I still haven't ruled out 'experimental error', though)
Back to top
testtest
Thu Oct 06 2011, 11:42PM
testtest Registered Member #3271 Joined: Mon Oct 04 2010, 02:29AM
Location: Canada
Posts: 159
managed to use the link from three different computers at three different locations (different ISP and IP address) with no issues. Sorry you had a problem with the link. Sent you the link separately via the forum mail, that might work for you....
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.