Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 74
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Capper (60)
cereus (73)
Mcanderson (43)


Next birthdays
11/06 dan (37)
11/06 rchydro (64)
11/06 CapRack (30)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Discrete gate driver

1 2 
Move Thread LAN_403
Daedronus
Mon Sept 26 2011, 10:10PM Print
Daedronus Registered Member #2329 Joined: Tue Sept 01 2009, 08:25AM
Location:
Posts: 370
I always wandered how cheap pnp-npn totem poles would do compared to a dedicated gate driver IC, like the TC4420CPA.
So, I finally got around to try it, and this is what I got so far

The mosfets are not powered,

First, the TC4420CPA, no gate resistance used:

Driving a irfp250:
Th
Th

Driving a irf510:
Th
Th

Now, a BD681 + BD682 totem pole, the base resistance of the totem pole is 270ohm, no gate resistance used:

Driving a irfp250:
Th
Th

Driving a irf510:
Th
Th


So, what do you think?

Edit: My bad, the big mosfet is irfp250, not irfp260

Back to top
Forty
Mon Sept 26 2011, 10:20PM
Forty Registered Member #3888 Joined: Sun May 15 2011, 09:50PM
Location: Erie, PA
Posts: 649
is the totem pole doing a better job on the irf510 than the ic is? I don't imagine that ringing from the ic being too good for the gate (but you could probably remedy that with a capacitor)
Back to top
lightlinked
Tue Sept 27 2011, 03:04AM
lightlinked Registered Member #2087 Joined: Tue Apr 21 2009, 08:32AM
Location:
Posts: 115
can you compute the rise and fall times with the scope data? the mosfet should be powered since the gate capacitance will change.
Back to top
Daedronus
Tue Sept 27 2011, 05:50AM
Daedronus Registered Member #2329 Joined: Tue Sept 01 2009, 08:25AM
Location:
Posts: 370
yes. but since they are underpowered in both cases it should help get a idea how it compares to the driver IC
Back to top
klugesmith
Tue Sept 27 2011, 03:27PM
klugesmith Registered Member #2099 Joined: Wed Apr 29 2009, 12:22AM
Location: Los Altos, California
Posts: 1716
Great experiment; thanks for sharing the scope pictures.

By the way, as one of those annoyingly wonderful complexities of the English language:
Discreet and discrete are two different words with the same pronunciation.
The latter is the right one for this thread's title.
Link2

Also, newbies should note that the term "totem pole" correctly refers to
both the pair of bipolar transistors, and to the TC4420CPA's output stage.
Link2
Back to top
Electra
Tue Sept 27 2011, 09:48PM
Electra Registered Member #816 Joined: Sun Jun 03 2007, 07:29PM
Location:
Posts: 156
Are you using your transistors connected emitter to emitter? The only reason I say is these are Darlington’s so you will have 2x base emitter voltage drops, probably not a problem for the +ve rise, but for turn off if your only using a 0v rail it can only pull down to 1.2v till the gate capacitance has discharged.

The gate drive Ic’s also accept logic level inputs which is convenient as you don’t have to add a voltage level shifter.

To be fair if you can build discrete circuits that work equally well, I think that makes you a better designer, as with a lot IC’s made for a specific purpose, so many people just automatically choose to use them, rather than try and understand alternative ways it can be done.
Back to top
lightlinked
Wed Sept 28 2011, 01:44AM
lightlinked Registered Member #2087 Joined: Tue Apr 21 2009, 08:32AM
Location:
Posts: 115
the IC is one part vs multiple. it really just comes down to choosing what best suits your application. for us tinkerers if you blow up a discrete driver you will probably just need to replace the totem pole rather than what can be an expensive IC. a cool thing we could do as a community is come up with some open hardware driver designs. I'm thinking of trying out a hybrid, driver IC with external totem pole
Back to top
Daedronus
Wed Sept 28 2011, 05:43AM
Daedronus Registered Member #2329 Joined: Tue Sept 01 2009, 08:25AM
Location:
Posts: 370
I will try different pnp + npn transistors later and post the waveforms.
And if I can get some small signals mosfets I will also try them, since 4A 30V mosfets have minuscule gate capacitance, but they can source sink a lot of current in pulses.

For me the problem with dedicated ICs is that, I have about 10 TC4420 but 100 of the bd681/682, and they costed less.

Switching from signal levels (0-5v) to 0-15v should not be too hard, two R + npn inverters, or just one if you don't mind the inverted signal.
Back to top
Pinky's Brain
Wed Sept 28 2011, 05:32PM
Pinky's Brain Registered Member #2901 Joined: Thu Jun 03 2010, 01:25PM
Location:
Posts: 837
Why use a BJT totempole rather than a MOSFET one?
Back to top
mzincali
Fri Oct 14 2011, 07:09PM
mzincali Registered Member #4127 Joined: Fri Oct 07 2011, 05:40PM
Location:
Posts: 22
Hi Daedronus,

Do you have a circuit schematic for the totem pole you used that you could share with us? Also, did you have any luck with other npn+pnp combinations?

thx!
Back to top
1 2 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.