Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 56
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Capper (60)
cereus (73)
Mcanderson (43)


Next birthdays
11/06 dan (37)
11/06 rchydro (64)
11/06 CapRack (30)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Protecting a Signal Generator while Driving Transistors.

1 2 3 4  last
Move Thread LAN_403
Ash Small
Thu Jul 21 2011, 07:31PM Print
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
I'm planning on blowing up some 2N3055's while driving them using a signal generator and I thought I ought to take some measures to protect the sig gen from shorted transistors,etc.

Will this work?

The circuit on the left is what I have been using, my proposed modifications are on the right.


1311276716 3414 FT0 Driver


I was going to establish the values of the resistors and capacitors by trial and error, increasing the resistance and decreasing the capacitance until performance is affected, but might try some maths first, to try to get an idea of values.

the additional transistor (2SD2493) has a gain of 5000 and max. frequency of 60 mHz, so should be up to the job. Data sheet here:

Link2

I'll be driving the circuit at about 20-30 kHz.

EDIT: there is a MISPRINT in the schematics. The capacitance of the capacitor across the 2N3055 is 0.56 uF, I think (not 560 F). (The diode across it was 4 A I think, but I might increase the value when I increase the current)
Back to top
Proud Mary
Thu Jul 21 2011, 11:39PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Even 560 μF looks large to me, Ash.
Back to top
Ash Small
Thu Jul 21 2011, 11:53PM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
Proud Mary wrote ...

Even 560 μF looks large to me, Ash.

It's around 500 something. I've not measured it tonight, but it's of the order that I was advised on here (when I was asking how to protect the 2N3055 from voltage spikes), and that is in previous threads on 4HV. I'll do some research in the morning, but whatever the units are, it's what I was advised to use.

I know I should have checked, but, once I found that extra transistor (2SD2493) in my 'parts bin' ( from a Toshiba TV I stripped recently) I wanted to know if the basic principle would work. (In my haste I mistakenly posted 560 F, which is obviously wrong).

Whatever the units are, I think I was advised to use 'around 470'. The closest I had was 560)
Back to top
Proud Mary
Fri Jul 22 2011, 12:13AM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Ash Small wrote ...

Proud Mary wrote ...

Even 560 μF looks large to me, Ash.

It's around 500 something. I've not measured it tonight, but it's of the order that I was advised on here (when I was asking how to protect the 2N3055 from voltage spikes), and that is in previous threads on 4HV. I'll do some research in the morning, but whatever the units are, it's what I was advised to use.

I know I should have checked, but, once I found that extra transistor (2SD2493) in my 'parts bin' ( from a Toshiba TV I stripped recently) I wanted to know if the basic principle would work. (In my haste I mistakenly posted 560 F, which is obviously wrong).

Whatever the units are, I think I was advised to use 'around 470'. The closest I had was 560)

I think 'around 470' nF (i.e. 0.47 μF) is a much more likely value - in fact, I'm not sure the circuit could be made to work at all with a big fat 470 μF 200V aluminium electrolytic stuck fast on it like a boiled pig's trotter stuck to a plate of pork jelly.
Back to top
Ash Small
Fri Jul 22 2011, 12:22AM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
Proud Mary wrote ...

.
I think 'around 470' nF (i.e. 0.47 μF) is a much more likely value - in fact, I'm not sure the circuit could be made to work at all with a big fat 470 uF 200V aluminium electrolytic stuck fast on it like a boiled pig's trotter stuck to a plate.


It's not an electrolytic, I think it's a foil cap of some sort. I'll post more details in the morning.

I was limiting current to 4 amps at the time, to protect the signal generator, because I knew the transistor wouldn't blow at that current. I'm planning to blow some transistors, to establish how much power they will take, so I want to add some protection for the sig. gen.
Back to top
Proud Mary
Fri Jul 22 2011, 12:37AM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Ash Small wrote ...

Proud Mary wrote ...

.
I think 'around 470' nF (i.e. 0.47 μF) is a much more likely value - in fact, I'm not sure the circuit could be made to work at all with a big fat 470 uF 200V aluminium electrolytic stuck fast on it like a boiled pig's trotter stuck to a plate of cold pork jelly.


It's not an electrolytic, I think it's a foil cap of some sort. I'll post more details in the morning.

I was limiting current to 4 amps at the time, to protect the signal generator, because I knew the transistor wouldn't blow at that current. I'm planning to blow some transistors, to establish how much power they will take, so I want to add some protection for the sig. gen.

How about a nice TVS diode?
Back to top
Ash Small
Fri Jul 22 2011, 12:44AM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
Proud Mary wrote ...

.
How about a nice TVS diode?

I don't have any TVS diodes in my parts bin. I'm impatient, and I don't like paying RS prices or waiting for stuff from Ebay.

Will my design work? If not, why not?

When I 'get around' to ordering some more stuff from RS I'll make sure I get some good TVS diodes.

EDIT: I might add TVS diodes to the above circuit for 'additional protection'.
Back to top
Inducktion
Fri Jul 22 2011, 03:05AM
Inducktion Registered Member #3637 Joined: Fri Jan 21 2011, 11:07PM
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 1068
Why not use an optoisolator?
Back to top
Mads Barnkob
Fri Jul 22 2011, 08:49AM
Mads Barnkob Registered Member #1403 Joined: Tue Mar 18 2008, 06:05PM
Location: Denmark, Odense C
Posts: 1968
Inducktion wrote ...

Why not use an optoisolator?


The question must be "Why over complicate things?"

Why spend time figuring out a protection circuit for your precious signal generator that you want to use to drive some 2n3055 transistors into oblivion.

Use a simple 555 or TL494 oscilator and get blowing up stuff right away.
Back to top
Ash Small
Fri Jul 22 2011, 11:05AM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
Proud Mary wrote ...

.
I think 'around 470' nF (i.e. 0.47 μF) is a much more likely value .

You are correct, as usual, PM. Values were taken for Dr. Kilovolt's schematic in this thread:

Link2

A TVS and opto-isolator in addition to the series capacitors and resistors would probably provide complete protection if my understanding is correct. possibly with an additional resistor across the output of the sig. gen.

I assume that the diode and capacitor across the 2N3055 should prevent the ground rail from going positive, so maybe the capacitor and resistor on the return to the sig. gen are unnessesary, and maybe I only need a zener instead of a TVS, but the way I see it, the more protection the better.

Even if I was to use a 555 or something instead of the sig. gen. I'd still want some protection.

The basic concept here is that by using a transistor with a gain of 5000 I can block excess current from getting to the sig. gen, (through the series capacitors and resistors) in the event of a failure when running this off a car battery, and the diode and capacitor across the 2N3055 should take care of voltage spikes. If this is the case then my proposed circuit above should provide protection. (probably just one capacitor and resistor is needed, between the output of the sig. gen. and the 5000 Hfe transistor?)

A TVS across the sig.gen. should provide additional protection in the event of failure of the freewheeling diode. Is my understanding correct?
Back to top
1 2 3 4  last

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.