Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 67
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Ian (36)
Lucas (39)


Next birthdays
01/31 Mathias (41)
01/31 slash128v6 (52)
02/01 Barry (70)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Electromagnetic Projectile Accelerators
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Inductive storage unswitched coilgun

Move Thread LAN_403
Jack A
Thu May 26 2011, 08:20AM Print
Jack A Registered Member #2975 Joined: Wed Jul 07 2010, 12:19AM
Location:
Posts: 28
Hi all!
I went back and thought about what you all said about the possibility of an inductive power source.
I came up with what I think is an interesting new idea and hopefully a fulfilling DIY project.
My idea is to have a coil that is very long with only one layer, but the end is a short section of around 10 layers. So that the 'Magnetic centre' is in this chunky section.
The idea is that the main coil is powered up until it is storing enough energy, then the projectile is injected. The hope is that either:
1. All of the energy is used before the end is reached.
2. As was originally planned, some of the energy is used, but the coil is still charged and the fact that the coil is stacked means that the pullback is minimal.
What do you guys think?
Thankyou for any comments,
Jack Allison
Back to top
Shrad
Thu May 26 2011, 09:38AM
Shrad Registered Member #3215 Joined: Sun Sept 19 2010, 08:42PM
Location:
Posts: 780
I'd say that if you can somehow make your projectile short the coil (be one of the terminals) while moving freely would compress the magnetic pulse as it reaches the end, and accelerate exponentially

the end of the coil would need to sustain enormous amounts of current, but the pulse doesn't have that fast

the greatest difficulty is to make the projectile a terminal for the coil, so you would need to make a kind of moving bed for it with a slit along the rail for shorting the coil, which would be variac-style with a connecting brush (coil unisolated in the path of the brush)
Back to top
Jack A
Thu May 26 2011, 10:30AM
Jack A Registered Member #2975 Joined: Wed Jul 07 2010, 12:19AM
Location:
Posts: 28
I think I understand what you mean, it is also a very interesting idea and well worth exploring.
Your post also made me think of another idea, what is the projectile was on rails that completed the coil circuit, so when they end the coil will instantly deactivate. Here is a cross-section:
Crossection

The grey area is the barrel tubing, the brown is the rails, the blue the projectile, and red is the coil. The pojectile is pulled onto the rails by the magnetic field.

So, do you guys think variably layered coils could work?
Back to top
Forty
Thu May 26 2011, 04:10PM
Forty Registered Member #3888 Joined: Sun May 15 2011, 09:50PM
Location: Erie, PA
Posts: 649
so you'd need a segmented rail then, right? with one segment per wire/coil region.
i think shrad was on to something there with the variac brush approach. how about instead of the moving sled, have your brush be a long bar or stick of graphite (with a couple small springs on the other side.) then you could have this brush rail be opposite the uninsolated coil.
Back to top
Shrad
Thu May 26 2011, 08:57PM
Shrad Registered Member #3215 Joined: Sun Sept 19 2010, 08:42PM
Location:
Posts: 780
I think the most reliable way to do that would be combining a coilgun with a railgun, but one rail would be segmented and each segment connected to an equal portion of the coil (or sections exponentially smaller, or again in a fibonacci arrangement...)

if someone gets something done with the principle, please tell me I'm curious ;)

but beware of the EM pulse generated

EMP were, back in time, generated by a big capacitor discharging in a big coil, where you had a fusing cylindrical core lit by the pulse... combustion speed was carefully chosen to be synchronous with the discharge propagation delay through the coil, so each unit of distance burnt on the core shorted the equal distance of coil, compressing the magnetic pulse t o get a massive EM pulse at the end (I can guarantee you that even a shielded computer couldn't whitstand it)
Back to top
Forty
Thu May 26 2011, 09:11PM
Forty Registered Member #3888 Joined: Sun May 15 2011, 09:50PM
Location: Erie, PA
Posts: 649
fibonacci gun. someone do it!
Back to top
Jack A
Fri May 27 2011, 04:26AM
Jack A Registered Member #2975 Joined: Wed Jul 07 2010, 12:19AM
Location:
Posts: 28
fibonacci gun. someone do it!
Sounds epic, please give a link or eleborate.
Back to top
Shrad
Fri May 27 2011, 06:58AM
Shrad Registered Member #3215 Joined: Sun Sept 19 2010, 08:42PM
Location:
Posts: 780
length of coils going from long to short in a fibonacci sequence

like 13cm 8cm 5cm 3cm 2cm 1cm

I think that if you have each section of contact rail be half its coil length, it will accelerate the projectile in an exponential fashion

think of it as a self-triggered segmented coil gun if you have a capacitor for each coil and the segmented rail just connects capacitors to their coil in sequence, or fibonacci pulse compressed gun if the segmented rail shorts the coil linearly

the only problem I see is the magnetic center of each coil section would prevent the projectile to accelerate further than the coil segment it is in at the moment, so each turn of the coil would have to be shorted in sequence

anyway, the fibonacci sequence would be good for a segmented coil gun, as well as the self-triggering rail ^^
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.