Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 49
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Capper (60)
cereus (73)
Mcanderson (43)


Next birthdays
11/05 Capper (60)
11/05 cereus (73)
11/05 Mcanderson (43)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Is this battery configuration safe?

Move Thread LAN_403
Avi
Tue May 24 2011, 05:43PM Print
Avi Registered Member #580 Joined: Mon Mar 12 2007, 03:17PM
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 410
from the batteries perspective, is it safe to use these 5 3.7v 1.2Ah lipo cells if i connect them all in parallel for both discharge at 9A into this and to charge them at 1A by this.
I do specifically mean those ones at the ebay link to ensure they are the same, not 5 random ones i may have that are the same type as that link.

Is there any safety concern with the batteries if connected in parallel, with the above usage?

Separate question: I can't seem to find any datasheets for "CA148" so I wonder of the cells have any sort of inbuilt protection?
Back to top
Forty
Tue May 24 2011, 11:26PM
Forty Registered Member #3888 Joined: Sun May 15 2011, 09:50PM
Location: Erie, PA
Posts: 649
I don't have any experience with lipo cells yet, but, i don't think that there is anything to worry about with using batteries in parallel (assuming that they are the same.) The main issue with using multiple batteries is when they are placed in series, because they are not an ideal emf source and hence have an internal resistance. That resistance turns some of the energy flowing across the battery into heat, and if multiple batteries are in series, then the energy from the first must pass through the second, increasing the heat dissipated in the second. Too many batteries in series demonstrate the need for the "do not dispose of in fire" label.
If you have multiple batteries in parallel, and they have approximately the same internal resistance, then they should share the current passing through (well, being created by i guess) them evenly, resulting in the same amount of heat in a given battery as if it were connected by itself.
From what i have heard about lipo batteries, they can be fickle about charging and express their discontent via flames and toxic fumes, so i'd look into a charger especially designed for that type of battery.
Back to top
Electroholic
Wed May 25 2011, 02:21AM
Electroholic Registered Member #191 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 02:01AM
Location: Esbjerg Denmark
Posts: 720
It will be fine, the 5P module will be charged at 1/6C and discharged at 1.5C. However, you are going to need a circuit with a driver for the LED and a low cell voltage cutoff, between the cells and the led.
Back to top
Steve Conner
Wed May 25 2011, 09:48AM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
Yes, paralleling them is fine, just make sure they're all in the same state of charge before hooking them together for the first time, and then keep them together. (I have a 7.2V, 160 watt-hour "brick" of LiPos like this.)

The batteries have no internal protection: RC model ones never do because it gets in the way of the desired high current drain. So, your LED driver will need an undervoltage shut-down. (The RC models have it built into the speed controller.)

The charger should be fine, as it's designed for Li-Poly batteries, and that's what you've got.

All said and done, it'll be no more dangerous than driving a RC car with the same batteries.
Back to top
Avi
Wed May 25 2011, 05:06PM
Avi Registered Member #580 Joined: Mon Mar 12 2007, 03:17PM
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 410
Is there some trick with the shutdown? a simple comparator my trigger as the load is turned on (if i PWM it) or or may oscillate like wild as the battery drains
Back to top
ConKbot of Doom
Wed May 25 2011, 05:25PM
ConKbot of Doom Registered Member #509 Joined: Sat Feb 10 2007, 07:02AM
Location:
Posts: 329
Latching would be the best, a lot of hysteresis would work too. I.E. off at 2.7-2.8v (under load) and back on at 3.4V

3.4V open circuit in a Li-Po battery would have not much capacity left in it, so if it shuts off at 2.8 under load and recovers back to 3.2-3.3v it should stay off till you charge it.

But as stated, you need some sort of driver, and I dont know of any single Li-Ion cell SST-90 drivers, quick and dirty would be 24-25 AMC7135 chips in parallel. Power dissipation for those wouldnt be that bad since the Vf of the LED matches the Vf of the battery back fairly well, and their dropout voltage is fairly low for after it comes out of regulation.

If you would run a 2S pack, there are efficient buck drivers which would work for you, but you would still need a low voltage cut-off, and a balance tap to charge it how you would an RC-car pack.
Back to top
Nah
Wed May 25 2011, 07:23PM
Nah Registered Member #3567 Joined: Mon Jan 03 2011, 10:49PM
Location: USA, 1960s
Posts: 260
As Steve Siad, you might want to add a regulating circuit so that the batteries don't discharge into each other.
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.