Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 30
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Capper (60)
cereus (73)
Mcanderson (43)


Next birthdays
11/05 Capper (60)
11/05 cereus (73)
11/05 Mcanderson (43)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Extreme value analysis

Move Thread LAN_403
big5824
Tue May 17 2011, 04:49PM Print
big5824 Registered Member #1687 Joined: Tue Sept 09 2008, 08:47PM
Location: UK, Darlington
Posts: 240
Im currently working on an assignment for my EEE systems engineering module, in which iv ran into a few problems that the limited notes and email ignoring lecturer cant solve. The topic in question is using extreme value analysis to calculate the tolerance of the frequency cutoff of a low pass filter given its component tolerances, so f=1/2piRC.

The first question I have is should the resulting frequency tolerance be equal either way, such as +-10%? I ask because all my results seem to be coming out at something like +10% -8%, despite equal component tolerances.

This then leads on to my second problem, where I am asked to find a function for Δf using ΔR and ΔC (Δ meaning tolerance). The problem is that Δf changes depending on which extremes of ΔR and ΔC are taken like in the question above, meaning I cant see how Δf, ΔR and ΔC can be linked in an equation. The nearest I got is f=1⁄(2π*R(1±∆R)*C(1±∆C) ), but i dont see how I can continue from here to get Δf as a constant (eg ±∆f)

I hope I've explained the problem well enough, just ask if i havent :)

Oh and also, im pretty sure this is going to be a simple answer or something iv completely missed, so im asking you in advance not to rub it in too hard please :)
Back to top
radiotech
Tue May 17 2011, 05:34PM
radiotech Registered Member #2463 Joined: Wed Nov 11 2009, 03:49AM
Location:
Posts: 1546
Use a Schmoo curve.
Back to top
Steve Conner
Tue May 17 2011, 06:26PM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
I think the proper name for this is uncertainty analysis.

To get delta f, write your above equation twice. Once for the unperturbed value, which is just f= 1/(2 pi R C) and once for the perturbed value- f+ delta f = 1/(2 pi (R+ delta R) (C+ delta C))

Then subtract them to get delta f as a function of delta R and delta C. This is a continuous function, that will tell you delta f for any delta R and delta C you care to put in. So you can try positive and negative values of delta R and C to find the worst case delta f.

The other way to do it is use partial differentiation to find df/dR and df/dC, then compose the answers. You're assuming delta R is small compared to R, so second order terms like delta R delta C can be neglected, making the math far easier.

The common sense approach: R and C are multiplied together, so the worst case tolerance for frequency is twice the tolerance of the components. Eg, 5% components gives 10% frequency. (The derivative of x.x is 2x)

Radiotech is not mental, there is actually such a thing as a Schmoo plot, you can make one with the Monte Carlo option in any good circuit simulator.
Back to top
big5824
Tue May 17 2011, 11:00PM
big5824 Registered Member #1687 Joined: Tue Sept 09 2008, 08:47PM
Location: UK, Darlington
Posts: 240
I tried doing ∆f=1/2piRC - 1/2pi(R+∆R)(C+∆C), but i constantly keep ending up with R∆C and C∆R terms that i cannot get rid of, what am i missing?
Back to top
Steve Conner
Wed May 18 2011, 06:59AM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
If the tolerances are in percent, and you want an answer in percent, you should maybe be substituting deltaR/R and deltaC/C, and solving for delta f/f. Hopefully that'll get rid of the unwanted terms.

After all if a resistor changes by 5% then deltaR = 0.05R, or deltaR/R = 0.05
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.