Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 56
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Capper (60)
cereus (73)
Mcanderson (43)


Next birthdays
11/05 Capper (60)
11/05 cereus (73)
11/05 Mcanderson (43)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

cheap geiger counter?

1 2 
Move Thread LAN_403
Microwatt
Mon May 02 2011, 06:01AM Print
Microwatt Registered Member #3282 Joined: Wed Oct 06 2010, 05:01PM
Location:
Posts: 224
made from scintillator screen+ photodiode+ transistor+ lm311 comparator?
Back to top
tarakan2
Mon May 02 2011, 07:28AM
tarakan2 Registered Member #3859 Joined: Sun May 01 2011, 03:47PM
Location:
Posts: 179
no way
you will need to stand in the middle of a reactor for the light diode to pick something up

you are not counting the number of particles but measuring the intensity of the light produced by a flow of particles

unless you are inside focusima or chernobyl sarcophagus, that aint gona be useful
Back to top
Proud Mary
Mon May 02 2011, 09:37AM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Microwatt wrote ...

made from scintillator screen+ photodiode+ transistor+ lm311 comparator?

This type of circuit is employed in many professional instruments using PIN photodiodes, both with and without a scintillator, but a few words of explanation:

At 10 keV detection efficiency approaches 100%, a figure which falls to about 1% at 150 keV.

There are two basic modes of operation:

A: DC Current Mode, where the current flowing through a PIN photodiode is proportional to the incident radiation.

B: Individual Photon Counting Pulse Mode - where the PIN photodiode is coupled into a charge integrating amplifier. Here we see a gamma photon strike on a PIN photodiode (top trace) with the resulting comparator output on the trace below:


1304332516 543 FT0 Gamma Strike On Pin Photodiode



Nowadays, specialised gamma ray detecting PIN photodiodes are available (at a breath-taking price!) from the likes of Centronic and Hamamatsu, BUT common glass lens type PIN photodiodes such as BPX65 were used in professional dosimeter designs until quite recently.*

For use below about 15 keV, the glass lens of BPX65 should be removed, so as not to block low energy photons.

PIN photodiodes have replaced GM tubes in many applications, and are used extensively in gamma ray spectrometers.

Don't underestimate the technical challenge of the charge integrating amplifier! The circuits look elementary, but bad layouts, poor component selection, and inadequate screening will catch the woolly-minded every time! smile


* See, for example, US Patent 5059801 assigned to the UK National Radiological Protection Board Link2

Back to top
Inducktion
Mon May 02 2011, 12:46PM
Inducktion Registered Member #3637 Joined: Fri Jan 21 2011, 11:07PM
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 1068
Proud Mary wrote ...

Microwatt wrote ...

made from scintillator screen+ photodiode+ transistor+ lm311 comparator?

This type of circuit is employed in many professional instruments using PIN photodiodes, both with and without a scintillator, but a few words of explanation:

At 10 keV detection efficiency approaches 100%, a figure which falls to about 1% at 150 keV.

There are two basic modes of operation:

A: DC Current Mode, where the current flowing through a PIN photodiode is proportional to the incident radiation.

B: Individual Photon Counting Pulse Mode - where the PIN photodiode is coupled into a charge integrating amplifier. Here we see a gamma photon strike on a PIN photodiode (top trace) with the resulting comparator output on the trace below:


1304332516 543 FT0 Gamma Strike On Pin Photodiode



Nowadays, specialised gamma ray detecting PIN photodiodes are available (at a breath-taking price!) from the likes of Centronic and Hamamatsu, BUT common glass lens type PIN photodiodes such as BPX65 were used in professional dosimeter designs until quite recently.*

For use below about 15 keV, the glass lens of BPX65 should be removed, so as not to block low energy photons.

PIN photodiodes have replaced GM tubes in many applications, and are used extensively in gamma ray spectrometers.

Don't underestimate the technical challenge of the charge integrating amplifier! The circuits look elementary, but bad layouts, poor component selection, and inadequate screening will catch the woolly-minded every time! smile


* See, for example, US Patent 5059801 assigned to the UK National Radiological Protection Board Link2




If pin diodes can be used for cheap Geiger counters, Link2

Would something like that work as a cheaper replacement than the BPX65? How sensitive is it to other forms of radiation, if at all?


Back to top
Proud Mary
Mon May 02 2011, 01:10PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Inducktion wrote ...

Proud Mary wrote ...

Microwatt wrote ...

made from scintillator screen+ photodiode+ transistor+ lm311 comparator?

This type of circuit is employed in many professional instruments using PIN photodiodes, both with and without a scintillator, but a few words of explanation:

At 10 keV detection efficiency approaches 100%, a figure which falls to about 1% at 150 keV.

There are two basic modes of operation:

A: DC Current Mode, where the current flowing through a PIN photodiode is proportional to the incident radiation.

B: Individual Photon Counting Pulse Mode - where the PIN photodiode is coupled into a charge integrating amplifier. Here we see a gamma photon strike on a PIN photodiode (top trace) with the resulting comparator output on the trace below:


1304332516 543 FT0 Gamma Strike On Pin Photodiode



Nowadays, specialised gamma ray detecting PIN photodiodes are available (at a breath-taking price!) from the likes of Centronic and Hamamatsu, BUT common glass lens type PIN photodiodes such as BPX65 were used in professional dosimeter designs until quite recently.*

For use below about 15 keV, the glass lens of BPX65 should be removed, so as not to block low energy photons.

PIN photodiodes have replaced GM tubes in many applications, and are used extensively in gamma ray spectrometers.

Don't underestimate the technical challenge of the charge integrating amplifier! The circuits look elementary, but bad layouts, poor component selection, and inadequate screening will catch the woolly-minded every time! smile


* See, for example, US Patent 5059801 assigned to the UK National Radiological Protection Board Link2




If pin diodes can be used for cheap Geiger counters, Link2

Would something like that work as a cheaper replacement than the BPX65? How sensitive is it to other forms of radiation, if at all?

I'm sure that a number of PIN photodiode types will work to some degree, but I wouldn't want to make guesses about the performance of parts with which I am not familiar. Small surface area to keep capacitance down to a bare minimum is essential for correct operation of the charge integrating preamplifier. BPX65 has a 1 mm.sq active area, and also has the advantage of metal can self-screening which becomes critical with ultra-high impedance electrometer inputs.

PIN photodiodes in pulse mode can be used for the direct detection of alpha particles.*


*See: Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 47 (2008) pp. 1740-1741

Ultraviolet-Sensitive Windowless Silicon PIN Photodiodes for Alpha-Ray Spectrometry

Mitsuteru Mimura, Nobuyuki Hasebe, Shingo Kobayashi, Mitsuhiro Miyajima, Tadayoshi Doke, and Eido Shibamura

Energy resolution measurements of ultraviolet-sensitive windowless silicon p–i–n photodiodes were carried out with alpha rays. A resolution of 12.6 keV in full width at half maximum for 5.486 MeV was achieved. The ultraviolet-sensitive silicon p–i–n photodiodes were found to be suitable to alpha-ray spectrometry.

Back to top
Microwatt
Mon May 02 2011, 02:57PM
Microwatt Registered Member #3282 Joined: Wed Oct 06 2010, 05:01PM
Location:
Posts: 224
So why cannot a solar cell be used?
Back to top
Proud Mary
Mon May 02 2011, 03:12PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Microwatt wrote ...

So why cannot a solar cell be used?


Solar cells can be used - and were used - as X-ray detectors in the Gy/hr regime (i.e. it would not be nearly sensitive enough to detect typical amateur sources such as mineral specimens of 100 μGy/hr at most for best pitchblende)

See below: Journal of Applied Physiology January 1963 vol. 18 no. 1 209


Ray Detector


Note the meaty X-ray tube anode currents needed to bring the solar cell to life. Using the figures from the graph - 80kV, 500mA, 30 inches - the dose rate needed to produce 2V across the solar cell is a roasting 1100 Gy/hr.
Back to top
Microwatt
Mon May 02 2011, 03:59PM
Microwatt Registered Member #3282 Joined: Wed Oct 06 2010, 05:01PM
Location:
Posts: 224
but this can easily be overcome by biasing the solar cell a few hundred milivolts and using a comparator to detect events.
Back to top
Proud Mary
Mon May 02 2011, 04:32PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Microwatt wrote ...

but this can easily be overcome by biasing the solar cell a few hundred milivolts and using a comparator to detect events.

Well if you say so, who am I to disagree?
Back to top
Microwatt
Mon May 02 2011, 05:24PM
Microwatt Registered Member #3282 Joined: Wed Oct 06 2010, 05:01PM
Location:
Posts: 224
I mean do you think it would be possible to set up a solar cell to detect alpha particles if you have bias on the junction.
Back to top
1 2 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.