Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 58
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
Daniel Davis (54)


Next birthdays
05/29 Zonalklism (34)
05/29 Dr Hankenstein (68)
05/30 Quantum Singularity (47)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Electromagnetic Radiation
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Homemade X-ray machine question

1 2 3 4  last
Move Thread LAN_403
hsieh
Mon May 02 2011, 12:44AM Print
hsieh Registered Member #1412 Joined: Thu Mar 27 2008, 04:07PM
Location: Taipei Taiwan
Posts: 278
after reading some threads about homemade X-ray machines,I'm considering to build my own.But I think I can't find the Fluorescent screen or Scintillators describe here. Link2

I heard that films or photographic papers are sensitive to X-ray.But my parents won't allow me to develop photos at home.

Is it possible to use "instant films" to detect X-ray?

But after some Internet search I understand that they are sealed in a special box.I think is not easy to get it out without expose it.

Can I get it out in complete darkness,use it to detect X-ray,and activate it's develop process by rolling something over it?Will this work?

Or is it possible to use "glow in the dark" material to detect X-ray?

Thanks
Back to top
magnet18
Mon May 02 2011, 01:10AM
magnet18 Registered Member #3766 Joined: Sun Mar 20 2011, 05:39AM
Location: 1307912312 3766 FT117575 Indiana State
Posts: 624
Your parents are letting you build an x-ray machine, but they wont let you develop film?

There are probably ways around it, possible using something that absorbs ex-rays and emits visible light, then snap a regular picture?
Back to top
hsieh
Mon May 02 2011, 01:58AM
hsieh Registered Member #1412 Joined: Thu Mar 27 2008, 04:07PM
Location: Taipei Taiwan
Posts: 278
magnet18 wrote ...

Your parents are letting you build an x-ray machine, but they wont let you develop film?

There are probably ways around it, possible using something that absorbs ex-rays and emits visible light, then snap a regular picture?

My parents don't know what circuit or device I'm building,but developing film might need a lot of space and require using various chemicals solutions.This may affact other family members.

And in the digital image era,I'm not sure if it is easy to find those chemicals and other necessary materials in the location I live.
Back to top
James
Mon May 02 2011, 02:22AM
James Registered Member #3610 Joined: Thu Jan 13 2011, 03:29AM
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 506
Fluorescent screens can be obtained from x-ray film cassettes. To get reasonable results though you need a good camera, ideally a DSLR type. You still need much more exposure than with film. Polaroid type instant film does work, I've never tried it myself but others have reported good results.

Seriously though, developing monochrome film and paper is a very straightforward process. The chemicals are readily available, inexpensive, and relatively safe. Radiography is fun, but it is one of those things that truly can be very dangerous. You can't see or feel the radiation, it penetrates many materials effortlessly, absorbed dose accumulates over time and you can seriously increase your risk of developing cancer. Even more important than protecting yourself is ensuring that you do not irradiate anyone else nearby. You can get in serious trouble if it is discovered that this has happened. Proper shielding, and a way of measuring radiation leakage is absolutely essential. BE CAREFUL!
Back to top
klugesmith
Mon May 02 2011, 06:12AM
klugesmith Registered Member #2099 Joined: Wed Apr 29 2009, 12:22AM
Location: Los Altos, California
Posts: 1716
謝昕哲 wrote ...
Is it possible to use "instant films" to detect X-ray

Yes, in a couple of ways.
Polaroid used to make instant film specifically for x-rays.

More recently, I read about an amateur making "color" radiographs using the instant film technology originally introduced with the SX-70 camera. Normally, the camera ejects the film immediately after the exposure. Initially it's plain white, because on the way out of the camera the sensitive surface is covered with an opaque white paste. In the next minute, the image appears as dyes are released and diffuse through the white layer.

Point is, immediately after ejection from the camera, the film is no longer sensitive to light but IS still sensitive to x-rays. What this experimenter did (sorry, I could not find the reference in 5 minutes of Googling) is:
1) With camera lens cap on, push the shutter button. Blank picture pops out. If left alone, it would turn into a solid black image.
2) Put the blank picture in x-ray apparatus, close the shielding door, make x-ray exposure within the first 5 or 10 seconds.
3) wait for radiograph to appear.
Back to top
hsieh
Mon May 02 2011, 08:09AM
hsieh Registered Member #1412 Joined: Thu Mar 27 2008, 04:07PM
Location: Taipei Taiwan
Posts: 278
Klugesmith wrote ...


Point is, immediately after ejection from the camera, the film is no longer sensitive to light but IS still sensitive to x-rays. What this experimenter did (sorry, I could not find the reference in 5 minutes of Googling) is:
1) With camera lens cap on, push the shutter button. Blank picture pops out. If left alone, it would turn into a solid black image.
2) Put the blank picture in x-ray apparatus, close the shielding door, make x-ray exposure within the first 5 or 10 seconds.
3) wait for radiograph to appear.


But I don't have an instant camera.Is it possible to use the instant film to make radiograph without a instant camera?
Back to top
magnet18
Mon May 02 2011, 11:36AM
magnet18 Registered Member #3766 Joined: Sun Mar 20 2011, 05:39AM
Location: 1307912312 3766 FT117575 Indiana State
Posts: 624
謝昕哲 wrote ...
Is it possible to use the instant film to make radiograph without a instant camera?

I doubt it, unless you want to make the film yourself, which defeats the purpose.

Where are you planning on doing this at? Taipei isn't the most spread out city, since your folks are worried about the space required to develop photos I'm guessing you live in an apartment. X-rays like to scatter, I'll bet they can go through walls depending on how there made, and I doubt your neighbors will want to be irradiated.
Back to top
Proud Mary
Mon May 02 2011, 12:02PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
magnet18 wrote ...

謝昕哲 wrote ...
Is it possible to use the instant film to make radiograph without a instant camera?

I doubt it, unless you want to make the film yourself, which defeats the purpose.

Using "boil-in-a-bag" developer technology, the X-ray film plus intensifying screen comes in individual foil sachets into which you inject the developer after exposing the film. Link2

magnet18 wrote ...

Where are you planning on doing this at? Taipei isn't the most spread out city, since your folks are worried about the space required to develop photos I'm guessing you live in an apartment. X-rays like to scatter, I'll bet they can go through walls depending on how there made, and I doubt your neighbors will want to be irradiated.

You're right about this though, Mr Magnet.

Under no circumstances should children be given access to X-ray technology, or be encouraged in any activity without the informed consent of their parents.
Back to top
James
Mon May 02 2011, 05:45PM
James Registered Member #3610 Joined: Thu Jan 13 2011, 03:29AM
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 506
You could do it without the camera so long as you have a set of rollers to run the film through. Polaroid cameras can be found quite cheaply though so that shouldn't be much of an issue. Still seems like too much work though. I develop film and prints in my bathroom. When not in use, all of my supplies including a measuring cup and red LED nightlight fit neatly into the stacked developer trays that I stash in the cabinet under the sink.

I'm really concerned that you are not taking the safety aspect of this seriously though. If you are in an apartment, you absolutely will need a shielded box to operate x-ray equipment in. You will need to use lead shielding to ensure that both direct and scattered x-rays are absorbed. I'm not exaggerating the potential danger here. I know nothing about the legal system in Taiwan, but in some parts of the world, playing with this stuff at home could land you in prison.
Back to top
IamSmooth
Mon May 02 2011, 09:39PM
IamSmooth Registered Member #190 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 12:00AM
Location:
Posts: 1567
謝昕哲 wrote ...

My parents don't know what circuit or device I'm building,but developing film might need a lot of space and require using various chemicals solutions.This may affact other family members.


I have to agree with others that Xrays are very dangerous. You will have no idea what level of exposure you are getting. In fact, you will probably be exposing your family members to radiation without them realizing it. Early pioneers in radiography died uncomfortable deaths because of exposure.

If you are serious about this you need to discuss it with your family. They need to know. Personally, I think you should try something safer unless you are fully prepared to get the necessary protective lead jackets, gloves and goggles.
Back to top
1 2 3 4  last

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.