Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 72
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
Th3_uN1Qu3 (33)


Next birthdays
06/17 Th3_uN1Qu3 (33)
06/19 sio2 (50)
06/20 Sparrow338 (35)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Electromagnetic Radiation
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Alternative Shielding

1 2 3 4 
Move Thread LAN_403
Adam Munich
Wed Apr 27 2011, 10:53PM Print
Adam Munich Registered Member #2893 Joined: Tue Jun 01 2010, 09:25PM
Location: Cali-forn. i. a.
Posts: 2242
Now most people just use lead metal when shielding x-rays, but lately I've been thinking of alternative methods of shielding radiation.

One method I have dreamed up would be to dissolve some lead nitrate or acetate in water, then add some xanthan gum to thicken it up a little. This goo could then be poured in a plastic bag or another container, and aside from being an x-ray sheild it would also be a neutron moderator.

Another method I've dreamed up would to be to mix some lead powder with plasticine clay, but since lead powder is expensive iron filings could be a possible substitute, even if more clay is needed. Also, one could mix lead sulfide powder with clay and that would be a non-toxic shielding clay, but I can't seem to find lead sulfide for sale anywhere.

So, does anyone else have any ideas? This is mainly just a discussion thread.
Back to top
magnet18
Wed Apr 27 2011, 11:07PM
magnet18 Registered Member #3766 Joined: Sun Mar 20 2011, 05:39AM
Location: 1307912312 3766 FT117575 Indiana State
Posts: 624
I would think that dissolving the lead or otherwise doing something along those lines would lower the density too much, but i've never tried it, so it's probably worth a shot.
From a chemistry standpoint, acetate is a rather large polyationic ion, so something along the ines of lead iodide might work better, and allow a higher density, though lead iodide is insoluble...
Lead paint? many, many layers? It would be both more dense and have a higher ppm than anything dissolved.
I think one problem may be that anything added that doesn't stop x-rays will only make it a less effective shield. I'm attempting to think of things that would be liquid and leave behind pure lead once cured..., like bubbles coming out...
Back to top
James
Wed Apr 27 2011, 11:08PM
James Registered Member #3610 Joined: Thu Jan 13 2011, 03:29AM
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 506
Leaded glass is used in CRTs. I have a dental x-ray tube that has some sort of ceramic shielding sleeve around it, so alternates have been used.
Back to top
Proud Mary
Thu Apr 28 2011, 12:08AM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Lead shot can be poured into moulds or forms of any needed shape. It can be cast with resins or silicones, or used 'dry' so it can be re-used again later in some different shape. Obviously the average density per ml is less than solid lead.

Lead is so often chosen because it provides high density at a good price, and is easily cut, worked, and painted.

Where shielding compactness is not central to a design, there is no reason at all not to use other, cheaper materials such as steel and concrete, provided there is enough of it.

Lead has only limited self-support capability, so can usefully be combined with sheet steel in a laminate combining the density of lead with the structural strength of steel. I have found both industrial epoxy and rivets quite satisfactory for making laminates of this kind. The steel sheet may be placed on the outside, so the lead is securely sealed off from the environment.

The use of steel and lead composites is mandatory for immediate X-ray tube housing in some radiation safety protocols.

I would strongly advise against having anything to do with any toxic lead compounds.




Back to top
magnet18
Thu Apr 28 2011, 12:17AM
magnet18 Registered Member #3766 Joined: Sun Mar 20 2011, 05:39AM
Location: 1307912312 3766 FT117575 Indiana State
Posts: 624
Proud Mary wrote ...
I would strongly advise against having anything to do with any toxic lead compounds.

Because x-rays are so safe?
Back to top
Wolfram
Thu Apr 28 2011, 05:11AM
Wolfram Registered Member #33 Joined: Sat Feb 04 2006, 01:31PM
Location: Norway
Posts: 971
They are, if proper safety precautions are taken. No need to add potential lead poisoning through soluble lead salts, if there are other viable options.

Lead poisoning is a real concern, and while there is a lot of talk here about radiological protection, there is very little talk on working safely with lead.

Link2
Back to top
Proud Mary
Thu Apr 28 2011, 08:01AM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Anders M. wrote ...

They are, if proper safety precautions are taken. No need to add potential lead poisoning through soluble lead salts, if there are other viable options.

Lead poisoning is a real concern, and while there is a lot of talk here about radiological protection, there is very little talk on working safely with lead.

Link2

Quite right, Anders. In this thread, as in others like it where I have raised the problem of lead toxicity over these last years, the need for precautions has been greeted without enthusiasm.

I don't recall a single case where someone has asked about the lawful disposal of hazardous lead waste, how does one arrange it, and how much does it cost.
Back to top
cedric
Thu Apr 28 2011, 08:47AM
cedric Registered Member #2941 Joined: Fri Jun 25 2010, 08:08AM
Location:
Posts: 143
what's about sand-bag?it's not expensive ,non toxic and it does protect against x-ray...
by the way ,I use lead shielding for x-ray as well but I don't like to use lead directly after the tube because lead reflect also a lot of x-ray .I think an absorbing material like dense wood before the shield can help to reduce secondary emission...
Back to top
Bored Chemist
Thu Apr 28 2011, 11:44AM
Bored Chemist Registered Member #193 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 07:04AM
Location: sheffield
Posts: 1022
A nice thing about the solution of lead acetate is that it transparent. If you put it in a flat walled container you have a window that is opaque to X-rays but transparent to visible light. I know you can get lead glass for that, but it's hardly easy to get unless you are breaking up a TV set.
Back to top
magnet18
Thu Apr 28 2011, 02:38PM
magnet18 Registered Member #3766 Joined: Sun Mar 20 2011, 05:39AM
Location: 1307912312 3766 FT117575 Indiana State
Posts: 624
Proud Mary wrote ...

Anders M. wrote ...

They are, if proper safety precautions are taken. No need to add potential lead poisoning through soluble lead salts, if there are other viable options.

Lead poisoning is a real concern, and while there is a lot of talk here about radiological protection, there is very little talk on working safely with lead.

Link2

Quite right, Anders. In this thread, as in others like it where I have raised the problem of lead toxicity over these last years, the need for precautions has been greeted without enthusiasm.

I don't recall a single case where someone has asked about the lawful disposal of hazardous lead waste, how does one arrange it, and how much does it cost.


Alright, lead wastes can be problematic, but lead is commonly used all the time, IIRC some parts of the country such as older sections of cities actually have lead plumbing (only in return pipes, I hope).
As long as it is used responsibly, and not dumped down drains, it can be perfectly safe. If you were to use lead paint, it would still be safe, especially if you painted over it again. It's not sitting outside, and no-ones licking it, so it should be safe. Just be sure not to spill any and wash your hands well and you should be fine.

Grenadier, does your x-ray machiene currently work? If so, try making the solutions you suggested and x-raying them, see what happens.
Back to top
1 2 3 4 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.