Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 71
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Capper (60)
cereus (73)
Mcanderson (43)


Next birthdays
11/05 Capper (60)
11/05 cereus (73)
11/05 Mcanderson (43)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Gravitational Wave Telescope Could See Beyond Big Bang

Move Thread LAN_403
Proud Mary
Mon Apr 18 2011, 12:42PM Print
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Underground telescope could peer beyond the Big Bang
A telescope buried up to half a mile underground could give scientists their first glimpse of the dawn of the universe.

By Richard Gray, Science Correspondent
The Telegraph
17 Apr 2011


The ambitious new device is designed to detect gravitational waves – an elusive phenomena created by some of the most violent events in the universe such as black holes, neutron stars and the Big Bang.

Although they have never been directly detected, these waves of gravity are thought to echo through the universe like ripples from a stone thrown into a pond and they could provide scientists with a new way of mapping the sky.

The telescope, which is likely to cost between £500 million and £1 billion to build, will be built inside a network of tunnels 12 miles long and buried up to half a mile underground to dampen any interference from vibrations on the surface.

The project is expected to rival the Large Hadron Collider, the 17 mile particle smasher on the French Swiss Border that was switched on in 2008, in its scale and ambition.

Physicists claim the telescope will give them the first chance to see a black hole, which until now have only been detected indirectly because of the stars and debris orbiting them, and see into the centre of powerful stars known as neutron stars.

The telescope, called the Einstein Telescope, could also reveal for the first time whether there were universes in existence before our own by looking for the echoes of previous Big Bangs similar to the one that created our own universe 13.7 billion years ago.

Highly precise lasers will be beamed along two six mile long vacuum chambers to detect minute changes in the distance between targets at either end caused by gravitational waves passing through the Earth.

Professor B S Sathyaprakash, an astrophysicist at Cardiff University and chair of the science working party for the Einstein Telescope, said: "There is huge potential to see the universe in a completely new way with gravitational waves.

"They are very weak by the time they reach the Earth, but with a sensitive detector we will be able to get direct evidence for black holes, learn more about how the universe is expanding and pick up some of the gravitational waves from the big bang.

"If we are really lucky we get some signals from before the big bang that might help explain what existed before our own universe and whether we are living in just one of a continuous cycle of big bangs and rapid expansions."

Scientists behind the project, which is being led by the European Gravitational Observatory, are due to hold a meeting in Pisa, Italy next month to outline their plans for the new telescope.

They are proposing to build the telescope in one of 14 candidate sites that are currently undergoing extensive seismic testing to ensure disturbances deep inside the earth's crust will not interfere with the measurement.

The sites include abandoned mines in Poland, Hungary, Romania, France, Italy and Germany but they could also build new tunnels to house the telescope, which will consist two "arms" that are each six miles long.

At the end of each arm will be mirrored targets suspended on the end of long pendulums that will be used to reflect a laser beam.

The lasers will be fired through along the six mile arms in a close to perfect vacuum and at temperatures below -238 degrees F to reduce the external changes that could interfere with signals from gravitational waves.

Gravitational waves are created by objects like black holes moving through space and time, which creates ripples that move out at the speed of light, rather like those that occur when a stone is thrown into a pond.

They were first predicted by Albert Einstein in his theory of general relativity.

When these waves interact with particles, such as those that make up the mirrored targets in the telescope, they cause them to stretch and shrink.

Differences in the amount of stretching and shrinking in each arm of the Einstein Telescope can then be used, with the help of computers, to build up a picture of what created the gravitational wave and pinpoint its source.

Astronomers currently rely on visible light, radio waves and X-rays coming from distant objects for their view of the universe, but they are limited by how far these can penetrate through space.

Gravitational waves can cover far greater distances and echoes from the moment of the Big Bang, when the universe burst into being, are thought to still exist.

There are a number of smaller experiments that are nearing completion that are expected to detect gravitational waves for the first time.

Another project to use three spacecraft flying in formation to detect gravitational waves suffered a blow this month when Nasa said it may not be able to fund its part of the joint project with the European Space Agency.

Professor Alberto Vecchio, an expert on gravitational waves at Birmingham University who is among those leading the search to find the first gravitational waves, said: "Gravitational waves are essentially a different kind of broadcast channel coming from objects in space and allow us to build an entirely new class of telescope.

"It should allow us to see black holes, as they are among the strongest sources of gravitational waves and we will also be able to see neutron stars just moments before they collapse.

"Previous attempts to detect gravitational waves on the surface have produced difficulties because clouds or aircraft passing overhead have produced readings. Going underground where it is very quiet means we can build a very sensitive instrument."
Back to top
Chip Fixes
Mon Apr 18 2011, 03:37PM
Chip Fixes Registered Member #3781 Joined: Sat Mar 26 2011, 02:25AM
Location:
Posts: 701
This is very cool although I think the money should be spent on something more important...
Back to top
Bored Chemist
Mon Apr 18 2011, 06:31PM
Bored Chemist Registered Member #193 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 07:04AM
Location: sheffield
Posts: 1022
Camp Badger wrote ...

This is very cool although I think the money should be spent on something more important...
Yes, there are lots of things that are more important than finding out where we all came from. Nobody is interested in that.
Back to top
Sulaiman
Wed Apr 20 2011, 08:14PM
Sulaiman Registered Member #162 Joined: Mon Feb 13 2006, 10:25AM
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3140
Have Gravitational Waves been directly detected?
If Yes, then it's too expensive,
If no, then it's irresponsible.
Back to top
Bjørn
Thu Apr 21 2011, 09:03AM
Bjørn Registered Member #27 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 02:20AM
Location: Hyperborea
Posts: 2058
No gravitational waves have been directly detected yet.

A negative result is not a failure. It means that the brightest minds in the world with all their carefully constructed theories and math are barking up the wrong tree. Such a result can be just as valuable as a positive result.

One positive is that a lot of people will learn something useful while designing and building the thing, no matter if it works at all. But it seems to be an extremely expensive way to teach some people something they did not really need to know. In 10 years time the whole thing can probably be done at 5% of the cost anyway.

Someone once said:
"And somewhere there are engineers
Helping others to fly faster than sound.
But where are the engineers
Helping those who must live on the ground."
Back to top
Saz43
Mon Apr 25 2011, 08:03PM
Saz43 Registered Member #1525 Joined: Mon Jun 09 2008, 12:16AM
Location: America
Posts: 294
Bjørn wrote ...

But where are the engineers
Helping those who must live on the ground."

You mean the guys who couldn't hack the aerospace classes? They're called civil engineers and we have plenty of them!
Back to top
Mattski
Mon Apr 25 2011, 08:29PM
Mattski Registered Member #1792 Joined: Fri Oct 31 2008, 08:12PM
Location: University of California
Posts: 527
Bjørn wrote ...

In 10 years time the whole thing can probably be done at 5% of the cost anyway.
Not likely. Major construction projects tend to increases in price over time as the prices of fuel, raw materials, and labor all tend to go up. The computing and data storage costs will decrease, but that won't be anywhere near 95% of the experiment's cost.

Our taxes can pay for thousands of scientists to sit at their desks and come up with theories, but at some point we need to pay for experiments if we want to continue figuring out how the universe works. I'm not a physicist so I would not be well-suited to evaluate the technical merit of this experiment versus cost, but it certainly sounds like something humanity should look into.
Back to top
Pinky's Brain
Wed Apr 27 2011, 02:19AM
Pinky's Brain Registered Member #2901 Joined: Thu Jun 03 2010, 01:25PM
Location:
Posts: 837
Bored Chemist wrote ...

Yes, there are lots of things that are more important than finding out where we all came from. Nobody is interested in that.
Interest is irrelevant ... compare this to the paltry sums being invested in alternative energy research, a problem which we have to solve within decades. I don't begrudge any researcher money, but I do think a billion starts getting in the neighbourhood where the expense starts hurting more productive use of funds.

PS. but hell, I think ITER is a boondoggle as well.
Back to top
magnet18
Wed Apr 27 2011, 02:41AM
magnet18 Registered Member #3766 Joined: Sun Mar 20 2011, 05:39AM
Location: 1307912312 3766 FT117575 Indiana State
Posts: 624
So if there are gravity waves from the big bang, what did they echo off of?
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.