Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 72
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
nitromarsjipan (2024)
mb (31)
Joyeep (32)


Next birthdays
11/05 Capper (60)
11/05 cereus (73)
11/05 Mcanderson (43)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Will a battleship float in a bathtub?

Move Thread LAN_403
IamSmooth
Mon Jan 31 2011, 12:10PM Print
IamSmooth Registered Member #190 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 12:00AM
Location:
Posts: 1567
I was reading this question and found it interesting. The site I read ventured to say, yes it can. It presented a graphical answer: if you put a thin film around the ship, leaving a thin layer around the ship. Freeze the water around the film and carve out a bathtub. The ship should be floating.

Now, I don't know if I accept this. When the ship is dropped in the tub it displaces its weight of water. This mass of water surrounds the ship and pushes down, and this force works its way underneath the ship and pushes up. If one freezes the water around the ship, and carves out a tub, the "push" from the water around the sides is lost, and the ship might sink.

Imagine two cylinders, with one fitting inside the other. If the layer of water between the two is thin enough, will there be enough "mass" to push down in order to push the bottom of the cylinder up?

For this question I am ignoring electrostatic forces and surface tension. I am just talking about bouyancy.
Back to top
Marko
Mon Jan 31 2011, 02:10PM
Marko Registered Member #89 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 02:40PM
Location: Zadar, Croatia
Posts: 3145
Hi,

Yup, you seem to be rediscovering the famous "hydrostatic paradox", which says that a narrow column of fluid indeed exerts the same pressure to it's bottom as a huge one.

It's easiest to consider the forces if you simply think of submerging a brick/cylinder into a tub just slightly larger than it. Now matter how you reduce the area of columns of water around the block by making the tub smaller, you reduce the area they are pushing on as well, and hence the pressure remains constant, and equal to pressure exerted by the block which is always constant (as long as it floats, if you push it in by hand, the side columns will rise to mantain the pressure) - in other words, you can think of the fluid on the floor acting as a sort of a hydraulic press here. In the end it is the floor of the tub that bears the downward force load, not the side columns as one can be led to believe.

Finally, you must never forget that the submerged part of the ship is still exactly the same density as water - thinking that it would sink in a tub reduces to absurd as soon as you realize that water should then sink into water when you pour it in as well...

Marko
Back to top
Ash Small
Mon Jan 31 2011, 09:51PM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
Marko wrote ...

.Finally, you must never forget that the submerged part of the ship is still exactly the same density as water - thinking that it would sink in a tub reduces to absurd as soon as you realize that water should then sink into water when you pour it in as well...

Marko


This is incorrect, the submerged part is not the same density as the water.

Think of an iceberg. Is the submerged part of an iceberg the same density as the water displaced? The answer is no, ice is less dense than water.

The total weight (mass) of the ship is the same weight (mass) as the water displaced by the submerged part.

Back to top
klugesmith
Mon Jan 31 2011, 10:14PM
klugesmith Registered Member #2099 Joined: Wed Apr 29 2009, 12:22AM
Location: Los Altos, California
Posts: 1716
OK, an old quiz problem:

A boat is floating in a small pond. In the boat are a man and a large rock.
The man picks up the rock and drops it overboard. What will happen to the water level in the pond?

I like this one because it's easy to actually demonstrate, in a bucket or a kitchen sink. Been there, done that.

-Rich

[edit] and of course a stationary hovercraft at sea makes the same size depression in the water, whether its lift blowers are on or off.



Back to top
Ash Small
Mon Jan 31 2011, 10:18PM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
The water level will drop, the rock will only displace it's own volume of water, not it's mass of water.
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.