Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 27
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
Bfeigum (35)


Next birthdays
07/11 Bfeigum (35)
07/12 genious 7 (32)
07/13 Friday (55)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Electromagnetic Radiation
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

any viable ways to make a 2.4 GHz amplifier?

Move Thread LAN_403
haxor5354
Sun Jan 30 2011, 07:48PM Print
haxor5354 Registered Member #2063 Joined: Sat Apr 04 2009, 03:16PM
Location: Toronto
Posts: 352
i wanted to make an wifi AP thats gonna have atleast 5 watts of transmitting power
the wifi amplifiers that i see on the internet cost over $200
so are there anyway to homebrew a 2.4Ghz amp?
also, do higher frequencies EMF travel further through air than lower frequencies, and higher the frequency the lower the penetrating power through solid walls vice versa?
Back to top
Mattski
Sun Jan 30 2011, 08:56PM
Mattski Registered Member #1792 Joined: Fri Oct 31 2008, 08:12PM
Location: University of California
Posts: 527
You can pretty easily buy a packaged 2.4GHz amplifier from Avago or Skyworks which puts out about 1W maximum. I'm not sure if you can find one that puts out 5W, that's fairly high. But you can always buy several of these amplifiers and power combine them with either a packaged SMT power combiner or a power combiner you design on the PCB.

Homebrewing an amplifier at that power level is doable, but it will take quite a bit of effort to design from scratch if you aren't familiar with RF amplifier techniques.

In general low frequencies will travel further outdoors, and I'm pretty sure that applies to indoors as well.
Back to top
Ash Small
Mon Jan 31 2011, 05:18AM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
Not sure if this is relevant to this particular project, but it is possible to reduce the output of a microwave magnetron by reducing the value of the series capacitor. There is an article here that describes how to get one to run CW at around 100 watts:

Link2

There are also loads of links here about homebrew radar and GHz transmitters:

Link2

As I said previously, I'm not sure if any of this is relavant to this project, but I think it is 'on topic' regarding 'any viable ways to make a 2.4GHz amplifier'.
Back to top
hboy007
Tue Feb 01 2011, 11:55PM
hboy007 Registered Member #1667 Joined: Sat Aug 30 2008, 09:57PM
Location:
Posts: 374
I've been coming back to this thread several times and now that you got me interested, I've just stumbled upon this HEMT FET:
Link2
and this one has a demo board included in the datasheet:
Link2
I even feel tempted to start experimenting with these myself smile
Back to top
Dave Marshall
Wed Feb 02 2011, 05:26AM
Dave Marshall Registered Member #16 Joined: Thu Feb 02 2006, 02:22PM
Location: New Wilmington, PA
Posts: 554
Wifi amps are bidirectional, and that makes them inherently complex and expensive. A 1w amplifier will set you back about $200 if you shop carefully.

Also, you will not find a 5w amplifier that is legal to import into the US, as the maximum permissible power for 802.11x in the US is 4w EIRP, or Effective Isontropically Radiated Power.

At 5 watts actual output power from the amplifier, unless you intend to run it through a rather long length of coax, and still use an antenna with almost no gain at all, you will exceed this limit.

With a well designed antenna, in fact, it is quite possible to exceed that power limit with a standard 250mW wifi router.

-Dave
Back to top
Conundrum
Wed Feb 02 2011, 06:23AM
Conundrum Registered Member #96 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:37PM
Location: CI, Earth
Posts: 4062
hmm, interesting.
I read somewhere that using a cantenna with a cheap wifi "stick" breaks the rules, is this true?

-A
Back to top
hboy007
Wed Feb 02 2011, 01:28PM
hboy007 Registered Member #1667 Joined: Sat Aug 30 2008, 09:57PM
Location:
Posts: 374
Dave Marshall wrote ...
Wifi amps are bidirectional, and that makes them inherently complex and expensive.

What is the magic behind it? One could use a directional coupler to split RX and TX units - or are there even more exotic circuits involved? Looking at these boards
Link2
I assume nothing is impossible...
Back to top
Mattski
Wed Feb 02 2011, 10:15PM
Mattski Registered Member #1792 Joined: Fri Oct 31 2008, 08:12PM
Location: University of California
Posts: 527
wrote ...
What is the magic behind it? One could use a directional coupler to split RX and TX units - or are there even more exotic circuits involved? Looking at these boards

I assume nothing is impossible...
Yes it's possible, but a directional coupler is not a great way to go about it. The one on the page you linked to has 11dB coupling ratio, meaning that most of the signal at the antenna would not be coupled to the receive amplifier. Assuming you put the PA on the input port, LNA on the Rev port, terminate the Fwd port and connect the antenna to the output port, then you have the competing problems of low coupling factor to the LNA degrades receive SNR, or large coupling factor gives better signal to the LNA but dumps a lot of the PA's power into the isolation resistor, increases insertion loss from PA to antenna.

I assume wifi signals are time shared meaning you don't need transmit and receive simultaneously, so a T/R switch works well to switch the antenna between PA and LNA. If the amplifier is being grafted onto an existing antenna port for an AP then it can detect a transmit condition and switch appropriately. Otherwise circulators can be used, which are unfortunately rather pricey.
Back to top
ConKbot of Doom
Thu Feb 03 2011, 05:49PM
ConKbot of Doom Registered Member #509 Joined: Sat Feb 10 2007, 07:02AM
Location:
Posts: 329
Mattski wrote ...

wrote ...
What is the magic behind it? One could use a directional coupler to split RX and TX units - or are there even more exotic circuits involved? Looking at these boards

I assume nothing is impossible...
Yes it's possible, but a directional coupler is not a great way to go about it. The one on the page you linked to has 11dB coupling ratio, meaning that most of the signal at the antenna would not be coupled to the receive amplifier. Assuming you put the PA on the input port, LNA on the Rev port, terminate the Fwd port and connect the antenna to the output port, then you have the competing problems of low coupling factor to the LNA degrades receive SNR, or large coupling factor gives better signal to the LNA but dumps a lot of the PA's power into the isolation resistor, increases insertion loss from PA to antenna.

I assume wifi signals are time shared meaning you don't need transmit and receive simultaneously, so a T/R switch works well to switch the antenna between PA and LNA. If the amplifier is being grafted onto an existing antenna port for an AP then it can detect a transmit condition and switch appropriately. Otherwise circulators can be used, which are unfortunately rather pricey.

Sometimes you can specify a tx and an rx antenna on an AP. You could then have seperate amplifiers, and as long as too much output from the TX antenna isnt coupling over to the RX antenna and saturating the LNA which may take a little bit to recover, you should be fine. I think Ive seen this used for long range link setups where 2 cantennas/pringles can antennas were used, and were spaced apart because it provided a benefit I cant recall at the moment.
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.