If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #2063
Joined: Sat Apr 04 2009, 03:16PM
Location: Toronto
Posts: 352
i wanted to make an wifi AP thats gonna have atleast 5 watts of transmitting power the wifi amplifiers that i see on the internet cost over $200 so are there anyway to homebrew a 2.4Ghz amp? also, do higher frequencies EMF travel further through air than lower frequencies, and higher the frequency the lower the penetrating power through solid walls vice versa?
Registered Member #1792
Joined: Fri Oct 31 2008, 08:12PM
Location: University of California
Posts: 527
You can pretty easily buy a packaged 2.4GHz amplifier from Avago or Skyworks which puts out about 1W maximum. I'm not sure if you can find one that puts out 5W, that's fairly high. But you can always buy several of these amplifiers and power combine them with either a packaged SMT power combiner or a power combiner you design on the PCB.
Homebrewing an amplifier at that power level is doable, but it will take quite a bit of effort to design from scratch if you aren't familiar with RF amplifier techniques.
In general low frequencies will travel further outdoors, and I'm pretty sure that applies to indoors as well.
Registered Member #3414
Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
Not sure if this is relevant to this particular project, but it is possible to reduce the output of a microwave magnetron by reducing the value of the series capacitor. There is an article here that describes how to get one to run CW at around 100 watts:
There are also loads of links here about homebrew radar and GHz transmitters:
As I said previously, I'm not sure if any of this is relavant to this project, but I think it is 'on topic' regarding 'any viable ways to make a 2.4GHz amplifier'.
Registered Member #1667
Joined: Sat Aug 30 2008, 09:57PM
Location:
Posts: 374
I've been coming back to this thread several times and now that you got me interested, I've just stumbled upon this HEMT FET: and this one has a demo board included in the datasheet: I even feel tempted to start experimenting with these myself
Registered Member #16
Joined: Thu Feb 02 2006, 02:22PM
Location: New Wilmington, PA
Posts: 554
Wifi amps are bidirectional, and that makes them inherently complex and expensive. A 1w amplifier will set you back about $200 if you shop carefully.
Also, you will not find a 5w amplifier that is legal to import into the US, as the maximum permissible power for 802.11x in the US is 4w EIRP, or Effective Isontropically Radiated Power.
At 5 watts actual output power from the amplifier, unless you intend to run it through a rather long length of coax, and still use an antenna with almost no gain at all, you will exceed this limit.
With a well designed antenna, in fact, it is quite possible to exceed that power limit with a standard 250mW wifi router.
Registered Member #1667
Joined: Sat Aug 30 2008, 09:57PM
Location:
Posts: 374
Dave Marshall wrote ... Wifi amps are bidirectional, and that makes them inherently complex and expensive.
What is the magic behind it? One could use a directional coupler to split RX and TX units - or are there even more exotic circuits involved? Looking at these boards I assume nothing is impossible...
Registered Member #1792
Joined: Fri Oct 31 2008, 08:12PM
Location: University of California
Posts: 527
wrote ... What is the magic behind it? One could use a directional coupler to split RX and TX units - or are there even more exotic circuits involved? Looking at these boards
I assume nothing is impossible...
Yes it's possible, but a directional coupler is not a great way to go about it. The one on the page you linked to has 11dB coupling ratio, meaning that most of the signal at the antenna would not be coupled to the receive amplifier. Assuming you put the PA on the input port, LNA on the Rev port, terminate the Fwd port and connect the antenna to the output port, then you have the competing problems of low coupling factor to the LNA degrades receive SNR, or large coupling factor gives better signal to the LNA but dumps a lot of the PA's power into the isolation resistor, increases insertion loss from PA to antenna.
I assume wifi signals are time shared meaning you don't need transmit and receive simultaneously, so a T/R switch works well to switch the antenna between PA and LNA. If the amplifier is being grafted onto an existing antenna port for an AP then it can detect a transmit condition and switch appropriately. Otherwise circulators can be used, which are unfortunately rather pricey.
Registered Member #509
Joined: Sat Feb 10 2007, 07:02AM
Location:
Posts: 329
Mattski wrote ...
wrote ... What is the magic behind it? One could use a directional coupler to split RX and TX units - or are there even more exotic circuits involved? Looking at these boards
I assume nothing is impossible...
Yes it's possible, but a directional coupler is not a great way to go about it. The one on the page you linked to has 11dB coupling ratio, meaning that most of the signal at the antenna would not be coupled to the receive amplifier. Assuming you put the PA on the input port, LNA on the Rev port, terminate the Fwd port and connect the antenna to the output port, then you have the competing problems of low coupling factor to the LNA degrades receive SNR, or large coupling factor gives better signal to the LNA but dumps a lot of the PA's power into the isolation resistor, increases insertion loss from PA to antenna.
I assume wifi signals are time shared meaning you don't need transmit and receive simultaneously, so a T/R switch works well to switch the antenna between PA and LNA. If the amplifier is being grafted onto an existing antenna port for an AP then it can detect a transmit condition and switch appropriately. Otherwise circulators can be used, which are unfortunately rather pricey.
Sometimes you can specify a tx and an rx antenna on an AP. You could then have seperate amplifiers, and as long as too much output from the TX antenna isnt coupling over to the RX antenna and saturating the LNA which may take a little bit to recover, you should be fine. I think Ive seen this used for long range link setups where 2 cantennas/pringles can antennas were used, and were spaced apart because it provided a benefit I cant recall at the moment.
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.