Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 30
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
Steve Conner (46)


Next birthdays
04/29 GODSFUSION (37)
04/29 Zajcek (37)
04/29 ElectroDog (33)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: High Voltage
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

HV Resistive Divider for NST measurement...

1 2 
Move Thread LAN_403
Patrick
Mon Dec 06 2010, 06:12AM Print
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
WOOOOO HOOOOOO !!!!!!!

ive got a voltage divider that finnally works!
, its been 2.5 years of work, and i still have a few more months of work, but for the first time ive got good data that is credible/repeatable.

ok here we go:
remember that the divider is 1000:1
using the Fluke 73 III (ground to 'B') = 6.80V @ 123.2 V input to NST
using the Fluke 79 II (ground to 'A') = 6.68V @ 123.2 Vin
using the Fluke 79 II (ground to 'B') = 6.76V @ 123.2 Vin.

The 79 II says: +/- (0.4% + 1 count), the 79 II, is more accurate, then the 73 III.

The resistor has a max inductance of 5.3uH which is a calculated guess.

now for the ugly part:
the accuracy of the 79 II, and the 200M ohm resistor....

--well the rox series resistor used in this test is spec'ed at +/-1% for 200M Ohms. (upper resistor)so it could be as low as 198M or as high as 202Mohms.
--The 79 II specs are +/- (0.4% + 1 count), the 79 II for the lower resistor 204.8k Ohms.
--For voltage the 79 II is spec'ed as +/-(1.0% + 2 counts) for the range used on 6 to 8 volts.
(There is much more math to add here but its 1am and i need sleep...ZZzzzZzzZzzZZz...)


1291607459 2431 FT1630 Div
Seen in the schematic, R1 is 198M to 202M ohms, R2 is 205.6k to 204.0k Ohms, so the 13.4kV number could be ( more to add, after sleep )

so, 6.68kV + 6.76kV = 13.4kV with proper sig figs !
from a 12kV NST i think this is credible, as soon as one were to draw arcs it would drop to near or about 12kV im sure. these seem to be credible and repeatable on different days with different set ups. only the occasional flickers of the hundredths place, one or two counts up or down every 3 to 5 seconds.

the math actually works out to 13.44kV but only three digits are justified.

1291615959 2431 FT0 Sam 0223cropped
the setup 200M in series with 204.8 kohms. (ignore the digits on the display)


1291615959 2431 FT0 Sam 0224cropped
The HV production devices, the variac was used for safety, wall current/voltage is used for all quoted numbers in this post.
(ignore the black square, thats censored info, the dean of engineering and FSB, NKVD, Kgb, CIA cant know what im upto.)


1291615959 2431 FT0 Sam 0226cropped
Variac, 55 years old if i can count.
Back to top
Proud Mary
Mon Dec 06 2010, 09:53AM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
The construction and testing of the famous Park HV standard resistor still has much in it of interest and relevance even after half a century has gone by since it was invented:

Link2


Back to top
Patrick
Mon Dec 06 2010, 10:08AM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
Proud Mary wrote ...

The construction and testing of the famous Park HV standard resistor still has much in it of interest and relevance even after half a century has gone by since it was invented:

Link2



i will read this in detail...
Back to top
Patrick
Wed Dec 08 2010, 04:01AM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
Excellent PDF document. TY Proud Mary
Back to top
Proud Mary
Wed Dec 08 2010, 07:21AM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Patrick wrote ...

Excellent PDF document. TY Proud Mary

My own HV metrology project has turned out not to be so simple as it first appeared, which is why it has stalled.

A problem has occurred at the lower end of the scale - 10kV, where there is not enough juice going through the 3G to reliably work
the meter without a DC amplifier - which then starts amplifying all sorts of induced signals from the environment, so
far as I can see with my simple equipment. I think I will have to copy the resistor shielding technique used in the Park Resistor, and see how
far that takes me.

Stella
Back to top
Patrick
Wed Dec 08 2010, 02:52PM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
i suspected that your 3Gohms was a wee bit on the high side, i too have a 2Gohm resistor and its too weak to be useful.
Back to top
Proud Mary
Wed Dec 08 2010, 05:25PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Patrick wrote ...

i suspected that your 3Gohms was a wee bit on the high side, i too have a 2Gohm resistor and its too weak to be useful.

Still, it is very helpful to know what does not work - especially if we understand why it doesn't - so we can learn by our mistakes, eh, Patrick? smile
Back to top
Patrick
Wed Dec 08 2010, 05:32PM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
Proud Mary wrote ...


Still, it is very helpful to know what does not work - especially if we understand why it doesn't - so we can learn by our mistakes, eh, Patrick? smile

YES-YES-YES, failures are important lessons learned, just because you learned what doesnt work doesnt mean that realization has no value--quite the opposite.
Back to top
Patrick
Wed Dec 15 2010, 07:23AM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
Update, i have new resistors, now i can make currrent/voltage measurements, at the same time!

using the Fluke 79 II (ground to 'A') = 6.490 kV @ 122.8 Vin. (5.730 Mohms) x (1.133 mA)
using the Fluke 79 II (ground to 'B') = 6.572 kV @ 122.8 Vin. (5.730 Mohms) x (1.147 mA)

total "A across B " Voltage = 6.490 + 6.572 = 13.06 kV

this from what the label says is a 6-0-6 -- 12kV NST,
when i used a 2Gohm resistor/divider i got bogus measurements from 22kV all the way upto 34kV !!!

the 13.06 kV number probably sags a little towards 12kV, as i only had <1.2mA across each secondary. The label says 24mA max out. so i believe the 13kV is accurrate and precise.
Back to top
Patrick
Thu Dec 16 2010, 07:50AM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
UPDATE: New design.

I will update this design again for 200Hz to 10+ Mhz, in the coming days.

60kV @ DC-200 Hz.
1292485828 2431 FT102491 R Div1a
Back to top
1 2 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.