If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
"The left photo above shows an Americium sample (1 mCurie) showing a count of 80,180 CPM (counts per minute). The centre photo shows the majority of the radiation being blocked by a sheet of paper and the count dropped to 1250 CPM. The right photo shows thin Aluminium sheet dropping the count to 750 CPM. There is some gamma radiation from the Americium which may be accounting for some of this."
Registered Member #543
Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Some neutrons and positrons will be emitted when aluminium is bombarded with alpha particles. Aluminum-27 (13 protons plus 14 neutrons) will end up as phosphorus-30 (15 protons plus 15 neutrons), which has a half-life of 2.498 mins. The P-30 gives off a positron as it decays.
So it might just be possible to detect this transmutation at home, if you have the means to detect positrons such as a beta-sensitive GM tube. I guess experiments could start by wrapping the Am-241 source tightly in aluminium foil for a goodly period (what would be the optimum time?) and then immediately bringing the foil to the GM tube at the end of the irradiation period. A count graph plotted against time would then show if the decay fell off in the known half-life period of P-30 or not.
Registered Member #27
Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 02:20AM
Location: Hyperborea
Posts: 2058
I found this: Thickness of aluminium to absorb half of radiation Alpha 0.005 mm Gamma 80 mm
So my foil should halve the radiation 0.015 / 0.005 = 3 times. That means 1 / (2^3) = 1/8 of the radiation should get through. Which is close enough to my 1/10 reduction in brightness to be well within the accuracy of my measurements.
The density of glass and aluminium is quite similar, meaning that 2 mm would not pass a detectable amount of alpha radiation. My calculator just displays -E- when I try to calculate it.
Registered Member #543
Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Perhaps for the sake of certainty, the photographic experiment should be repeated exactly as it is, but without the phosphor material on the plastic film.
Registered Member #10
Joined: Thu Feb 02 2006, 09:45AM
Location: Bunbury, Australia
Posts: 1424
I've tried the aluminum foil experiment to see if P30 decay occurs. I left Al foil on the front of the detector and put the Am on top for 5 mins. There are 25cps through the Al. Removing the Am should allow any residual alpha, beta or gamma to be observed. However, the count drops within 1 second to the usual 0-4 cps background. So I don't appear to be seeing this effect. TDU
Registered Member #543
Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
When the Joliot-Curies discovered induced artificial radioactivity in aluminium bombarded wth alpha particles in 1934, they first used a cloud chamber to witness the effect, and confirmed this finding with a Geiger counter.
I don't know what sort of tube they used exactly (which they perhaps made especially for the experiment) but I do know that tubes used in that period were generally quite large - 30 cm or so long and 2 cm in diameter, making them much more sensitive than the much smaller types which are easy to get hold of today. I have a fairly sensitive mica end-window type, and will set it up over the next weekend to see if I can detect any residual activity from the aluminium myself. I'll see what effect I can get with a few different scintillators and my D50 whilst I'm at it.
Registered Member #27
Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 02:20AM
Location: Hyperborea
Posts: 2058
Perhaps for the sake of certainty, the photographic experiment should be repeated exactly as it is, but without the phosphor material on the plastic film.
I am all for increasing the certainty. Can you describe your idea in more detail?
I have the same effect as TDU when it comes to detecting radiation through a shield but I used a CCD chip instead of a geiger counter.
Registered Member #543
Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Bjørn Bæverfjord wrote ...
Perhaps for the sake of certainty, the photographic experiment should be repeated exactly as it is, but without the phosphor material on the plastic film.
I am all for increasing the certainty. Can you describe your idea in more detail?
I mean a control experiment that would use all the same procedures and methods, including the presence of the Am-241 source, but without the phosphor. This would help rule out any effect due to the direct irradiation of the CCD device in the camera, for example. You might also substitute the phosphor with known non-phosphors to be even more accurate.
Registered Member #27
Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 02:20AM
Location: Hyperborea
Posts: 2058
A thick IR/UV blocking filter had no significant effect on the light. A thin visible blocking filter blocked all the light. Finally the radiation source alone showed no effect with the same exposure time.
So it is 100% sure it is red visible light coming from the phosphor.
Registered Member #10
Joined: Thu Feb 02 2006, 09:45AM
Location: Bunbury, Australia
Posts: 1424
I have set up 3 Americium disks. The larger upper one is uncovered. The left lower has Strontium aluminate:Europium 2% and the right lower has ZnS:Ag? Each disc is 0.9 - 1.0 microCurie.
Second pic shows the bright smears of color. ie the whole of the fluorescent material is being activated. This has to be due to phosphorescence not irradiation. Exposure was 466 seconds ie nearly 8 mins. F 3.5 plus a magnifying lens to make the 3 disks fit on a full screen. However the ZnS disk does have a clear ring where the Americium is.
I will repeat this after leaving it in the dark for a few hours.
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.