Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 24
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
hvscrapper (40)


Next birthdays
11/11 Firefox (35)
11/11 ElectronicBob (38)
11/12 jake3085 (28)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Electromagnetic Radiation
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Eco from the Moon

1 2 
Move Thread LAN_403
Linas
Fri Oct 22 2010, 05:11PM Print
Linas Registered Member #1143 Joined: Sun Nov 25 2007, 04:55PM
Location: Vilnius, Lithuania
Posts: 721
HI, does any one know how to get the eco from the moon ? ( i need to measure distance to the moon)
I can only think about magnetron sending focused signal, and some how measuring with high speed oscilloscope resonance on LC circuit which is tuned with magnetron Fo.
Does any one have better and maybe simple idea ?
Back to top
Proud Mary
Fri Oct 22 2010, 05:34PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Laser reflectors left on the lunar surface by the Russian Lunokhod 2 and the American Apollo 15 missions are still functioning, and used for daily monitoring of the Earth-Moon distance.

Some radio hams communicate by using the Moon to reflect UHF signals back to earth.
Back to top
Sulaiman
Fri Oct 22 2010, 05:40PM
Sulaiman Registered Member #162 Joined: Mon Feb 13 2006, 10:25AM
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3140
Do you have a license to transmit ?

If not then you'll need a powerful laser, telescope and detector.
Back to top
Linas
Fri Oct 22 2010, 05:47PM
Linas Registered Member #1143 Joined: Sun Nov 25 2007, 04:55PM
Location: Vilnius, Lithuania
Posts: 721
ok, if we talking about lasers, how many power did i need?
Link2
So with magnetron i will send 60db and receive -157
so i can measure it, now just question how ?
Back to top
Proud Mary
Fri Oct 22 2010, 06:18PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Linas wrote ...

ok, if we talking about lasers, how many power did i need?
Link2
So with magnetron i will send 60db and receive -157
so i can measure it, now just question how ?

You need a large telescope - large by amateur standards - a 1.5m mirror - just to align the laser on the reflector. Then you need an even larger telescope to capture the returning pulse which may consist of only one photon.

Stick your chops into the Apache Point Observatory Lunar Laser-ranging Operation here:

Link2

This picture shows the terrible lonely journey of Lunokhod 2 across the desolate surface of the moon, and the final resting place of its laser reflector, where it remains to this day, a ghost of the Soviet Empire:


1287771301 543 FT0 Lunokhod 2 Tracks Final


Back to top
Linas
Fri Oct 29 2010, 08:40PM
Linas Registered Member #1143 Joined: Sun Nov 25 2007, 04:55PM
Location: Vilnius, Lithuania
Posts: 721
I see lot of videos in youtube that people can transmit sound and receive it and quite well , it 's called EME.
Link2
I get 400Wrms 9KV 7,4A peak Russian tube so i can transmit signal to the moon with high gain antenna, now just question left which frequency should i use ? 144MHz, 450MHz or 1,3GHz? (tube is up to 3GHz)
and also i need get at least 10W before tube amp ( that would be 20-80V amplitude driving signal), and still don't know how
Back to top
Proud Mary
Sat Oct 30 2010, 12:08PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
I have the impression that timing the return signal from our Moon with sufficient accuracy to calculate distance would require a rubidium standard or hydrogen maser clock.

And you can bet that all sorts of corrections have to be applied to the raw data too.

An old clockwork pocket watch used for timing horse races simply will not do! smile

Back to top
...
Sat Oct 30 2010, 05:56PM
... Registered Member #56 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:02AM
Location: Southern Califorina, USA
Posts: 2445
If you can get your hands on a q-switched Nd:YAG laser and a a pmt with a tight bandpass filter at 1064nm (or 532nm if you have a 532nm laser), it should be possible to get a bounce of the moon using a telescope as a beam expander.

You do not really need to worry about hitting the mirror head on, your beam will be huge by the time it hits the moon anyway. You also don't need to worry about the timing all that much, the round trip time is about 3s, you could use your computers sound card and get 4-5 sig figs.
Back to top
Sulaiman
Wed Nov 17 2010, 01:20PM
Sulaiman Registered Member #162 Joined: Mon Feb 13 2006, 10:25AM
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3140
Using radio at 450 MHz the path loss budget is about 220 to 250 dB for EME.
That requires a low noise receiver, a very good antenna, and lots of rf power.
I'm not at that level yet.
Back to top
Proud Mary
Wed Nov 17 2010, 02:23PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
... wrote ...

You do not really need to worry about hitting the mirror head on, your beam will be huge by the time it hits the moon anyway. You also don't need to worry about the timing all that much, the round trip time is about 3s, you could use your computers sound card and get 4-5 sig figs.



If only the astronomers at Apache Point Observatory Lunar Laser-ranging Operation had your brains, just think of the time and money that could be saved!

With all their costly equipment, and PhDs bought by the mile, they still seem to be having difficulties:

Lots of things have to be working just right to get photons back from the lunar reflectors. The laser beam has to be very well collimated. The laser beam must be pointing precisely at the reflector—which cannot be seen directly, so it's a blind pointing. The detector must also be looking at the exact spot on the moon corresponding to the reflector. This is independent from the laser pointing, so not guaranteed to be bang-on even if the laser is. Now the moon (when illuminated) is very bright. And we're looking for a mere few photons from the reflector. But we know the wavelength of the laser, and can let only that color light into the detector. We also know where on the moon the light is coming from, so we can reject all moonlight except for that right around the reflector. And most importantly, we know when to expect the laser pulse to return, to few-nanosecond precision, typically. So we only turn on our detector for 100 nanoseconds (100 billionths of a second) around the expected time. We can schedule this to nanosecond precision. We have about 50 shots on the way to or from the moon at any time, so we have a "schedule book" telling our equipment when to open up the detector. Imagine trying to keep your personal calendar commitments to nanosecond precision!

Extracted from "The Basics of Lunar Ranging" Link2


Back to top
1 2 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.