If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #2893
Joined: Tue Jun 01 2010, 09:25PM
Location: Cali-forn. i. a.
Posts: 2242
Alright, I did some DC offset testing and here's what I got;
With a 9V battery in series with the 5V function generator @5kHz (dc offset 9V) the readings were still 5V RMS. It appears DC offset does not bother the readings.
With the mains half wave rectified I got 61v.
It appears the meter overestimates voltages (5V = 7.5V) when it's measuring square waves, and underestimates triangle waves (5V = 4V). This is only when measuring RMS voltage, and not frequency. All waves measure the same to the freqmeter.
Registered Member #2099
Joined: Wed Apr 29 2009, 12:22AM
Location: Los Altos, California
Posts: 1716
Grenadier wrote ... It appears the meter overestimates voltages (5V = 7.5V) when it's measuring square waves, and underestimates triangle waves (5V = 4V). This is only when measuring RMS voltage, and not frequency. All waves measure the same to the freqmeter.
What is your reference for the actual RMS voltages of your square and triangle waves? Perhaps the function generator voltage knob sets the -peak- voltage. Can your function generator put out enough power to make a flashlight bulb glow, so its brightness can be compared with an identical bulb running on DC?
[edit, to reduce proliferation] The new meter and/or the borrowed Fluke meter might have an easier time measuring true RMS of sine, square, and triangle waves at 60 Hz rather than at 5 kHz.
Registered Member #2893
Joined: Tue Jun 01 2010, 09:25PM
Location: Cali-forn. i. a.
Posts: 2242
Actually I have no idea. I just assumed that when the function generator is set to 5V it puts out 5V RMS on all waveforms. Maybe the meter is measuring correctly, I don't really know. I wouldn't rule it out though since the freqmeter doesn't mind the waveforms.
I don't think the knob sets peak voltage, because a fluke (also on loan) measured 5V RMS for sine, but went nuts on the other waveforms.
Registered Member #618
Joined: Sat Mar 31 2007, 04:15AM
Location: Us-Great Lakes
Posts: 628
It sounds more like the meter takes a series of samples over a period of time, so perhaps try the DC offset with the square wave again but if you can try it with different duty cycles, and see if it gives a closer to 5v reading, since the triangle wave only gave you 4v and most likely only has a peak for maybe 10uS, where as the square wave (provided it has 50% duty cycle) read 7.5v and had 100uS on time. At some point the meter will ignore the offset and measure only the AC, or if your generator doesn't have a duty cycle adjustment try the square wave at higher frequencys to findout what the band pass actaul is.
Registered Member #1334
Joined: Tue Feb 19 2008, 04:37PM
Location: Nr. London, UK
Posts: 615
Klugesmith wrote ...
Nick: to use the RMS feature, you move the range selector to an AC scale. Is it then a surprise to get just the AC component of a mixed waveform? As your reference states, if the same signal gives a nonzero result on DC scale, you can externally do an RMS addition of the two readings.
Yup... I can just about turn my DMM to AC... The question centres around the definition of "True RMS". If its to be the DC equivalent voltage/current for heating purposes, then just using the AC component is not sufficient. Its disingenuous to suggest that because you are on AC you just get the AC component - if its a "True RMS" meter and does not have an "AC+DC" mode (see below) then what are you actually getting is not the "True RMS" value if the meter is capacitively coupled on AC ranges.
The DMM916 has several modes - A straight AC range, an AC+DC(offset) range, and then you can select either a TrueRMS reading or an Average AC reading. In TrueRMS mode, on AC+DC, it includes the square of the DC component along with the mean sum-of-squares of the AC part before taking the overall square root to get the final RMS value.
e.g. on the DMM916, a 1V P-P 50Hz sine wave with no DC offset from a Tek FG5010, reads 0.3428V on the AC range and 0.3492V on the AC+DC range. If I then add a +0.5V DC offset to that signal, The AC range still reads 0.3429V but the AC+DC range now gives 0.6210V. Which would you say is the "True RMS" value?
The bottom line is not what the manufacturer calls the type of reading, but whether the user understands what they are getting. Its one of those things that many are not clear about and, anyway, it probably not important for most as they are only dealing with periodic waveforms centred around 0V with a 1:1 duty cycle...
However, the tendency is for users to blindly trust the magic number that is displayed on their equipment without wondering how that value was arrived at... A sanity check is always a good idea .
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.