Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 50
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Barry (70)
Snowcat (37)
wylie (43)


Next birthdays
02/01 Barry (70)
02/01 Snowcat (37)
02/01 wylie (43)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Tesla Coils
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

most recent SGTC

1 2 3 
Move Thread LAN_403
modularduck
Sun Sept 05 2010, 11:21PM Print
modularduck Registered Member #3094 Joined: Tue Aug 10 2010, 03:12AM
Location: portland, or
Posts: 30
Hey all,
So i though i would share my most recent foray into the TC world. While i have built a couple of coils in the past it hasn't been for nearly 20 years. This coil was started after getting laid off and finding Deep Fried Neon. After a couple failed attempts at debugging ( i found there just wasn't enough info for me at DFN) I let it sit until recently i had the extra funds to get it back out and make it work for real. If anyone has suggestions about how to get it functioning better i would welcome them!

Here are the Javatc stats:
J A V A T C version 12.5 - CONSOLIDATED OUTPUT
September 5, 2010 4:15:14 PM PDT

Units = Inches
Ambient Temp = 68°F

------------------------------------------- ---------
Surrounding Inputs:
------------------------------------------ ----------
100 = Ground Plane Radius
100 = Wall Radius
100 = Ceiling Height

------------------------------------------ ----------
Secondary Coil Inputs:
------------------------------------------ ----------
Current Profile = G.PROFILE_LOADED
1.75 = Radius 1
1.75 = Radius 2
11 = Height 1
31.25 = Height 2
900 = Turns
24 = Wire Awg

--------------------------------------------- -------
Primary Coil Inputs:
------------------------------------------ ----------
Round Primary Conductor
3 = Radius 1
7.49 = Radius 2
11 = Height 1
11 = Height 2
8.9805 = Turns
0.25 = Wire Diameter
0 = Ribbon Width
0 = Ribbon Thickness
0.0088 = Primary Cap (uF)
24 = Total Lead Length
0.0641 = Lead Diameter

---------------------------------------- ------------
Top Load Inputs:
------------------------------------------ ----------
Toroid #1: minor=3.25, major=15.25, height=32, topload
Disc #1: inside=0.125, outside=7, height=32, topload

----------------------------------------- -----------
Secondary Outputs:
----------------------------------------- -----------
342.37 kHz = Secondary Resonant Frequency
90 deg° = Angle of Secondary
20.25 inch = Length of Winding
44.4 inch = Turns Per Unit
0.0024 inch = Space Between Turns (edge to edge)
824.7 ft = Length of Wire
5.79:1 = H/D Aspect Ratio
20.9953 Ohms = DC Resistance
23894 Ohms = Reactance at Resonance
1.01 lbs = Weight of Wire
11.108 mH = Les-Effective Series Inductance
11.755 mH = Lee-Equivalent Energy Inductance
11.474 mH = Ldc-Low Frequency Inductance
19.455 pF = Ces-Effective Shunt Capacitance
18.384 pF = Cee-Equivalent Energy Capacitance
29.426 pF = Cdc-Low Frequency Capacitance
5 mils = Skin Depth
15.622 pF = Topload Effective Capacitance
86.5903 Ohms = Effective AC Resistance
276 = Q

----------------------------------------------- -----
Primary Outputs:
----------------------------------------- -----------
342.38 kHz = Primary Resonant Frequency
0 % = Percent Detuned
0 deg° = Angle of Primary
24.66 ft = Length of Wire
4.09 mOhms = DC Resistance
0.25 inch = Average spacing between turns (edge to edge)
1.115 inch = Proximity between coils
1.1 inch = Recommended minimum proximity between coils
23.859 µH = Ldc-Low Frequency Inductance
0.0088 µF = Cap size needed with Primary L (reference)
0.8 µH = Lead Length Inductance
59.254 µH = Lm-Mutual Inductance
0.113 k = Coupling Coefficient
0.128 k = Recommended Coupling Coefficient
8.85 = Number of half cycles for energy transfer at K
12.82 µs = Time for total energy transfer (ideal quench time)

------------------------------------------- ---------
Transformer Inputs:
------------------------------------------ ----------
120 [volts] = Transformer Rated Input Voltage
9000 [volts] = Transformer Rated Output Voltage
30 [mA] = Transformer Rated Output Current
60 [Hz] = Mains Frequency
120 [volts] = Transformer Applied Voltage
0 [amps] = Transformer Ballast Current
0 [ohms] = Measured Primary Resistance
0 [ohms] = Measured Secondary Resistance

-------------------------------------- --------------
Transformer Outputs:
----------------------------------------- -----------
270 [volt*amps] = Rated Transformer VA
300000 [ohms] = Transformer Impedence
9000 [rms volts] = Effective Output Voltage
2.25 [rms amps] = Effective Transformer Primary Current
0.03 [rms amps] = Effective Transformer Secondary Current
270 [volt*amps] = Effective Input VA
0.0088 [uF] = Resonant Cap Size
0.0133 [uF] = Static gap LTR Cap Size
0.0231 [uF] = SRSG LTR Cap Size
50 [uF] = Power Factor Cap Size
12728 [peak volts] = Voltage Across Cap
31820 [peak volts] = Recommended Cap Voltage Rating
0.71 [joules] = Primary Cap Energy
245 [peak amps] = Primary Instantaneous Current
23.7 [inch] = Spark Length (JF equation using Resonance Research Corp. factors)
11.5 [peak amps] = Sec Base Current

----------------------------------------- -----------
Rotary Spark Gap Inputs:
------------------------------------------ ----------
0 = Number of Stationary Gaps
0 = Number of Rotating Electrodes
0 [rpm] = Disc RPM
0 = Rotating Electrode Diameter
0 = Stationary Electrode Diameter
0 = Rotating Path Diameter

---------------------------------------- ------------
Rotary Spark Gap Outputs:
----------------------------------------- -----------
0 = Presentations Per Revolution
0 [BPS] = Breaks Per Second
0 [mph] = Rotational Speed
0 [ms] = RSG Firing Rate
0 [ms] = Time for Capacitor to Fully Charge
0 = Time Constant at Gap Conduction
0 [µs] = Electrode Mechanical Dwell Time
0 [%] = Percent Cp Charged When Gap Fires
0 [peak volts] = Effective Cap Voltage
0 [joules] = Effective Cap Energy
0 [peak volts] = Terminal Voltage
0 [power] = Energy Across Gap
0 [inch] = RSG Spark Length (using energy equation)

--------------------------------------- -------------
Static Spark Gap Inputs:
------------------------------------------ ----------
3 = Number of Electrodes
0.75 [inch] = Electrode Diameter
0.125 [inch] = Total Gap Spacing

----------------------------------------- -----------
Static Spark Gap Outputs:
----------------------------------------- -----------
0.063 [inch] = Gap Spacing Between Each Electrode
12728 [peak volts] = Charging Voltage
10860 [peak volts] = Arc Voltage
38140 [volts] = Voltage Gradient at Electrode
86879 [volts/inch] = Arc Voltage per unit
85.3 [%] = Percent Cp Charged When Gap Fires
4.406 [ms] = Time To Arc Voltage
227 [BPS] = Breaks Per Second
0.52 [joules] = Effective Cap Energy
237600 [peak volts] = Terminal Voltage
118 [power] = Energy Across Gap
25.6 [inch] = Static Gap Spark Length (using energy equation)



I plan on changing the MMC by adding another row of 1600v .047uf caps to come closer to the recomendation of Javatc.
Also i plan on rewiring all of the connections with 10awg wire instead of the current 14 gauge stuff i had laying around.
I will most likely add a fun to the gap to quench it at some point though it seems to run fairly well without it.
A strike rail was part of my original build on this coil and i am going to add another once i get the coupling adjusted just right and get the tuning all worked out. 8" sparks aren't quite long enough to warrant it right at the moment.

1283728850 3094 FT0 Imag0050

1283728850 3094 FT0 Imag0051

1283728850 3094 FT0 Imag0052

1283728850 3094 FT0 Imag0054
Back to top
modularduck
Mon Sept 06 2010, 10:23PM
modularduck Registered Member #3094 Joined: Tue Aug 10 2010, 03:12AM
Location: portland, or
Posts: 30
So I replaced all the wiring with 10g and checked the tuning a couple times and can only muster about 12" streamers...I must say I am a bit disappointed with this. any ideas guys? perhaps a better torroid? perhaps some of it may be to dirty spark gap electrodes, my basement where i do most projects has been about 60% humidity and i noticed that the spark in the gap doesn't seem to move the way it used to so maybe a good cleaning and adjusting may be in order
Back to top
Sulaiman
Tue Sept 07 2010, 05:49PM
Sulaiman Registered Member #162 Joined: Mon Feb 13 2006, 10:25AM
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3140
As you seem to be using a static spark gap,
are you blowing enough air through it?
Probably the most critical part of a sgtc.

The arc should be blue/white and very loud/sharp sounding,quite thin.
If there is any yellow/orange or the arc is thick then forced air is required.
Back to top
modularduck
Tue Sept 07 2010, 06:56PM
modularduck Registered Member #3094 Joined: Tue Aug 10 2010, 03:12AM
Location: portland, or
Posts: 30
thats great info, the sparks are white in coloration but were a much more blue color originally so i will hook up a higher CFM fan and give that a shot i suppose i could just build a small manifold system and hook it to my little air compressor like i have seen here. THANKS! i appreciate the insight Sulaiman!
Back to top
quicksilver
Tue Sept 07 2010, 07:20PM
quicksilver Registered Member #1408 Joined: Fri Mar 21 2008, 03:49PM
Location: Oracle, AZ
Posts: 679
What type, brand, etc of capacitor do you have there?
I tried to make them out from the picture but I couldn't get in close enough.
Back to top
modularduck
Tue Sept 07 2010, 08:26PM
modularduck Registered Member #3094 Joined: Tue Aug 10 2010, 03:12AM
Location: portland, or
Posts: 30
Quicksilver

here is link to the caps on digikeyhttp://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?lang=en&site=US&WT.z_homepage_link=hp_go_button&KeyWords=495-3619-nd&x=0&y=0

I thought these would work as they are polypropylene caps perhaps i am wrong in that assumption. certainly if they are of the wrong type i didn't do very good designing of the MMC and will need to rebuild it. that certainly will affect the output from the secondary
Back to top
Herr Zapp
Wed Sept 08 2010, 06:09AM
Herr Zapp Registered Member #480 Joined: Thu Jul 06 2006, 07:08PM
Location: North America
Posts: 644
Mr. duck -

Please provide specific information (ratings or model number) of the Epcos capacitors you are using; your Digikey link is non-functional. It looks like they are probably metallized polypropylene pulse caps, but what is the voltage rating?

Did you look closely at the data in your JAVATC output file, especially the spark gap section? Assuming you are not using a variac to boost the input voltage to your 9kV NST, the peak output voltage, and the voltage your MMC charges to, is ~12.8kV. However, your two-segment spark gap (.063" gap spacing) has a firing voltage of only 10.8kV. Your gap is not allowing your cap to charge to the maximum supply value before it fires. Add at least two more copper pipe segmentso your static gap, and make sure that you have high velocity airflow directed through the gap segments. Make sure that your gaps are clean and free from oxidation (clean with #320 or #400 sandpaper).

Also, what is the value of the bleeder resistors in your MMC?

Be advised that your .0088uF tank capacitor value is what's termed a resonant value, and can result in extremely high voltages in the primary circuit that can destroy both the NST and the MMC. See Richie Burnett's extraordinary Tesla coil "Theory of Operation" website for a concise writeup on the dangers of resonant capacitor values: Link2
(Home page at: Link2

Finally, is that a funky little alligator clip that you are using as a primary tap??? After you change your primary wiring from #14 AWG to #10 AWG, and made all the primary wiring as short and direct as possible, make a better primary tap from a clip-in fuseholder, or a piece of copper strap with a pinch-bolt that will clamp it tightly around tour primary tubing for a tight, large-contact-area, low-resistance connection.

After optimizing the coil in its present configuration, increase the value of your MMC to around .014uF. This will prevent excessively high primary voltages due to resonant rise, and will also increase the energy dumped into the primary coil at every gap firing, which should further increase streamer length.

Properly tuned, you should be able to get 12-16 inch streamers out of this coil fairly easily.

Herr Zapp
Back to top
modularduck
Wed Sept 08 2010, 02:48PM
modularduck Registered Member #3094 Joined: Tue Aug 10 2010, 03:12AM
Location: portland, or
Posts: 30
Herr, the caps are 1600v .047uf 3 strings of 16, and after doing some research here i know i need to change it a bit and will be ordering additional parts to make this happen.

the bleed resistors are 1M 1/2w are these ok or should they be more in the 10M ohm range?

Adding additional electrodes to my spark gap is no problem as i am in the process of building a new one that is more adjustable. i will increase the number to 5 and cut the spacing down.

the primary tap is in fact a a fuse holder soldered to the end of the lead its just at a funky angle in t he photo from me monkeyin with it and stiffer older wire.

thanks for the link and the info! i really appreciate it! I'll get this sucker firing on all cylinders soon i hope.
Back to top
quicksilver
Wed Sept 08 2010, 04:45PM
quicksilver Registered Member #1408 Joined: Fri Mar 21 2008, 03:49PM
Location: Oracle, AZ
Posts: 679
The reason why I am interested is that common thought is that CDE caps are the MMC material of choice. Yet others have had good results with other manufacturers. Polypropylene manufacture is not the only criterion for a well functional MMC cap: very high dV/dt plays an important role.
The issue Herr Zapp brings up (resonant value) is extremely significant and if not heeded can result in damage to a NST in addition to poor performance.
The concept of NOT using a Variac to slowly introduce the power to the coil is a significant issue. You are not allowing anything but full Mains power to jump into your design. That issue alone can be very costly.

I am unsure if there are any "warning signals" as to the approach of Resonant Value. - So other than mathematical formula; the best idea is to heed that agenda.....although there may be some "warning signs". *
But again without a Variac you may not be able to see them coming! I had once heard that there was an audible "hum" or noise at a certain level but I have nothing what so ever to back that up. However that would only be available via the slow addition of power through such a variable transformer; otherwise the full power level would do whatever damage it would, with no available warning (if such a thing is anything but "hear say").

The addition of more gaps (5 in total as an example) allows several elements to take place. Additionally it will reduce noise, cool the sparks, & permit a wonderfully exercise in frustration to take place getting them all to be equal in length to be achieved. cheesey But seriously, it is a very significant issue when taking into account the material on Richie Burnett' site.


* The issue of "warning signs" came up from a discussion of putting together a SGTC with parts available rather than purchase of parts. So that tuning became a major feature & the ability to move from Resonant Value became all the more significant. The discussion of Resonant Value became more confusing due to the use of such issues as voltage alone ("the MMC should be the NST x 1.6880", etc) which I believe is a over simplification of the Resonant Value issue.
Back to top
modularduck
Thu Sept 09 2010, 12:30AM
modularduck Registered Member #3094 Joined: Tue Aug 10 2010, 03:12AM
Location: portland, or
Posts: 30
I redid the calculations on my MMC and if i add 2 more strings of 16 of the same cap it will bring my ohm loading to .0146 which should take me out of the danger of resonant capacitance as described. plus well seing 80 caps lined up should be fun to look at if nothing less.

I know of a local surplus shop that has a few old variacs so i will have to look into getting one. Too, I have been thinking that building a "terry filter' couldn't hurt, while I paid next to nothing for my NSTs I dont want to blow them up.

This brings me to another though, since I will need to adjust the MMC anyway, I would think that if i were to parallel the outputs of 2 identical NST this would increase performance no? perhaps I should just wait on that idea till I get all the bugs out of this one lol.

I hope to get the new adjustable spark gap built this weekend, provided I can gain access to my friends shop. I ran my new idea through Javatc and found that with 5 - .75" diameter electrodes with a total gap spacing of .153" will give me 99.2% charge on firing as opposed to what I have now of 85%. I am wondering if this is safe for the MMC, I noticed if I go over that total spacing I go over charge and get warnings from javatc, can someone exlain this to me? I would assume that its an issue of performance, i.e. that you want the gap to fire as close to 100% charge without going over and wasting charging time.

Thanks again guys for all your help! this is what happens when you let a low voltage guy loose on the HV world i suppose lol
Back to top
1 2 3 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.