Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 82
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Barry (70)
Snowcat (37)
wylie (43)


Next birthdays
02/03 Bauerb2 (35)
02/04 Fabio (45)
02/04 Corey (34)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Tesla Coils
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Toroids: Conventional vs. Pipe Sections

Move Thread LAN_403
UbuntuNinja
Thu Jul 15 2010, 01:27AM Print
UbuntuNinja Registered Member #2677 Joined: Mon Feb 08 2010, 03:06AM
Location: Palo Alto, California, USA
Posts: 64
I am building a medium power DRSSTC and need a 24"x6" toroid for the topload but can't afford to spend $350 on one but still want a toroid that is an interesting visual aspect of the coil as well as the actual electrical role so for a while I was stumped as to what I should do. However, after seeing the pipe toroid Finn Hammer used for his Thumper coil, I decided to try and apply the same technique to my coil. My question is as follows: is the capacitance of a toroid like Finn's equal to the sum of the capacitance values of the respective rings? If so, what is the cross section diameter of the whole toroid? Is it equal to the cross section of the individual pipe rings? Thanks!
Back to top
Kizmo
Thu Jul 15 2010, 10:04AM
Kizmo Registered Member #599 Joined: Thu Mar 22 2007, 07:40PM
Location: Northern Finland, Rovaniemi
Posts: 624
Im currently building similar toroid but instead of using few rings of thick pipe im going for several (30) rings of thinner round wire.

Few things about toroid surface integrity (or smoothness) are bothering me with this desing. Here is what i think after doing some testing and reading stuff from internet: (please correct me if im wrong)

- If toroid is small/medium size compared to rest of the coil it has to be very smooth

- Larger ROC allows rougher surface finish without losing performance (ring/wire mesh toroids etc)

Conclusion:

Toroid surface integrity is not critical if it has large enough ROC compared to height of an average surface features that are "sticking out" from imaginary perfect round surface. Other important thing is to desing toroid large enough that coil just barely power to break out with single streamer.

Btw toroid i started to build has major diameter of 150cm and minor 40cm :)
Back to top
HV Enthusiast
Thu Jul 15 2010, 11:30AM
HV Enthusiast Registered Member #15 Joined: Thu Feb 02 2006, 01:11PM
Location:
Posts: 3068
Just use corrugated heating duct from your local Home Depot. Works great.
Back to top
Killa-X
Fri Jul 16 2010, 01:50AM
Killa-X Registered Member #1643 Joined: Mon Aug 18 2008, 06:10PM
Location:
Posts: 1039
Awhile back ago I saw someone put plaster on corrugated heating duct. they did multiple layers and smoothed it out, and the finished project was a smooth toroid. They then covered it in aluminum tape, and it looked really nice. I cant recall the site name or who it was at this moment...

Just came to me. Wall Filler.
Link2

I have plans to try this out for my next coil :)
Back to top
Luca
Fri Jul 16 2010, 07:03AM
Luca Registered Member #2481 Joined: Mon Nov 23 2009, 03:07PM
Location: ITALY
Posts: 134
Is it really important using a topload with a completely smooth surface?

I know that a corrugated surface increases corona effect but I wonder if the actual performance is really affected by such increase of corona losses... mistrust

On the other hand, a smooth toroid is really cool! shades

Regards,

Luca
Back to top
Sulaiman
Fri Jul 16 2010, 12:13PM
Sulaiman Registered Member #162 Joined: Mon Feb 13 2006, 10:25AM
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3140
Usually a DRSSTC needs a breakout point - so a toroid with a rough corrugated surface is ok.
Back to top
HV Enthusiast
Fri Jul 16 2010, 12:39PM
HV Enthusiast Registered Member #15 Joined: Thu Feb 02 2006, 01:11PM
Location:
Posts: 3068
Luca wrote ...

Is it really important using a topload with a completely smooth surface?

I know that a corrugated surface increases corona effect but I wonder if the actual performance is really affected by such increase of corona losses... mistrust

On the other hand, a smooth toroid is really cool! shades

Regards,

Luca

Smooth toroids are not necessary. They do look better though.

Ed Wingate's famous magnifier use corrugated duct pipe covered with aluminum tape and rocked the house with at least 10-15 foot arcs, and i've seen individuals (photos) in Richard Hull's TCBOR group using things as diverse as Turkey Pans and Ventilation Caps for top loads.
Back to top
UbuntuNinja
Sat Jul 17 2010, 12:40AM
UbuntuNinja Registered Member #2677 Joined: Mon Feb 08 2010, 03:06AM
Location: Palo Alto, California, USA
Posts: 64
Kizmo wrote ...

Im currently building similar toroid but instead of using few rings of thick pipe im going for several (30) rings of thinner round wire.

Few things about toroid surface integrity (or smoothness) are bothering me with this desing. Here is what i think after doing some testing and reading stuff from internet: (please correct me if im wrong)

- If toroid is small/medium size compared to rest of the coil it has to be very smooth

- Larger ROC allows rougher surface finish without losing performance (ring/wire mesh toroids etc)

Conclusion:

Toroid surface integrity is not critical if it has large enough ROC compared to height of an average surface features that are "sticking out" from imaginary perfect round surface. Other important thing is to desing toroid large enough that coil just barely power to break out with single streamer.

Btw toroid i started to build has major diameter of 150cm and minor 40cm :)
As far as the size of the toroid vs the size of the coil and the effect on how smooth the thing has to be I think I am good. My seconday is roughly 6.25"x25". What is ROC? What is the chord/cross section diameter for a pipe toroid that is used in ScanTesla? How are you securing the wires to the frame of the toroid? The coil you are building the toroid for must be a monster!
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.