Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 25
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
No birthdays today

Next birthdays
11/27 Dax (42)
11/27 Mino (49)
11/29 Sonic (58)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: High Voltage
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Capacitive Voltage divider, for O-scopes (10,000:1)

Move Thread LAN_403
IntraWinding
Thu Jul 15 2010, 12:25AM
IntraWinding Registered Member #2261 Joined: Mon Aug 03 2009, 01:19AM
Location: London, UK
Posts: 581
Use a combination of resistors and a pot such that the pot just exceeds the maximum range of adjustment you need. That way the effect of its variation is minimised. It's also considered a good idea to connect the unused end of the pot to the wiper. It won't hurt and it might reduce noise.

If you use the shielding system explained by Fabio earlier in this thread, I think the division ratio should remain fairly constant with changing parasitic capacitance. You'll have to test it and see and perhaps increase the height of the shield if the division ratio is too susceptible to parasitic capacitance. But bear in mind that a parasitic capacitance might change the actual voltage you are measuring and don't confuse this with a change in division ratio!
Back to top
Patrick
Thu Jul 15 2010, 12:41AM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
IntraWinding wrote ...

Us a combination of resistors and a pot such that the pot just exceeds the maximum range of adjustment you need. That way the effect of its variation is minimised. It's also considered a good idea to connect the unused end of the pot to the wiper. It won't hurt and it might reduce noise.

yeah in the pic you see that leg left unconnected, thats becuase the drawing wouldnt let me put a juntion there. But in the prototype i make this week end i will cetianly tie that pin down, just as you have said.

IntraWinding wrote ...

But bear in mind that a parasitic capacitance might change the actual voltage you are measuring and don't confuse this with a change in division ratio!
thats a good point, ill remember that.
Back to top
Proud Mary
Thu Jul 15 2010, 01:18AM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Patrick wrote ...

ok , well i noticed that you used 4 fixed reistors for the lower limb of your divider but you have to be careful that the wiper or one of the lower resistor dont open, thus becoming a 75kv hazard at the low end. i dont have that as a possiblity so i will try that trim pot then. we will see.

That's why I have four stout resistors in parallel in a mechanically robust arrangement, and a Littlefuse CG2350L 350V gas discharge suppressor in parallel with them, but located inside the main tube, and going directly to earth. Not quite as unsinkable as the Titanic, I'm sure, but getting there... smile
Back to top
Patrick
Thu Jul 15 2010, 01:21AM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
i will commence construction this weekend as i am finnally out of school for the summer now. i still have issues with the tlo82cp texas instruments op-amp limits though, as intrawinding said.
Proud Mary wrote ...

Not quite as unsinkable as the Titanic, I'm sure, but getting there... smile
besides the Titanic seemed to sink just fine. cheesey
Back to top
IntraWinding
Thu Jul 15 2010, 02:03PM
IntraWinding Registered Member #2261 Joined: Mon Aug 03 2009, 01:19AM
Location: London, UK
Posts: 581
Patrick wrote ...

i will commence construction this weekend as I am finally out of school for the summer now. I still have issues with the TL082CP Texas instruments op-amp limits though, as IntraWinding said.

Great! This is a fascinating project - the very low input capacitance and shielding issues are outside my experience and I'm keen to see how you get on!

I think the improvement you got in performance by changing R6 from 10M to 1M is either due to a peculiarity of the simulation model that doesn't exist in the real product, or, if the model is super accurate, it's due to a poorly defined aspect of the way the op amp functions internally. The input devices are JFETs (Junction FETS) whose peculiarities I'm not familiar with, and additionally there may be protection circuitry not shown even in the detailed circuit diagram on page 9 of the data sheet Link2

If you put R6 back to 10M, change the capacitive division ratio to, say, about 1500 by increasing C2 and increase the op gain to bring the overall division ratio of the system back to 1000 I think the problem is completely solved. I don't think there is any significant price to pay for this approach although I guess it must raise the level of random noise a little, but I don't think that will affect you. I'm not sure if it will have a significant effect on bandwidth though as I don't understand what limits the upper frequency response. Hope this is of some help smile
Back to top
Patrick
Thu Jul 15 2010, 07:10PM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
only slew rate effects/limits my upper freq response.
Back to top
Proud Mary
Thu Jul 15 2010, 07:23PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Patrick wrote ...

only slew rate effects/limits my upper freq response.

How about a fast wide-band video amplifier Patrick?
Back to top
Patrick
Thu Jul 15 2010, 10:28PM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
those are super-fast but are they frequency specific or truly wideband? i have no experience with them.

NOTE: this is a good idea ProudMary has, but so far i cant find any that have more than 12 v output and most are lass than 8 volts. i would like +-15v output if possible.

i wonder i a single jfet could be configured for accurate signal representation?
Back to top
Proud Mary
Fri Jul 16 2010, 12:00AM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
I bought some AD8056 video amps a while back - 300 MHz, –3 dB Bandwidth (G = +1)1400 V/us Slew Rate, and inexpensive - because I wanted to preserve the geometry of some proportional counter signals, but I haven't gotten around to using them yet. But as you point out, they're low voltage devices.

There's no reason why should feel you have to use an IC, if one or more discrete transistors could serve just as well, or even better.

Back to top
Patrick
Fri Jul 16 2010, 12:06AM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
hmm... ill look at common source amps, and other transistor amp circuits. any suggestions?
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.