Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 78
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Barry (70)
Snowcat (37)
wylie (43)


Next birthdays
02/03 Bauerb2 (35)
02/04 Fabio (45)
02/04 Corey (34)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Tesla Coils
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

I am thinking of my own solid state Tesla Coil

Move Thread LAN_403
cavemen
Fri Apr 30 2010, 03:29AM Print
cavemen Registered Member #2008 Joined: Tue Mar 03 2009, 05:11AM
Location: USA, Frederick, MD
Posts: 118
I am working on three projects at once.
The project number one is the electronic control for the CNC machine.


I want to build a Tesla Coil that would use rectified 120VAC. A frequency generator will excite the secondary coil with a primary coil.

To know when the true resonance of the coil is, the machine would go through a range of frequencies, and than refine it until it decides that the coil is driven at resonance.

As I understand, the primary coil current consumption will increase when the coil is driven at resonance. Correct me if i am wrong.

So my powerful solid-state driven generator will be controlled by the chip.
If I am a novice in embedding and I want to solve this problem of tuning with an algorithm programed into the chip, WHAT IS THE EASIEST to program and MOST FIT FOR THE PURPOSE CHIP that I should use in my project? I would also like to know the numeric value of the frequency I am working with.

Can one chip do all the work or is it more efficient to use dedicated frequency generator, coder for the number display and the main microcontroller to tell what frequency to produce, take values in and display the frequency?
1272598185 2008 FT0 1 Approach

1272598185 2008 FT0 2 Approach
Back to top
HV Enthusiast
Fri Apr 30 2010, 01:16PM
HV Enthusiast Registered Member #15 Joined: Thu Feb 02 2006, 01:11PM
Location:
Posts: 3068
Sounds like a cool design. On the feedback, you're probably better off going with something along the lines of current feedback. With this type of tuning, you don't need any type of digital processing and its almost failsafe. Just look at some of the current feedback schemes that others have used for their DRSSTCs and SSTCs.
Back to top
Kipmans
Fri Apr 30 2010, 03:34PM
Kipmans Registered Member #91 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 03:03PM
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 45
A DSP-controlled TC would be pretty awesome though.
Back to top
cavemen
Sat May 01 2010, 05:51AM
cavemen Registered Member #2008 Joined: Tue Mar 03 2009, 05:11AM
Location: USA, Frederick, MD
Posts: 118
Any PIC controller that can do the job?
The reason why I am asking is because I am thinking of buying parts and building a programmer. I want it to be fairly universal for anything I build.

I am a total novice to the subject but I am sure that I will get it in the near future, as soon as I decide what I want to build.
I wonder if some eight-legged creature from the PIC family has enough processing power to take statistics.

--------
I had built a Mozzilini flyback driver, technically a SSTC. It uses two mosfets to excite a flyback from a TV.

Those thins are great.

Now I want to use innovation, make a device that can use 120V rectified to drive the priamry to make the primary more compact and power semiconductors smaller.
The primary will be printed right on the board with all the circuitry.

I want the device to tell me the resonance frequency of the secondary.

Sounds futuristic? Well I am just talking, but I need to get started.
Back to top
Turkey9
Sat May 01 2010, 07:20AM
Turkey9 Registered Member #1451 Joined: Wed Apr 23 2008, 03:48AM
Location: Boulder, Co
Posts: 661
I don't think a flat primary works very well with a SSTC. As I understand it, you need a lot better coupling.

As far as the PIC, if you get one with a PWM module, I'm sure you could get it to work as it has feedback and bridge drivers built in. You'll still need the driver chips to provide enough current, but the PIC will generate the signals. At 8 or 20 MHz it'll be fast enough as the Fres of your secondary would most likely be in the 100-300kHz range.
Back to top
HV Enthusiast
Sat May 01 2010, 11:14AM
HV Enthusiast Registered Member #15 Joined: Thu Feb 02 2006, 01:11PM
Location:
Posts: 3068
cavemen wrote ...

Any PIC controller that can do the job?
The reason why I am asking is because I am thinking of buying parts and building a programmer. I want it to be fairly universal for anything I build.

I am a total novice to the subject but I am sure that I will get it in the near future, as soon as I decide what I want to build.
I wonder if some eight-legged creature from the PIC family has enough processing power to take statistics.

--------
I had built a Mozzilini flyback driver, technically a SSTC. It uses two mosfets to excite a flyback from a TV.

Those thins are great.

Now I want to use innovation, make a device that can use 120V rectified to drive the priamry to make the primary more compact and power semiconductors smaller.
The primary will be printed right on the board with all the circuitry.

I want the device to tell me the resonance frequency of the secondary.

Sounds futuristic? Well I am just talking, but I need to get started.

If you're going the PIC route, forget about just a programmer.

Get the ICD-U64 from CCS. Its a low-cost In-Circuit USB connected Debugger / Programmer thats only $75.00. And also get one of the CSS PIC C Compilers. They have different options to fit any budget.

Back to top
wylie
Sat May 01 2010, 03:31PM
wylie Registered Member #882 Joined: Sat Jul 07 2007, 04:32AM
Location:
Posts: 103
I don't think a flat primary works very well with a SSTC. As I understand it, you need a lot better coupling.

I'd be more concerned about the price of a PCB big enough to have usefully-large-enough traces for that primary. How wide would those traces have to be? Seems simpler and cheaper to use wire IMO. Coupling isn't going to matter if the primary-traces get blown off the board on 1st-light wink

What's your target power level?
Back to top
cavemen
Sun May 02 2010, 01:56AM
cavemen Registered Member #2008 Joined: Tue Mar 03 2009, 05:11AM
Location: USA, Frederick, MD
Posts: 118
it isn't important how the primary would look like

all i want you to suggest me is a good PIC to use in my project

Are there any 18 pin PICs that have the processing power to "tune" the requency following some program of going through the range of frequencies and finding the one that gives out the most <correct me if i am wrong> resistance?

The chip should also give out a numeric value for the frequency and send it to LSD screen through a decoder.
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.