Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 83
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Download (31)
ScottH (37)


Next birthdays
11/03 Electroguy (94)
11/04 nitromarsjipan (2024)
11/04 mb (31)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Help with circuit design

1 2 
Move Thread LAN_403
IamSmooth
Wed Mar 03 2010, 04:11AM Print
IamSmooth Registered Member #190 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 12:00AM
Location:
Posts: 1567
I am taking a high voltage sinusoidal wave from my tank capacitor. The voltage can be as high as 600v and the frequency will be 50-150khz.

The voltage goes through a 100k/10w resistor and is clamped at 15v and -0.6v (diode drop). The problem is the output voltage is lagging the input signal. I am guessing this is a shift due to capacitance. The shift is gone if R is very low. The problem is I need a high R to keep the current low due to the high voltage. Is there anything I can do to reduce or eliminate the shift?

otherwise, I can adjust my calculation to account for the shift.
1267589481 190 FT0 Img 1049

1267589481 190 FT0 Img 1050
Back to top
radiotech
Wed Mar 03 2010, 04:48AM
radiotech Registered Member #2463 Joined: Wed Nov 11 2009, 03:49AM
Location:
Posts: 1546
Use a voltage divider and clamp the low voltage tap.
Back to top
IamSmooth
Wed Mar 03 2010, 05:16AM
IamSmooth Registered Member #190 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 12:00AM
Location:
Posts: 1567
Using a voltage divider, I believe, won't solve the problem. I will still need a large resistance to keep the current down with the divider, bringing me back to where I started.
Back to top
ScotchTapeLord
Wed Mar 03 2010, 06:40AM
ScotchTapeLord Registered Member #1875 Joined: Sun Dec 21 2008, 06:36PM
Location:
Posts: 635
A voltage divider with a variable inductor in series with the parallel resistor?
Back to top
Dr. Slack
Wed Mar 03 2010, 08:02AM
Dr. Slack Registered Member #72 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:29AM
Location: UK St. Albans
Posts: 1659
What are you doing with the signal at the "out" node? Why is phase shift a problem? Why are you clamping the output voltage?

If you are merely taking it to your scope to measure a reduced version of your input voltage, then you need a low value shunt resistor instead of the diodes, making a "voltage divider" with the input resistor. The low value resistor keeps the voltage low, and makes a low impedance to drive whatever stray capacitance you have with low phase shift.

I suspect though that this is a feedback path for your induction heater? What properties do you want it to have? It's easier to design a suitable circuit if we know what it has to do. You might be better off with a pure capacitive divider?
Back to top
IamSmooth
Wed Mar 03 2010, 12:31PM
IamSmooth Registered Member #190 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 12:00AM
Location:
Posts: 1567
Ideally:

no phase shift
output voltage clamped between 0 and 15v
high enough impedance so it does not affect the RLC induction heater tank

signal is going into one of the PLL inputs, which is why I need to clamp the voltage

As I said in the beginning, if the design is too complicated, I can adjust the constant I am using that relates the phase shift of the drive and capacitor tank signal.

I am curious why the shift is more evident with a higher R value?
Back to top
Sulaiman
Wed Mar 03 2010, 01:17PM
Sulaiman Registered Member #162 Joined: Mon Feb 13 2006, 10:25AM
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3140
You could try making a high impedance divider with capacitors and resistors,
e.g for 101:1 use 100k//100pF and 1k//10nF
Back to top
IamSmooth
Wed Mar 03 2010, 01:21PM
IamSmooth Registered Member #190 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 12:00AM
Location:
Posts: 1567
What is the purpose of putting the resistor and capacitor in parallel?

Also, Sulaiman, why do I see the shift more with higher resistance values? I would think if I was looking at a vector diagram with R on the horizontal, and C or L on the vertical, the phase shift would be more pronounced when R is smaller.

EDIT:

I have looked up information on phase shift topologies:

If my current voltage divider is the 100K reisistor (R1) and the high imedance of my input device (R2), there is a stray capacitance across my R1 resistor. I am guessing this is more evident at higher R values because the "capacitance" is not being shorted out.

Using this diagram and formula
Link2

couldn't I just put a higher C value (translating to a lower Xc) in parallel across my R which will lower ArcTan(R/Xc), and decrease the phase shift?
Back to top
klugesmith
Wed Mar 03 2010, 03:40PM
klugesmith Registered Member #2099 Joined: Wed Apr 29 2009, 12:22AM
Location: Los Altos, California
Posts: 1716
The lag in your picture could be created by just the capacitance of your oscilloscope probe.
100 k ohms x 12 pF is 1.2 us. In other words, the waveform is different when you aren't looking at it. smile

For design suggestions, it would help if we knew what your clamped waveform is for. And which current is the one you want to limit.

Along the lines of previously suggested voltage divider: to your circuit as drawn, suppose you add a 10K resistor to ground. Voltage and RC time constant are reduced by a factor of 11, and no current is significantly larger than what you started with.

[edit]
>>The problem is I need a high R to keep the current low due to the high voltage.
The high voltage is only across the large value series R. In existing circuit with +-600V applied, the clamp diode currents are limited to +- 6 mA and your series R dissipates 1.8 watts. You could reduce the 100K to 22K and not burn it up.
Back to top
Steve Conner
Wed Mar 03 2010, 03:55PM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
The basic solution to the problem is a small capacitor across the 100k, as others have pointed out. However the comment about scope probe capacitance is a valid one too.
Back to top
1 2 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.