Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 18
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Barry (70)
Snowcat (37)
wylie (43)


Next birthdays
02/03 Bauerb2 (35)
02/04 Fabio (45)
02/04 Corey (34)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Tesla Coils
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

MMC Capacitor Current Ratings

Move Thread LAN_403
UbuntuNinja
Wed Feb 24 2010, 04:37AM Print
UbuntuNinja Registered Member #2677 Joined: Mon Feb 08 2010, 03:06AM
Location: Palo Alto, California, USA
Posts: 64
When designing an MMC capacitor I know that when you put capacitors in series the voltage rating increases but does this effect the peak and RMS current ratings? If so how? I will be using CDE capacitors from either series 942C (http://www.cde.com/catalogs/942C.pdf) or 940C (http://www.cde.com/catalogs/940C.pdf), more likely 942C. If I do use the 942C series, I will be using the 2000VDC rated ones. Thank you.
Back to top
teravolt
Wed Feb 24 2010, 05:08AM
teravolt Registered Member #195 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 08:27PM
Location: Berkeley, ca.
Posts: 1111
since they are in series the current for all is the same for one. if they were in paralell the current rating would be the number of caps times the rating of one but the voltage rating is for one if all. all the caps have to have the same amount if capacitance. thats how big DRSSTC have large MMC banks using series parallel arangments
Back to top
UbuntuNinja
Tue Jun 29 2010, 11:59PM
UbuntuNinja Registered Member #2677 Joined: Mon Feb 08 2010, 03:06AM
Location: Palo Alto, California, USA
Posts: 64
teravolt wrote ...

since they are in series the current for all is the same for one. if they were in paralell the current rating would be the number of caps times the rating of one but the voltage rating is for one if all. all the caps have to have the same amount if capacitance. thats how big DRSSTC have large MMC banks using series parallel arangments

I am now designing another coil and rereading your reply to my post, I realized that I do not fully understand the information you provided. Do you mean that if a have a string made of capacitors rated at, for example purposes, 10 amps each, no matter how many capacitors are in the string the string will be rated 10 amps peak? And for strings in parallel the current rating would be 10 (assuming the answer to the previous question is yes) times the number of strings in paralell? Thanks for clarifying this for me!
Back to top
Goodchild
Wed Jun 30 2010, 04:06AM
Goodchild Registered Member #2292 Joined: Fri Aug 14 2009, 05:33PM
Location: The Wild West AKA Arizona
Posts: 795
Think of caps as batteries, they are very similar in that fact that:

If you connect batteries (or capacitors) in series you increase there voltage rating
example:
If you connect 2 12v batteries in series you will now have a 24V battery but, at the same current rating.
The same goes for caps if you connect 2 2000V caps in series you will make a 4000V cap and there current rating will stay the same.

If you connect batteries (or capacitors) in parallel you increase there amp/hour (capacitance) rating
example:
If you connect 2 12v 10ah batteries in parallel you will now have a 20ah battery but it will still be 12v.
The same goes for caps if you connect 2 2000V 1uF caps in parallel you will now have a 2uF cap but it will still have a voltage rating of 2000v.

So basically you series caps till you get the correct voltage rating, then you parallel strings of caps till you get the correct capacitance rating.
Back to top
UbuntuNinja
Wed Jun 30 2010, 05:35AM
UbuntuNinja Registered Member #2677 Joined: Mon Feb 08 2010, 03:06AM
Location: Palo Alto, California, USA
Posts: 64
Goodchild wrote ...

Think of caps as batteries, they are very similar in that fact that:

If you connect batteries (or capacitors) in series you increase there voltage rating
example:
If you connect 2 12v batteries in series you will now have a 24V battery but, at the same current rating.
The same goes for caps if you connect 2 2000V caps in series you will make a 4000V cap and there current rating will stay the same.

If you connect batteries (or capacitors) in parallel you increase there amp/hour (capacitance) rating
example:
If you connect 2 12v 10ah batteries in parallel you will now have a 20ah battery but it will still be 12v.
The same goes for caps if you connect 2 2000V 1uF caps in parallel you will now have a 2uF cap but it will still have a voltage rating of 2000v.

So basically you series caps till you get the correct voltage rating, then you parallel strings of caps till you get the correct capacitance rating.
Thanks for that. The battery analogy is an interesting and ingenious way of looking at the problem:-)
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.