Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 36
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Sync (33)
Grant-ZA (58)
FreakyG (56)
brtaman (38)


Next birthdays
04/23 Kipmans (35)
04/23 DuartmaN (48)
04/24 Jack (14)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Tesla Coils
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Another VTTC thread: pentode?

Move Thread LAN_403
Dr. Dark Current
Sun Feb 14 2010, 10:50PM Print
Dr. Dark Current Registered Member #152 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 03:36PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 3384
From what I've seen, people usually tie the screen and control grids together on larger pentodes and use it as a triode. Is this OK to do? I'd be afraid the control grid overheats because it is at a higher potential than it should be and rated just for little dissipation.
Or should I rather bias the screen grid from a few hundred volt supply through a large resistor and drive just the control grid?
Back to top
Myke
Mon Feb 15 2010, 01:30AM
Myke Registered Member #540 Joined: Mon Feb 19 2007, 07:49PM
Location: MIT
Posts: 969
I think it would be a good idea to drive the pentode the way it should be. The suppressor grid should be at cathode (or filiment if directly heated) potential. The screen grid should be a couple hundred volts above the cathode potential but it depends on what the datasheet says it needs. The control grid should be what you use to control the current through the tube.
The screen grid put at a couple hundred volts affects the current through the tube more than tying the grids together.
Tying the grids together and driving them as if it was a triode is fine. It shouldn't melt the control grid as long as you stay within the ratings of the control grid. It's best to drive the tube the way it was meant to though.
Back to top
Arcstarter
Mon Feb 15 2010, 03:51AM
Arcstarter Registered Member #1225 Joined: Sat Jan 12 2008, 01:24AM
Location: Beaumont, Texas, USA
Posts: 2253
I agree with Myke, it is a good idea to run it as it was intended. It is simple, but it could require an extra small transformer, or a resistive divider. Most pentodes seem to have an internally cathode-tied suppressor. With pentodes, running with enough voltage on the screen, it is higher gain than a triode so feedback takes less power. Like with these very high frequency coils, you might be able to use capacitively coupled feedback, like an antenna.

I have tied the grids together and used it as a control grid. It works, but it may not let the tube turn fully on...? It sure did not work as good as giving the grid the voltage suggested on the datasheet. Unlike the filament who's voltage is non-negotiable, you have some leeway with grid (and plate, but that is beside the point) so i have never killed a grid that way... But, it would probably not be too hard.

Good luck!
Back to top
Dr. Dark Current
Mon Feb 15 2010, 06:13AM
Dr. Dark Current Registered Member #152 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 03:36PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 3384
Thanks for the replies smile
I had another idea- connect the control grid to ground and drive just the screen grid, this should bring the grids to potentials close to what they should be during the conduction phase and still without any extra supplies.
Anyone thinks this is ok?
Back to top
Myke
Mon Feb 15 2010, 07:34AM
Myke Registered Member #540 Joined: Mon Feb 19 2007, 07:49PM
Location: MIT
Posts: 969
It would vary the tube's current a little but I would think it wouldn't be able to vary the current in the tube as well as the control grid. This is because the spacing between the screen grid's wires is a lot larger than the control grid's. I think the distance from the cathode/filament also has an effect on how much a grid can vary the tube's current but I don't remember why. It might have to do with the space charge.
There are some designs out there that modulate the screen grid but they aren't too common. I think that setup would most likely be used to modulate the output of an oscillator.
The screen grid's distances from the plate and cathode will be different from the distances for the control grid so the capacitances are different but I don't think it would matter in this case.
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.