Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 28
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Ultra7 (54)
uitvinderalex (36)


Next birthdays
09/30 Terrorhertz (15)
10/01 Avalanche (41)
10/02 Carl A. Willis (44)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: High Voltage
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Philips Optimus 65 X-Ray Transformer Saturation

1 2 
Move Thread LAN_403
dude_500
Mon Feb 08 2010, 11:45PM Print
dude_500 Registered Member #2288 Joined: Wed Aug 12 2009, 10:42PM
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 179
I have the opportunity to purchase a Philips Optimus 65 X-Ray Transformer at a good price and am wondering about saturation problems. It is stated to operate at 7000hz, 150kV at up to 65kW. I'll be using it at fractions of 1kW, so basically no load as far as the core is concerned. I've had x-ray transformers in the past that have saturated and are useless without full load. Does anyone have experience with this transformer to know if it will work without full load?
Back to top
Sulaiman
Tue Feb 09 2010, 01:14AM
Sulaiman Registered Member #162 Joined: Mon Feb 13 2006, 10:25AM
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3140
I have no experience whatsoever with x-ray transformers, but a fair bit with other types,
basic principles;
Current capbility is determined by heating of the wires so is (mostly) independant of voltage,
so whatever the voltage, your transformer can supply 65kW/150k = 433 mA.

For a given core cross-section and number of turns, V.F is constant for a constant magnetic flux,
so at 60Hz you can get 150kV x 60/7000 = 1.3 kV sad
Back to top
dude_500
Tue Feb 09 2010, 01:45AM
dude_500 Registered Member #2288 Joined: Wed Aug 12 2009, 10:42PM
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 179
I plan to run it at 7000hz not 60
Back to top
rp181
Tue Feb 09 2010, 03:05AM
rp181 Registered Member #1062 Joined: Tue Oct 16 2007, 02:01AM
Location:
Posts: 1529
Is there any chance your talking about the ones on fusor.net?
I live less than 20 min. from that guy, so I second the questions.

I think dude is trying to ask if there would be any problem running it at 1kW rather than the rated 65kW.
Back to top
dude_500
Tue Feb 09 2010, 03:09AM
dude_500 Registered Member #2288 Joined: Wed Aug 12 2009, 10:42PM
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 179
Yes I am... I asked him to test it but always nice to get a second opinion. All he has is an audio amp driving them so I'm not sure how comprehensive of a test he can do. I live where it would have to be shipped so I'd rather not just hope it'd work.

And yes, I want to run at 1kW not 65 (actually probably far less than even 1kW)
Back to top
klugesmith
Tue Feb 09 2010, 03:16AM
klugesmith Registered Member #2099 Joined: Wed Apr 29 2009, 12:22AM
Location: Los Altos, California
Posts: 1716
dude_500 wrote ...
...I've had x-ray transformers in the past that have saturated and are useless without full load.
Not sure what you mean by "saturated". The permissible maximum flux density in the core can be translated to a limit on "volt-seconds per cycle" or "volts per hertz". I don't see how reducing the secondary current can increase the magnetic flux density, IF the high-frequency driver maintains a fixed voltage and frequency. Unless there is a large I*R voltage drop in the primary winding under full-load conditions, enough to keep the volt-seconds below saturation.

There might be an issue with x-ray systems using self-rectification by the x-ray tube.
That results in significant DC current in the secondary loop, when tube is conducting.
So the primary winding is generally in series with a (diode in parallel with a resistor) to allow appropriate DC current to flow in primary & avoid saturation.
Back to top
dude_500
Tue Feb 09 2010, 03:31AM
dude_500 Registered Member #2288 Joined: Wed Aug 12 2009, 10:42PM
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 179
Klugesmith wrote ...

dude_500 wrote ...
...I've had x-ray transformers in the past that have saturated and are useless without full load.
Not sure what you mean by "saturated". The permissible maximum flux density in the core can be translated to a limit on "volt-seconds per cycle" or "volts per hertz". I don't see how reducing the secondary current can increase the magnetic flux density, IF the high-frequency driver maintains a fixed voltage and frequency. Unless there is a large I*R voltage drop in the primary winding under full-load conditions, enough to keep the volt-seconds below saturation.

There might be an issue with x-ray systems using self-rectification by the x-ray tube.
That results in significant DC current in the secondary loop, when tube is conducting.
So the primary winding is generally in series with a (diode in parallel with a resistor) to allow appropriate DC current to flow in primary & avoid saturation.


The last x-ray core I had which was 60hz was useless because if it was driven up to 110V primary, it would draw >2000W from the wall with zero secondary. This is what I mean by saturation. It couldn't be used effectively below it's dozens of KW rating.
Back to top
...
Tue Feb 09 2010, 04:03AM
... Registered Member #56 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:02AM
Location: Southern Califorina, USA
Posts: 2445
This is not saturation, for reasons that are probably not worth getting into. The current you are seeing is called the 'magnetizing' current, and is mostly reactive (or you could say has a power factor of about .01, or is drawing very little 'real' power, most of that 2KVA is being reflected back to the power company). Note the distinction between VA and W, a watt implies 'real' power, where as VA is just rms current multiplied by rms voltage--depending on the phase of the voltage and current these numbers are only the same for a power factor of 1.

That being said, it is a solvable problem, and the solution in the case of the large 60Hz transformer was probably as simple as adding a capacitor bank in parallel with the primary to help balance out all of the reactive power.

In the case of the 7000Hz transformer, you just need to design your driver correctly, there is no reason a large transformer can't be used at well under its rating (but you have to deal with the added cost/size of an oversized transformer, so it is rarely done)

Good luck!
Back to top
Proud Mary
Tue Feb 09 2010, 02:46PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
dude_500 wrote ...

The last x-ray core I had which was 60hz was useless because if it was driven up to 110V primary, it would draw >2000W from the wall with zero secondary. This is what I mean by saturation. It couldn't be used effectively below it's dozens of KW rating.

The Philips Optimus 65 requires a 3-phase ~400V supply Ipk 190A, but Islowblow <50A. An up-convertor to enable operation from 230V single phase is available as a costly optional extra.

The Optimus 65 has 111 user selectable 1kV steps ranging from 40kV/100uA, through to user selected permutations of 65kW i.e. 900mA @ 65kV and 433mA @ 150kV.

Back to top
dude_500
Tue Feb 09 2010, 08:14PM
dude_500 Registered Member #2288 Joined: Wed Aug 12 2009, 10:42PM
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 179
Proud Mary wrote ...

dude_500 wrote ...

The last x-ray core I had which was 60hz was useless because if it was driven up to 110V primary, it would draw >2000W from the wall with zero secondary. This is what I mean by saturation. It couldn't be used effectively below it's dozens of KW rating.

The Philips Optimus 65 requires a 3-phase ~400V supply Ipk 190A, but Islowblow <50A. An up-convertor to enable operation from 230V single phase is available as a costly optional extra.

The Optimus 65 has 111 user selectable 1kV steps ranging from 40kV/100uA, through to user selected permutations of 65kW i.e. 900mA @ 65kV and 433mA @ 150kV.



I won't be using the big 3-phase 400V driver though, I already have a small MOSFET driver based on the IRS2453 chip that can drive up to about a kilowatt max. The sale is only for the transformer, not all the driver circuitry.
Back to top
1 2 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.