Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 50
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Download (31)
ScottH (37)


Next birthdays
11/03 Electroguy (94)
11/04 nitromarsjipan (2024)
11/04 mb (31)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

where did the energy go?

Move Thread LAN_403
Mattski
Mon Jan 25 2010, 02:28AM
Mattski Registered Member #1792 Joined: Fri Oct 31 2008, 08:12PM
Location: University of California
Posts: 527
IamSmooth wrote ...

In the water column example, potential energy is M*g*h.

What is the integral of the potential energy?
I didn't explain myself well enough. For each particle of mass m in the column, it will have a potential equal to m*g*h, where h is the height. For any given height, every particle on that plane will have the same PE, so multiply by the cross-sectional area of the column for the total PE of water at that height. Let M = m*A, so PE as a function of h is M*g*h. Now each of these thin planes of water is at a different PE, because they are at different heights. Integrate the function M*g*h with respect to h, between h=0 and h=h1, where h1 is the height of the column. You then get a total PE of 1/2*M*g*h^2.

Radiotech: in this two capacitor problem, energy is indeed conserved. However, some of initial electrostatic potential energy will be converted into heat through parastic resistance, or flow out of the circuit from radiation. A Marx Generator is a different system because you are not moving energy between the capacitors. If you do the calculations for two caps of size C with voltage V, E=1/2*2*C*V^2 = C*V^2. When you put them in series, voltage double, and there is now only one capacitor of half the size, so E=1/2*(C/2)*(2V)^2 = CV^2 as before, so no energy moved anywhere.
Back to top
radiotech
Mon Jan 25 2010, 03:40AM
radiotech Registered Member #2463 Joined: Wed Nov 11 2009, 03:49AM
Location:
Posts: 1546
I see your point on the Marx. How about an experiment with too circular plates made like a folded up fan,ie an insulated shaft could
open up the fan plates to increase the area facing when the device was charged at say A1 to A2, A being area, yet maintaining constant separation, the voltage between the plates will drop, the energy in the condenser maintained and the work in expanding the area, torque * distance per unit time, should equal the temperature rise in the metal plates due to charge redistribution. But if the process was adiabatic and the plates did not increase in temperature, would the voltage between the plates change disproportionately indicating the mechanical energy was being stored?

As an aside I have a wind-up charger for a dosimeter, which is an electrostatic generator, and like a Van de Graf column needs work to turn the belt pulley.

That old 2 capacitor problem is akain to the arguments in explaining how the electrophoresis works, considering the work needed to lift the handle.

Fun stuff that gets serious in these days of nanotechnology where at that size the electric forces are a hugh factor.
Back to top
Mattski
Mon Jan 25 2010, 04:13AM
Mattski Registered Member #1792 Joined: Fri Oct 31 2008, 08:12PM
Location: University of California
Posts: 527
In the case of time-varying capacitance what matters is conservation of charge. If there is no conduction path (no current in or out), then the net charge on the + and - plates will remain constant. So if capacitance halves, Q=CV, so voltage must have doubled for charge to remain constant. But since E=0.5CV^2, that operation will double your energy. So you had to do work equivalent to what was in the capacitor. Equivalently, if capacitance doubles, the voltage halves, and the capacitor is charging half the energy it used to be.

You can actually make a generator using this principle if you want to. It takes a fair amount of effort though to get any useful kind of power density.
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.