Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 52
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Download (31)
ScottH (37)


Next birthdays
11/03 Electroguy (94)
11/04 nitromarsjipan (2024)
11/04 mb (31)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Schottkys in parallel

1 2 
Move Thread LAN_403
IamSmooth
Mon Jan 18 2010, 09:04PM Print
IamSmooth Registered Member #190 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 12:00AM
Location:
Posts: 1567
if I have one schottky diode that can handle 30A, can I put two in parallel for 60A? These are ultra-fast for blocking the body diode of a mosfet. I just need to know so I can order some; otherwise, I need a bigger, single diode.
Back to top
Zeus
Mon Jan 18 2010, 09:40PM
Zeus Registered Member #2316 Joined: Tue Aug 25 2009, 03:04AM
Location: Bendigo, Australia
Posts: 107
Just remember what happens to capacitance in parallel. If the circuit is capacitance
critical I wouldn't advise you to.

[Edit: typo]
Back to top
101111
Mon Jan 18 2010, 11:15PM
101111 Registered Member #575 Joined: Sun Mar 11 2007, 04:00AM
Location: Norway
Posts: 263
It works, go for it.
Just make sure the wirering give same amount of current to both devices.
Back to top
Myke
Mon Jan 18 2010, 11:30PM
Myke Registered Member #540 Joined: Mon Feb 19 2007, 07:49PM
Location: MIT
Posts: 969
I don't know how good the current sharing is on schottky diodes but I would still derate the parallel diodes so that one doesn't see 40A while the other only sees 20A.

You could test out how well they share current by measuring the current through both diodes at the same time. I'm not sure how much voltage a single meter would drop across it though.
Back to top
radiotech
Mon Jan 18 2010, 11:57PM
radiotech Registered Member #2463 Joined: Wed Nov 11 2009, 03:49AM
Location:
Posts: 1546
I you laid out the pcb with the diodes spaced apart lengthwise on a pair of traces and connected your object circuit to a point centered between them you might be able to get load sharing by shifting the
center between them while watching on a scope. Consider a (microstripline as well as) series resistance balast that is used to
force parallel stuff with nonlinear e/i slopes to share.
Back to top
MinorityCarrier
Tue Jan 19 2010, 12:39AM
MinorityCarrier Registered Member #2123 Joined: Sat May 16 2009, 03:10AM
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 312
I believe silicon tempco makes paralleling silicon diodes not as effective as you'd like. One diode is almost certain to conduct more than the other.

Be sure the reverse breakdown voltage of your schottkeys is high enough.
Back to top
IamSmooth
Tue Jan 19 2010, 01:04AM
IamSmooth Registered Member #190 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 12:00AM
Location:
Posts: 1567
I think I will go with Mouser's 844-63CPT100

It is 60A/100v reverse

I will incorporate this into my design unless someone thinks this one is not appropriate.
Back to top
Andri
Tue Jan 19 2010, 02:01AM
Andri Registered Member #1533 Joined: Wed Jun 11 2008, 02:13PM
Location: Reykjavík, Iceland
Posts: 46
PN-junctions such as diodes have a negative temperature coefficient. I.e. conductivity increases as current rises. This may lead to one diode conducting considerably more current than the other just because it was warmer to begin with. You could think of this as positive feedback.

Most devices (such as resistors) have PTC so the current share is regulated by resistance increasing with increased current, thus shifting the current over to the cooler resistor, ad infinitum. You can think of this as negative feedback.

It may well be that the diodes in question have enough series resistance to counter the effect, so that the PTC overcomes the NTC but you're better safe than sorry.
Back to top
hboy007
Tue Jan 19 2010, 12:00PM
hboy007 Registered Member #1667 Joined: Sat Aug 30 2008, 09:57PM
Location:
Posts: 374
I've paralleled two 40V schottky diodes when I modified an ATX power supply for 0.8 .. 5V @ 50A output. It was just a quick&dirty mod and I didn't consider resistive or inductive balancing because there was just the place for one more diode in the layout (maybe they mount these for higher power though). They are to some extent balanced by their logarithmic forward voltage drop but this requires pairs that are well matched over the given temperature range. I guess I was just lucky. Maybe the small heat sink helped because the diodes were located next to each other and heated at similar rates.

If the diodes are used in a switching topology, the forward voltage drop characteristics are even more pronounced due to the higher current pulses. Resistive balancing would introduce further losses but you could try a bifilar wound choke with a few 100nH to µH (frequency dependent, of course) to couple the currents.
Back to top
Steve Conner
Tue Jan 19 2010, 12:12PM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
As I said in Iamsmooth's other thread (wish he wouldn't keep starting new ones at random) many of these dual schottky diodes are rated for parallel operation. The datasheet usually says "suitable for parallel operation."

The tempco is negative, sure, but the two diode dice are soldered to the same tab, keeping them at nearly the same temperature.
Back to top
1 2 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.