Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 27
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
No birthdays today

Next birthdays
05/27 Daniel Davis (54)
05/29 Zonalklism (34)
05/29 Dr Hankenstein (68)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Chemistry
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

HHO Generation - Bubbler

1 2 
Move Thread LAN_403
jared555
Sat Oct 24 2009, 09:04AM Print
jared555 Registered Member #1864 Joined: Tue Dec 16 2008, 09:30PM
Location: Clinton, IL
Posts: 2
To get the general warnings out of the way (yes I appreciate them, if I missed something let me know).... I have done research into HHO generation, don't plan to store any significant quantities of it, understand that I believe 20mJ of energy is all it takes to start ignition, and know that if i do wish to ignite any significant quantities I better be a good distance away (preferably while filling the balloon or whatever as well), and to never operate the equipment indoors.

I have recently been prescribed oxygen at night with a humidifier. Looking at the humidifier itself it looks like it is basically the same design as most of the HHO generator bubblers I have seen.

As I have considered building an HHO generator for fun (maybe eventually playing with the vehicle stuff but not for a long time) it made me wonder, if running almost pure O2 through about 3-4" deep water makes a noticeable difference in humidity (irritation/pain from dry air vs humidified), how much water vapor/humidity is actually coming out of most people's generators?

There are things I mainly am curious on....
1) How much vapor is coming out of an average system? and depending on how significant:
2) Will running it through a distillation rig cause the vapor to condense (and how much reduction would there be)
3) Are there other options that can be made to remove water vapor without significantly increasing the risk of an explosion?

I know there are better people to ask this but the question just came to me as I am trying to get to sleep at 4AM. Hopefully this also will reduce any harassment on spelling, phrasing, etc. but I doubt it :)
Back to top
Bjørn
Sat Oct 24 2009, 11:00AM
Bjørn Registered Member #27 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 02:20AM
Location: Hyperborea
Posts: 2058
You are off by afactor of about 1000 on the ignition energy, it is closer to 20 uJ. (micro joule).

You should assume that you will have an explosion and design your apparatus such that it can handle it safely. If not you might get showered by supersonic pieces of glass,

How much water will be in your gas depends on a lot of factors, there is also a large uncertainty about tiny droplets contained in the gas. To be sure you should test it, just mark the water level and let it run for 24 hours and see the difference.

Yes, condensation will help a lot, how much depends on the temperature you use. There are other methods, it depends on how dry you need it to be and the volume needed.

If at all possible, store the hydrogen and oxygen separately, you are asking for trouble if you mix them before needed.
Back to top
rp181
Sat Oct 24 2009, 04:00PM
rp181 Registered Member #1062 Joined: Tue Oct 16 2007, 02:01AM
Location:
Posts: 1529
Be very careful about the ignited gas getting back into the cell. One of mine did, and blew up (I used NaOH so I got a couple of chemical burns.
My gen two used several methods. The cell was in a PVC shell, the gas went through a bubbler directly, then a piece of foam, then through 2 loops of tubing with water at the bottom, through the major length of the tubing, through another flame arrestor, and finally a flow choke. If it struck back, it never got past the first flame arrestor.

Arrestors are fairly good at removing vapor, a PVC tube filled with foam may work well.
Be careful of using metal chambers, look into hydrogen embrittlement.
Back to top
Proud Mary
Sat Oct 24 2009, 04:07PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Link2
Back to top
jared555
Sun Oct 25 2009, 06:48AM
jared555 Registered Member #1864 Joined: Tue Dec 16 2008, 09:30PM
Location: Clinton, IL
Posts: 2
Bjørn wrote ...

You are off by afactor of about 1000 on the ignition energy, it is closer to 20 uJ. (micro joule).

This was an error due to the combination of the time of the day and a mix of prescription medications and caffeine, I did mean micro joule.

Thanks for the warnings again and I have seen videos of what has happened with people blowing up their cell or using a !metal! container to store the gas.

Would there be any point in adding something along the lines of a rupture disk or just flame arrestors, etc.
Back to top
klugesmith
Mon Oct 26 2009, 06:35PM
klugesmith Registered Member #2099 Joined: Wed Apr 29 2009, 12:22AM
Location: Los Altos, California
Posts: 1716
You might just design the cell to contain any HHO explosion, if you can look up or compute the maximum pressure (with no initial compression). A rough guess is on the order of 100 psi. Could be locally, momentarily higher because of pressure wave reflections / detonation behavior.

One reference is pages 7 and 8 of Link2
But I just noticed that its focus is on H2-Air mixtures. H2-O2 mixtures could achieve a bit more than twice the energy release per unit volume; that factor would be divided between a larger temp. ratio and a larger pressure ratio.
Back to top
Bored Chemist
Mon Oct 26 2009, 07:49PM
Bored Chemist Registered Member #193 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 07:04AM
Location: sheffield
Posts: 1022
If I set fire to a mixture of H2 and O2 it will explode- the flame will reach roughly 2600C. The pressure will rise in rough proportion ot the absolute temperature, so about 10 fold. The peak pressure will be something like 150PSI.
Now have a look at this page and see what that sort of overpressure might do.
Link2
I know it's only a little explosion, but that might be all it takes.
Incidentally, the answer to the original question is that the gas mixture will be saturated with air (and carrying some more as spray). At room temp that's something like 3% v/v
Back to top
rp181
Mon Oct 26 2009, 10:00PM
rp181 Registered Member #1062 Joined: Tue Oct 16 2007, 02:01AM
Location:
Posts: 1529
Note that the pressure is not the only determining factor, the flame front speed is very important. Hydrogen Oxygen reactions have very high flame from speeds, and will often reach DDT, or deflagration to detonation, depending on your chamber design. DDT puts very high stresses on a chamber.
I was only saying that for info, A chamber capable of 150 PSI would probably suffice (I would go 300), DDT becomes a problem with repetitive detonations.
Back to top
klugesmith
Tue Oct 27 2009, 12:09AM
klugesmith Registered Member #2099 Joined: Wed Apr 29 2009, 12:22AM
Location: Los Altos, California
Posts: 1716
Now have a look at this page and see what that sort of overpressure might do.
Link2 The part about overpressure calculation (explosive) is, by a large margin, the most lame and weakly presented section I have ever seen on Wikipedia! A formula is stated with no units of measurement for W and v, no dependence on the explosive material, and the wrong name (Wiebull). S/b Weibull, not the Weibull of probability science but Ann Weibull, who measured explosions within blast containment structures. Link2

Then we move to the table: Does not give adopted explosive quantities or containment volume. Does not address conversion of listed explosive materials to TNT equivalent. (and what is potassium chlorate doing in a column with explosives?) The right column gives overpressure effects taken from some completely different reference ... aha! The cited reference is a 9/11 conspiracy film. That could explain all the stupidity, so I'll say no more.

Rich

[edit] A better reference for air blast effects is tables 4.2-1, -2, and -3, on pages 73-75 of this big document: Link2 . That's the best I could come up with today, based on an old memory of an effect level called "incipient small mammal damage". Not that any of this has much to do with explosion of HHO in gram quantities. smile
Back to top
Proud Mary
Tue Oct 27 2009, 04:52AM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
I am locking this thread since the consensus of experienced members is that the experiment clearly exceeds the hazard limit with which 4HV.org wishes to be associated

Harry.
Moderator
Back to top
1 2 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.