If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #1497
Joined: Thu May 22 2008, 05:24AM
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 801
Fake sized capacitors, fake sized rechargable batteries (I usually order from for anything I want to work well), fake chokes....
We've all heard of counterfeit power semiconductors too, it'd be something like a 40% rated die in the same package as the part is marked as, but they get a huge markup. The problem is the factories are completely in on it too for power semiconductors, since its easier to make the die and case it, then falsely advertise it, than to remove dies from already manufactured parts. Contrast this to battery or capacitor fakes where someone can take a legitimately marked cap, and repackage it. The best thing we can do is to simply not order from them and not give them income (but they still end up getting orders from manufacturers who try to cut corners).
Registered Member #30
Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
Fake transistors are not (quite) made by the same companies as make real ones. In order to explain this, I need to write a little about how the semiconductor industry works.
The hard part of semiconductor manufacturing is making the actual dice. This is done by super-secret proprietary processes in fabs in the USA and Europe. The makers try to keep their processes and recipes secret so that they can keep prices high, bring the revenue home and not have the Chinese copy it.
The bare dice are then sent to other plants to be packaged. Packaging is much easier than making the dice in the first place, so it's subcontracted to plants in China, the Philippines, and so on. It's from these packaging plants, not the actual fabs, that the fake devices come, and the fakery lies in labelling a cheap die as a more expensive device. They have all the machinery to package and label dice, so it must be really tempting to grab a bunch of old 2N3055 reject dice that someone pulled out of a dumpster and package them up as MJL3281s.
It's easier still to get ready-packaged devices and relabel them as a better transistor than they really are. Just get a bunch of old 2N3055s, buff the old logo off, and screenprint them with "ON Semi MJ15024" or whatever. You could do this at home.
Fakes typically target the repair tech and hobbyist market, because no self-respecting OEM would be fooled. I've tested suspected fake MOSFETs that were sent to me by other 4hv members, but they turned out to be genuine as far as I could tell.
Registered Member #543
Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
IntraWinding wrote ...
Is there somewhere you can report these various fakes to?
Fake transistors would be a breach of someone's intellectual property rights, I guess, but things like the big-looking capacitor with a pint-size one inside, or the "C" cell packaged in a "D" cell case, are no more than common or garden marketing strategies that you will find in any supermarket - the jar of peanut butter carefully shaped to give the impression that it contains more than it does, the big drum of health pills that is less than a quarter full once the wadding is taken out, the indented bottoms of liquor bottles, and so on.
Registered Member #2161
Joined: Fri Jun 05 2009, 03:36PM
Location:
Posts: 247
Unfortunately the PSU wasn't manufactured on April 1st. Would have been the funniest thing.
I think, as Steve McConner put it, it is a giant case of fuck it. With monetary motivation.
Too bad I don't have an LCR meter, 1-9H? Those capacitors are hilarious, have to check the caps that came in this Top Quality PSU. Fake caps would really complete the deal.
Registered Member #2123
Joined: Sat May 16 2009, 03:10AM
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 312
In the discrete semiconductor mfg industry, processes aren't so secret, just patented. Companies routinely de-process each others parts to see if: A. A home company's patent is being violated, and B. How'd they make that part perform like that?
Pirating in China is carried out to a high art, including actual wafer fabs making pirated parts.
At my company, fake APT parts were found coming out of China. They contained functional mosfet die, but not ours. Our photomasks contain certain logos and patterns for a given part that were missing from the die in the fake parts.
When I worked at Zilog, there were counterfeit Z80 uC's coming from a fab in East Germany. The wall fell and soon after Zilog lawyers came knocking at their door. That fab ended up providing foundry service for Zilog.
Registered Member #480
Joined: Thu Jul 06 2006, 07:08PM
Location: North America
Posts: 644
Brtaman -
That's a really a great example of how widespread the fakery is. As you noted, the bobbin is specifically manufactured with the integral rib to anchor the fake loop of wire; it could never be used to wind a "real" choke.
Here are some additional photos showing just how bad the Chinese counterfeiting problem is. These parts showed up in a consumer audio product I investigated earlier this year.
The part in question is a low-power FET; I forget what the package designation is, but it's physically TINY.
(EDIT: It's the SOT-23 package, about 1.6 X 2.9mm)
The first photo shows a legitimate part, manufactured by ON Semi. All the characters and dots have significance in identifying the P/N, date, manufacturing facility, etc.
The remaining photos are all of the same part, a part that "sort of" worked, but the operating charecteristics were so far out of spec that circuit did not function properly. With casual inspection under a stereomicroscope, the parts appeared to have all the correct markings. However, out of many "defective" parts I inspected, I found ONE that had what appeared to be residual sanding marks (as in sandpaper!!!) on the top surface, that had been laser-engraved AFTER the sanding! Closer inspection, using a high-angle, highly specular lighting, revealed TWO sets of laser-markings. The original markings had been almost completely "sanded off", and then re-engraved. Closer inspection of all the defective parts revealed that the top surface of the parts was not the original "as-molded" surface, and that the laser engraving was much deeper (poor power control) than known "authentic" parts.
If you look closely, you can just barely see the remains of the original markings (first two characters were "RA"). The lighting on the various photos has been adjusted to highlight the "new" laser markings, the "original" laser markings, and the "sanding" marks. More involved functional testing revealed that all the "sort of" working parts were counterfeit.
Bear in mind that these parts are tiny, just slightly larger than a grain of rice. Can you imagine some place in China where a room full of people are hand-sanding the markings off these near-microscopic SMT parts, securing them in some sort of holding/feeding fixture, and then using a $100K laser engraving system to add new markings?? And all this when the cost of NEW, AUTHENTIC parts is only a few cents each?????
Registered Member #480
Joined: Thu Jul 06 2006, 07:08PM
Location: North America
Posts: 644
dr electrons -
You wrote:
"It seems odd that the inspectors don't really care about things like say, a direct phase to phase short of a 480v line. If this is the way "CE" operates, this is the reason for your fake choke! Simply there to make an appearance! I would agree the reason is based on money. Thats what all the big firms like "UL" "CE" "DVC" really care about. At 400 to 500 dollars for a "UL" sticker, what do they care if a product fails and takes out a whole family? I personally do not trust any components that are marked anymore than ones that are not."
I'm afraid that you may not have any awareness of what you are talking about.
Product safety certification (through UL, TUV, Nemko, CSA, etc) is VERY serious business, both to product manufacturers, and to the safety certification organizations. The certification organizations are extraordinarily meticulous and thorough in their testing and periodic product and manufacturing process auditing, which is why the costs of product safety testing are so high. I can assure you that the overwhelming concern of any of these organizations is that products bearing their logos ARE safe, and have been subjected to exhaustive testing to demonstrate that the product meets all applicable safety standards.
The "fake choke" issue is primarily an EMC issue, not a safety issue. The EMC certification orginazations don't care what's IN the product, they are concerned with the product's EMC performance. That is, does the product generate electromagnetic emissions (radiated or conducted) that could adversely affect other nearby electronic devices, and is the product's operation adversly affected by electromagnetic radiation from other electronic devices, or from natural electromagnetic phenomona like ESD. As long as the product meets the appplicable EMC standards, the certifying organization doesn't care if it has a marginally effective choke, or a fake choke, or no choke at all.
A product manufacturer can face MILLIONS of dollars in costs (fines, recalls, etc) if products in the field are found to be non-compliant with either safety or EMC requirements; that's why both safety and EMC testing are taken so seriously. Having personally witnessed the repercussions of both EMC and safety failures of products in production, I can assure you that the sh*t hits the fan BIG TIME, and heads inevitably roll.
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.