If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #96
Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:37PM
Location: CI, Earth
Posts: 4062
Hmm. There was a case a while back of bad "dies-soldered-together" BJT power amp transistors, which worked at 1/2 their rated power and voltage, then failed catastrophically.
I can see the EU being very interested in this, as its a serious safety risk (bet the PSUs have not been CE tested)
-A
"Bother" said Pooh, as his secret moonbase was pwned by LCROSS...
Registered Member #152
Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 03:36PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 3384
Well thats pretty bad
brtaman wrote ...
Well I managed to destroy my ATX psu. A thermistor blew up while my sstc was in operation, blowing up my GDT!? and all IC's as well as the psu.
You used the PSU to power your gate driver? Did you happen to have the GDT wound with an enameled wire? I don't like making GDTs with enameled wire because you can have a small kink in the insulation and interwinding breakdown can occur. Also "standard" enameled wire is rated only at 50 volts. If this happened, your full DC buss voltage may have gone through your gate drivers into the PSU, blowing up everything on its way...
Registered Member #30
Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
well spotted brtaman!
I can think of a few possible reasons why they faked it:
1: to save money as others suggested 2: to make the PSU more efficient and cooler running (those passive PFC chokes get pretty hot) 3: they couldn't get the required inductance and current rating to actually make the choke do its job (see below) in a package that would fit inside the PSU, so they just said f*** it
Conundrum wrote ...
I can see the EU being very interested in this, as its a serious safety risk (bet the PSUs have not been CE tested)
I don't see a safety issue (if anything it's safer than a properly wound choke, because it runs cooler!) but it would probably fail testing for the CE mark. There are limits on harmonic currents for appliances over 75 watts, and that's what the choke is for, to keep the harmonic currents within CE limits! :P
PS: Is it me, or are all of the EMI filter components missing from the board too?!
Registered Member #2360
Joined: Sun Sept 13 2009, 05:43PM
Location: Kennesaw, Ga USA
Posts: 14
Hmm. that is lame. Mabey the old warning to not buy cars made on friday goes the same for chokes. The guy in charge of winding the wire was to busy chatting it up with his budy on the line about his weekend plans and let acouple of chokes slip buy. Or mabey they are cheap-skates. Most likely the later.!mistrust
Registered Member #162
Joined: Mon Feb 13 2006, 10:25AM
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3141
The purpose of the choke is to add weight to the product so that it 'feels' worth the money, and due to copper prices it's sufficient to just add steel. Similarly the 'feel-to-cost' ratio of line filters has now made them redundant. And don't get me started on those little smd electrolytics!
Just a note to anyone who thinks that the CE mark is proof of quality; Manufacturers self-certify their products, anyone can stick a CE mark on a product! Even then there is the CE mark which means 'China Export'! However, if you are killed by a CE marked device, you can sue the manufacturer. Caveat emptor applies !
As for EU rules on emc/emi/rfi/line noise, etc. ..... they're ridiculous - only a range of consumer items are covered, for the sake of expediency the worst offending items are exempt! e.g. plasma tv.
I guess I woke up in a cynical mindframe this morning !
Registered Member #311
Joined: Sun Mar 12 2006, 08:28PM
Location:
Posts: 253
On the subject of dodgy PSU fakery .... Fake Laptop PSU complete with lumps of metal to make it weigh the right amount
wrote ... As for EU rules on emc/emi/rfi/line noise, etc. ..... they're ridiculous - only a range of consumer items are covered, for the sake of expediency the worst offending items are exempt! e.g. plasma tv.
Not true - EMC applies to anything put on the market, although some product groups have different standards, these are often more onerous than the generic standards ( e.g. lighting).
I'm reminded of something a customer of mine told me a while ago - they needed some transformers with a particular country's safety approval mark. Their Chinese supplier replied "sure - no problem - just send us the artwork"!
Registered Member #2390
Joined: Sat Sept 26 2009, 02:04PM
Location: Milwaukee Wisconsin
Posts: 381
Here is something to think about! At my job we sometimes have to "UL" control panels per customer request. Once a year a "UL" inspector will come to the shop and do a complete inspection of a panel that will be "UL" labeled. Interestingly enough, when they do their inspection they look for these things! 1) All components are "UL" marked or uR (recognized) 2) Certain component combinations are "UL" tested. 3) All correct labeling ie : arc flash, cautions, warnings, torques, etc. are applied to the panel.
It seems odd that the inspectors don't really care about things like say, a direct phase to phase short of a 480v line. If this is the way "CE" operates, this is the reason for your fake choke! Simply there to make an appearance! I would agree the reason is based on money. Thats what all the big firms like "UL" "CE" "DVC" really care about. At 400 to 500 dollars for a "UL" sticker, what do they care if a product fails and takes out a whole family? I personally do not trust any components that are marked anymore than ones that are not.
Registered Member #30
Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
mikeselectricstuff wrote ...
Not true - EMC applies to anything put on the market, although some product groups have different standards, these are often more onerous than the generic standards ( e.g. lighting).
This is absolutely true. My work just recently sent me on a course run by the CE Marking Association, and it all is (or should be!) taken seriously. It is self-certification, in so far as the EU don't have inspectors that go round testing all new products. But the whole point of it is that if you place the CE mark on your product, and it's then found not to meet the CE standards, you are breaking the law and can be sued. And if you don't place the CE mark on it, you can't legally sell it in Europe.
CE is not a corporation like UL, the Underwriters' Laboratories. It's a European Union thing.
The product we developed just passed EMC testing to CE standards. I was in charge of digital, power supplies and PCB layout, and I even chose the wall wart, so if anyone could have screwed up the EMC it would have been me. I think we're throwing a test pass party this week
Registered Member #543
Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
The other massive racket that springs to mind, is the putting of size "C" NiMH cells in "D" cases , which is almost universal in Britain unless you go to a specialist supplier. Feel how light they are compared with a real "D" cell brimming with chemical goodness.*
This swindle has given folk the impression that NiMH batteriies don't last long, because most look to the enclosure size only, and not to the AH capacity. The rotters!
*I remember this phrase from a detergent advertisement some years ago. Times change.
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.