If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #1451
Joined: Wed Apr 23 2008, 03:48AM
Location: Boulder, Co
Posts: 661
rp181, ".2% efficiency is dead easy. With some tuning, you should be able to break 1%."
I think by .2 he means 20% as it is in normal number form. .2% is really .002 not just .2...
1.2x.2%=2.4J 1.2x.2=240J
I think you should use 10% as a model efficiency, still difficult to reach but doable without having to use special projectile materials and advanced pulse circuitry. It'll have to extremely well tuned and heavier projectiles would be better.
Registered Member #1513
Joined: Sat May 31 2008, 12:08PM
Location: Russia Klin
Posts: 48
wrote ... Do you think the guys at NASA just decided to slap together parts and build a space shuttle?
I think your coilgun is much simplier than Shuttle :) . I'm sure that you can figure it out in your mind, and no need in 3D modelling. Almost all guys who had made this coilguns haven't modelling them before building
wrote ... I think you should use 10% as a model efficiency
Why he should use 10%, if only 1 man in the whole world has reached this efficiency after a lot of studying and experiments? I think using 5% will be more fair
Registered Member #1062
Joined: Tue Oct 16 2007, 02:01AM
Location:
Posts: 1529
Who said only one man has reached that? I have reached 10%, and I know for a fact the person who used a iron powder shell has too. What is wrong with modeling it? There is no harm at all. Is, somethings will change, but its still better to have a idea.
Sorry about the .2 misunderstanding. Do you plan on portable of just a system?
Registered Member #1451
Joined: Wed Apr 23 2008, 03:48AM
Location: Boulder, Co
Posts: 661
Wasting money and time in failing time after time is worth the effort of modeling. Especially with a coilgun that is more complex than just a pen tube with some hookup wire wound around it. Plus, 3d modeling is plain fun! :)
Are you going to model the coil dimensions with something like Barry's calculator? That would help a lot with tuning and thus getting a great efficiency.
Registered Member #1062
Joined: Tue Oct 16 2007, 02:01AM
Location:
Posts: 1529
I never wrote up that coilgun, and it is disassembled now, as the railgun is priority. Modeling does help, but keep in mind the values change as the projectile moves. Take a look at FEMM, its actually quite easy once you take 1/2 hour to read the tutorial.
Registered Member #2099
Joined: Wed Apr 29 2009, 12:22AM
Location: Los Altos, California
Posts: 1716
kromsson wrote ... The energy of your capacitors is 1/2 x 6 x 2.000/1.000.000 x 450 x 450 = 1.215 J = 1.2kJ Assuming efficiency of 0.2 (which is VERY difficult already) you have 1.2 x 0.2 = 0.24 kJ of kinetic energy to the projectiles.
OK so far, but...
A projectile will have a volume of (converting inches to cm) : 1/2 x pi x 1.27 x 1.27 x 6.35 = 16 cm3 I assume you will use iron (induction coilgun) with a weight of about 8.000 kg/m3. This means your projectiles will weigh about 0.13 kg each.
BZZZZZT! Your factor of half s/b quarter, so it's 8 cm^3 and 64 grams.
E = 1/2 x m x u2 ===> u = 2 m/sec = 6 fps. For this matter you need greater capacitance, and a LOT smaller and lighter projectiles.
That would be the velocity for 130 kilograms! u = sqrt(2E/m) gives 61 m/s with the mass you stated, and 86 m/s with corrected value. The more conservative goal of 5% efficiency (muzzle energy 60 J) would yield 43 m/s. Launched vertically at that speed, a projectile without drag would climb 96 m (from E = mgh) and fly for more than 8 seconds. [edit]I have made pumpkins fly longer than that, with almost 2 kJ from bursting 2 liter soda bottles pressurized with CO2, but that is a story for another day.
When working this kind of problem in a spreadsheet calculator, I generally use separate text cells for variable names and their units of measurement. One way to avoid magnitude errors is to have all physics formulas and their I/O in columns that use basic SI units (kilograms, farads, cubic meters, pascals...) exclusively. A different column can have the I and O values in practical, intuitive units (inches, grams, microfarads, square millimeters ...). Merging unit conversions into physics formulas invites mistakes.
On the other hand, the auto loading of the magazine and the revolving and the cooling of the coils sound VERY interesting, good luck and I would be VERY interested to see the final project!
Registered Member #2360
Joined: Sun Sept 13 2009, 05:43PM
Location: Kennesaw, Ga USA
Posts: 14
with 2 pneumatic pistons
How about using solenoids instead for the pneumatic pistons. This way you won't have to run an air hose to the gun also. The gun sounds sweets though, good luck and post pictures.
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.