Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 46
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
No birthdays today

Next birthdays
05/07 a.gutzeit (64)
05/08 wpk5008 (35)
05/09 Alfons (37)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

how is a TVS different?

Move Thread LAN_403
Mates
Mon Sept 21 2009, 05:45AM
Mates Registered Member #1025 Joined: Sun Sept 23 2007, 07:53PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 566
Dr. Kilovolt wrote ...

Mates wrote ...

Dr. Kilovolt wrote ...

The MOSFET protect itself from overvoltage destruction by mechanism called avalanche breakdown. It can usually clamp the same current as it can switch, limited only by junction temperature.



I disagree Jan, most of today’s FET and IGBT transistors are indeed avalanche rated, but the energy they can handle in avalanche mode is much smaller than the switching energies in case the avalanche switch is repetitive. I have a huge collection of HV spikes destroyed FETs which all could have been saved in case I would use TVS. Avalanche mode is definitely unwanted situation for every transistor and using TVS is something I would always recommend even if the used transistors are avalanche rated.

Well... I have seen your line-powered single switch drivers... I guess then, they simply overheated by the huge amount of avalanche...
If you look at a few MOSFET datasheets, you'll usually see something along the lines that the maximum avalanche current is the same as maximum on-state current, and that the avalanche dissipation is limited only by maximum junction temperature allowed.

On the other hand, IGBTs are usually NOT avalanche rated.




OK, I don’t want to argue based on theory and datasheets. My arguments are based on my personal experience. I can suggest you a simple experiment which will cost you an avalanche rated FET, but you get an idea of what I’m talking about. Simply switch the primary of an ignition coil using some robust (16A 600V) avalanche rated FET/IGBT in series with the primary at 3 KHz. As a power source use the rectified mains with some kind of current limiter which will allow maximum of 4A. You will get destroyed transistor very quickly despite the transistor is cold, because of the HV spikes. In case you add a TVS it will protect the transistor, but it will get hot very quickly. Thus, according to my expensive experience avalanche rated transistors are not the same as transitors protected by the TVS in case of repetitive switching of inductive loads in higher frequency rate (above 1 KHz).

BTW: I don’t know how rare are the avalanche rated IGBT’s, but all the IGBT’s I ever had in my hands were always avalanche rated…

Cheers Mates
Back to top
Steve Conner
Mon Sept 21 2009, 07:26AM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
"Avalanche rated" doesn't mean anything on its own. The manufacturer must qualify it with the avalanche energy and power that the device can stand reliably. This can vary widely between devices.

For high voltage IGBTs, I'd expect it to be much less than the device's rated dissipation, maybe 10 watts or so. Some low-voltage MOSFETs are so good that you can tie the gate to the source and use them as 50 watt Zeners. smile

On the other hand, the power rating of a TVS is its avalanche rating.

Another important point that I don't think anyone made: A TVS clamps overvoltage. An ordinary diode only clamps reverse voltage. Those are two fundamentally different functions.
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.