Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 22
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Self Defenestrate (35)
Alex Yuan (29)


Next birthdays
04/05 Self Defenestrate (35)
04/05 Alex Yuan (29)
04/06 Jrz126 (41)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Sale and Trade
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

looking for someone that can machine copper pieces

Move Thread LAN_403
rp181
Thu Jul 30 2009, 09:34AM Print
rp181 Registered Member #1062 Joined: Tue Oct 16 2007, 02:01AM
Location:
Posts: 1529
I have some .19" x 1.5"x12"pieces of copper that need to be milled to a .125" thickness, and then a 1.5" long section 1.625" from the edge milled down another .0625".
So the end product is a 12" long, 1.5" wide piece. Thickness is as follows:
8.875" of .125" thick
1.5" of .0625" thick
1.625" of .125" thick.

After that, The copper needs to be cut in half length wise, I can do that if you can't.
Back to top
Proud Mary
Thu Jul 30 2009, 10:04AM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
I'm not too sure I understand the composite decimal-fractional notation, but that aside, you could easily grind these copper pieces down to the right size with abrasives if there are not too many of them, and it is important enough.
Back to top
rp181
Thu Jul 30 2009, 10:41AM
rp181 Registered Member #1062 Joined: Tue Oct 16 2007, 02:01AM
Location:
Posts: 1529
I changed it to all decimal =)
It is very difficult to sand something that thin. The copper gets hot very fast, and the end result is always bad. If worst comes to worst, I will modify the garolite enclosure. I don't want to do that, as I would have to use a table saw, with coarse teeth, and delamination could easily occur.
Back to top
klugesmith
Thu Jul 30 2009, 10:07PM
klugesmith Registered Member #2099 Joined: Wed Apr 29 2009, 12:22AM
Location: Los Altos, California
Posts: 1716
Sorry, got no milling service. And yes, Cu is hard to grind (and not easy to machine). Ever consider heavy duty etching? smile

Since your finished thicknesses are all multiples of 1/16 inch,
can you just build up your part from 2 layers of .0625 flat stock?
Or 16 gauge (48 ounce) sheet (thk. approx .0647 )
Back to top
rp181
Fri Jul 31 2009, 02:40AM
rp181 Registered Member #1062 Joined: Tue Oct 16 2007, 02:01AM
Location:
Posts: 1529
Would the etching work? It seems it would just etch down, and start etching on the sides, and below the masked part.
Back to top
...
Fri Jul 31 2009, 04:50AM
... Registered Member #56 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:02AM
Location: Southern Califorina, USA
Posts: 2445
If you aren't in a hurry I could do it at school, but it will be 2-3 months before I could get back to you. \

It seems like with the amount of work you do it might be worth it to invest in a cheep mill--you can get a small one from harbor freight for a few hundred bucks that would be able to do the job. You could even get away with a drill press and linear slide vice (something like Link2 if you only need to do simple stuff.
Back to top
rp181
Fri Jul 31 2009, 12:33PM
rp181 Registered Member #1062 Joined: Tue Oct 16 2007, 02:01AM
Location:
Posts: 1529
I don't do very much work involving mills. My school has a nice mill, but no attachments. Its a new school, so woodworking took priority.

Buying the required bits would cost more than replacing the copper.

2 months is too long, I get a high spped camera in a month. If all else fails, I will try sanding...
Back to top
Herr Zapp
Fri Jul 31 2009, 01:16PM
Herr Zapp Registered Member #480 Joined: Thu Jul 06 2006, 07:08PM
Location: North America
Posts: 644
rp181 -

The first thing I'd ask is why your design would require stepped thickness in your buss bar? This just isn't good practice, and greatly complicates fabrication of the part. What can you change to eliminate the need for stepped thickness? If its a problem with clearance, can you form a offset in the part (a slightly raised bridge, etc) or shim something else to create the required clearance?

If your design is "locked in" and absolutely required stepped thickness, then here are some options:

I know you have already purchased some .19" thick material, but unfortunately what you've got can't be "easily" converted into what you want. From a machining standpoint, annealed copper is very soft and "gummy", and not easy to machine with cutting tools (eg by milling) or by abrasives. A file or belt sander can eventually remove material, but its a real PITA if much material must be removed. Especially difficult is the relative thinness of your material; holding thin, soft stock for any type of "machining" is quite difficult without making some special holding fixture.

If you need .125 thickness for most of your part, then start with .125 thick copper stock (a standard thickness) to minimize the amount of material removal required. If I understand your dimensioning, then there is only a small area that needs to be reduced in thickness to .062".

Another approach would be an additive process, where you use two layers of .062" stock soldered together where you need the .125" thickness. This way there is no need to remove any material at all. Copper is very easy to sweat-solder together if the pieces are flat and clean, and electrically this would be essentially equivalent to a single piece of .125 material.

You didn't specify what type of Garolite material you are using (linen reinforced phenolic? fiberglass reinforced epoxy?), but I wouldn't worry about delamination, regardless of how many teeth are on your saw blade. The phenolic-base Garolite cuts cleanly with a sharp carbide-tipped blade. The fiberglass-epoxy material is hell on any cutting tool, and will quickly dull even carbide tipped tools, as well as generating "sawdust" containing microscopic glass fibers that are very irritating to eyes and skin.

Regards,
Herr Zapp

Back to top
rp181
Fri Jul 31 2009, 02:56PM
rp181 Registered Member #1062 Joined: Tue Oct 16 2007, 02:01AM
Location:
Posts: 1529
It is G-11, a epoxy glass garolite. These are for railgun rails, so the lowest part is for the insulator. The short .125" is bent 90 degrees, to exit the enclosure.

Thanks for the advice, I will just widen the grooves.
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.