Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 30
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Sync (33)
Grant-ZA (58)
FreakyG (56)
brtaman (38)


Next birthdays
04/22 Sync (33)
04/22 Grant-ZA (58)
04/22 FreakyG (56)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Tesla Coils
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Steve Ward's drsstc interrupter. Pulse width control problems.

1 2 
Move Thread LAN_403
Arcstarter
Wed Jul 15 2009, 07:02AM Print
Arcstarter Registered Member #1225 Joined: Sat Jan 12 2008, 01:24AM
Location: Beaumont, Texas, USA
Posts: 2253
Hello all, i recently decided to construct a drsstc. I decided upon Steve Ward's interrupter on the solid state page, under drsstc's: Link2

I like it because of the burst mode and pulse width control. I could not get the darn burst mode circuit to work (it seems it is always that particular schematic that gives me a hard time) so i made my own, on a .75 by 1.25 inch PC board. It works well, though instead of a 50k pot (which i have ATM) i would prefer a 40k resistor in series with a 10k pot, i will change that.

Well, the pulse width control is not working. My freq meter claims the duty cycle is 99.8%, but i disagree. It is quieter than the output of the BPS control using a speaker, so i am thinking it is lower duty cycle than the BPS control. The output of the BPS control 555 is around 60-70% and variable from 100-700 hertz, which i am fairly satisfied with at this moment. I might use a 100k or so pot for lower BPS if i ever feel the need.

If i adjust the pulse width controllers pot, nothing changes. The duty cycle says the same thing, it sounds the same, and nothing heats more or anything. I have looked at my circuit, and for the life of me i cannot find an error. It is a very simple schematic, too. I have checked the pot, changed the 555 some 10 times (heh, ya never know, right?). It has a decoupling capacitor, for the record. The diode is a fast diode, just in case. It is rated for 1.5 amps and something like 100-200ns and 600 volts.

Thanks for any replies in advance cheesey.
Back to top
Bennem
Wed Jul 15 2009, 08:08AM
Bennem Registered Member #154 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 04:28PM
Location: Westmidlands, UK
Posts: 260
Hi Arcstarter,

I really think you need to scope the signals,
as the pulse width part is visible by zooming into the scope shot.

Mel
Back to top
StevenCaton
Wed Jul 15 2009, 05:53PM
StevenCaton Registered Member #1845 Joined: Fri Dec 05 2008, 05:38AM
Location: California
Posts: 211
You could always just build Dan's Interruptor for DRSSTC's. Link2
Just built the part where it says PW adjust and PRF adjust. You've got some connections to + 9 volts, some connections to a ground, and pin 3 (labeled out) is of course the output. It doesn't get any simpler. This circuit, is of course, specifically built for drsstc's. It gives like 30Hz to 300Hz, and I forgot the pulsewidths, but give it a try.

Someone else on a thread a long time ago said they built Steve's interruptor and they were having problems with it for whatever reason, so you might want to just build Dan's circuit.
Back to top
Arcstarter
Wed Jul 15 2009, 06:26PM
Arcstarter Registered Member #1225 Joined: Sat Jan 12 2008, 01:24AM
Location: Beaumont, Texas, USA
Posts: 2253
Bennem wrote ...

Hi Arcstarter,

I really think you need to scope the signals,
as the pulse width part is visible by zooming into the scope shot.

Mel
That is what i was thinking, but my duty cycle meter claims 99.8%. Perhaps the duty cycle was too low? The meter is made for 20-80% but i have used down to 9%. I should have a scope soon, so i will scope it when i get the money for a probe.

Also I'd think you would hear the difference in duty cycle.

Something to note is when i turn the pot it sometime will change the sound just a bit. IT sounds like the potentiometer is bad, but i changed it out with another one that works perfectly and it did the same thing, at the same resistance.
Back to top
teravolt
Wed Jul 15 2009, 09:21PM
teravolt Registered Member #195 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 08:27PM
Location: Berkeley, ca.
Posts: 1111
I built the circuit and it works. I changed the output stage with the fets using a hi side and lo side driver.you have to have a scope to trubleshoot it
Back to top
Arcstarter
Thu Jul 16 2009, 03:40AM
Arcstarter Registered Member #1225 Joined: Sat Jan 12 2008, 01:24AM
Location: Beaumont, Texas, USA
Posts: 2253
teravolt wrote ...

I built the circuit and it works. I changed the output stage with the fets using a hi side and lo side driver.you have to have a scope to trubleshoot it
Hrmm, have you ever hooked it up to a speaker? If so, did it sound different when you change the pulse width? Apparently that is my only way to tell at this moment, because my duty cycle meter still insists it is 99.8% :P.
Back to top
teravolt
Thu Jul 16 2009, 07:33PM
teravolt Registered Member #195 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 08:27PM
Location: Berkeley, ca.
Posts: 1111
oops sorry I was wrong and was refeing to Sreve Wards universal driver witch seems to work. that circuit at the top of yuor page should work with no problem if you have a logic probe you can get to oscillate no problem but you will still need a scope to set the pulse duration
Back to top
Arcstarter
Thu Jul 23 2009, 02:25AM
Arcstarter Registered Member #1225 Joined: Sat Jan 12 2008, 01:24AM
Location: Beaumont, Texas, USA
Posts: 2253
Well, i finally received my scope today (Thank you Phillip!) and i scoped the interrupter.

The first picture is the output from the pulse width controller. As you can see, my multimeter was clearly correct about ~99.7% duty cycle. I am not sure why it does this confused Note the potentiometer did not change anything.

The second shot is the output of the BPS control oscillator. A nice clean ~50% square wave.
1248315920 1225 FT72947 Interrupter Scope Shot1 001

1248315920 1225 FT72947 Interrupter Scope Shot1 002
Back to top
StevenCaton
Thu Jul 23 2009, 04:12AM
StevenCaton Registered Member #1845 Joined: Fri Dec 05 2008, 05:38AM
Location: California
Posts: 211
How funny, I was just about to ask you whether or not you got Steve's interruptor to work.

EDIT: But wait, 50% duty cycle!! What??
Back to top
hvguy
Thu Jul 23 2009, 06:01AM
hvguy Registered Member #289 Joined: Mon Mar 06 2006, 10:45AM
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 154
Second waveform looks great, the first looks like the timer does not have a capacitor connected to it. This would also be collaborated by the fact that the pot does nothing. Check your wiring...

Congrats on the scope, they are sooo useful with these things.
Back to top
1 2 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.