Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 30
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
No birthdays today

Next birthdays
05/27 Daniel Davis (54)
05/29 Zonalklism (34)
05/29 Dr Hankenstein (68)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Projects
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Multiple Waveform Function Generator on an ARM7

Move Thread LAN_403
GeordieBoy
Wed Jul 01 2009, 05:27PM
GeordieBoy Registered Member #1232 Joined: Wed Jan 16 2008, 10:53PM
Location: Doon tha Toon!
Posts: 881
Most of the commercial DDS function generator products from Agilent (HP) work pretty much as you described. The only difference is that they wrap up all the logic in a high-speed FPGA and communicate with that from a microcontroller that runs the display and GPIB interface etc.

"Fast" is definitely the order of the day, with modern DDS clocking speeds being in the high hundreds of MHz. At these speeds dedicated hardware or FPGA beats software hands down. But the software solution running on a low cost microcontroller or DSP is great for low frequency applications, particularly audio.

-Richie,
Back to top
Bjørn
Wed Jul 01 2009, 07:02PM
Bjørn Registered Member #27 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 02:20AM
Location: Hyperborea
Posts: 2058
There are many useful functions that can be added with relatively few lines of code. Voltmeter, 500 kHz oscilloscope, 30 MHz frequency counters, frequency and pulse generators, RS-232 decoders and most likely a few thousand other features.

It is even possible to do VGA resolution video and Ethernet in software using such a microcontroller and some very clever coding.
Back to top
GeordieBoy
Thu Jul 02 2009, 09:22PM
GeordieBoy Registered Member #1232 Joined: Wed Jan 16 2008, 10:53PM
Location: Doon tha Toon!
Posts: 881
BTW, Mike, regarding the squarewave output, the best way to do this is to pass the filtered sinewave through a fast comparator.

If you just take the MSB of the DAC output or use a lookup table for the squarewave it will suffer from horrendous phase-jitter at high frequencies. Lowpass filtering the sinewave removes this phase-jitter due to images of the sampling process. The comparator that follows can then produce a nice clean jitter free squarewave fit for whatever purpose you choose.

As an educational excercise it is interesting to compare the square waveform generated this proper way with that generated by taking the MSB of the DAC data. As you increase the output frequency towards the limit you will see that one remains clean and jitter free, and the other has 1 sample of jitter on the rising and falling edges.

-Richie,
Back to top
Mike
Fri Jul 03 2009, 06:01AM
Mike Registered Member #58 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:40AM
Location: Tri-Cities, Washington, US
Posts: 317
GeordieBoy wrote ...

BTW, Mike, regarding the squarewave output, the best way to do this is to pass the filtered sinewave through a fast comparator.

If you just take the MSB of the DAC output or use a lookup table for the squarewave it will suffer from horrendous phase-jitter at high frequencies. Lowpass filtering the sinewave removes this phase-jitter due to images of the sampling process. The comparator that follows can then produce a nice clean jitter free squarewave fit for whatever purpose you choose.

As an educational excercise it is interesting to compare the square waveform generated this proper way with that generated by taking the MSB of the DAC data. As you increase the output frequency towards the limit you will see that one remains clean and jitter free, and the other has 1 sample of jitter on the rising and falling edges.

-Richie,

Ah, yes that would be a good idea for sure. I think Bjorn mentioned this to me before but I forgot about it. I will probably implement this later on and do as you suggest of looking at the comparator output against the MSB.

Now the only other thing I am thinking about with the function generator is a way to vary the duty cycle, I will have to research a bit to see how difficult it is to accomplish this in the method my generator is currently setup.
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.