Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 81
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Barry (70)
Snowcat (37)
wylie (43)


Next birthdays
02/03 Bauerb2 (35)
02/04 Fabio (45)
02/04 Corey (34)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Tesla Coils
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

GDT pulse times in SSTCs...

Move Thread LAN_403
Nicko
Thu May 14 2009, 12:06PM Print
Nicko Registered Member #1334 Joined: Tue Feb 19 2008, 04:37PM
Location: Nr. London, UK
Posts: 615
SSTCs can run between, lets say, 100kHz and 400kHz approx.

That's between 2.5 & 10uS per cycle.

For a smallish SSTC/DRSSTC, what would a good "on" time be for the gate drivers? For a smallish FET like the IRFP450 driven from a GDT with plenty of primary "umph", what do you think the smallest pulse width you would be safe with would be.,.. At lower frequencies, would a longer on-time be advisable?

Just a thought...
Back to top
GeordieBoy
Thu May 14 2009, 01:37PM
GeordieBoy Registered Member #1232 Joined: Wed Jan 16 2008, 10:53PM
Location: Doon tha Toon!
Posts: 881
The "allowable" pulse width depends on many things:

1. GDT bandwidth
2. Gate capacitance
3. Operating frequency
4. Power dissipation in the MOSFET die
5. Desired spark appearance

etc, etc...

You need to be more specific. For a CW SSTC the on time for each MOSFET is usually just less than 50% of the total period. That way each MOSFET is on for just less than half the time and there is some deadtime in between.

-Richie,
Back to top
Nicko
Thu May 14 2009, 01:59PM
Nicko Registered Member #1334 Joined: Tue Feb 19 2008, 04:37PM
Location: Nr. London, UK
Posts: 615
I'm using either a FERROXCUBE TN23/14/7-3E25 or p/n 5978006401 (type 78). These are wound with 10 turns CAT5 or similar - I haven't got the complete circuits to hand for on-line use, but its not rocket-science - great care has been taken to minimise impedance & stray capacitance in the bridge layout. Drivers are UCC3732xP.

I specified the operating frequencies & FETs above - Qg is typically 75nC from the datasheet with a max of 90nC.

Sparks? Yes please. Bigger, more varied, the better. I like both CW & pulsed!

I realise how bridges work, the reason for the original question is to tap people's practical experience as I'm introducing dead-time into the driver, and there are a raft of ways of doing that, one of the simplist being to use a monostable. If I do that and the period is fixed, a handle on the range to use would be good.

Cheers
Back to top
GeordieBoy
Thu May 14 2009, 05:04PM
GeordieBoy Registered Member #1232 Joined: Wed Jan 16 2008, 10:53PM
Location: Doon tha Toon!
Posts: 881
Okay. You only need to introduce enough dead-time to prevent overlap of the MOSFET's conduction times. This is essential to prevent shoot-through - A potential cause of excessive ringing and MOSFET deaths.

Increasing the deadtime further reduces output power by allowing the resonant load current to free-wheel in the fast-recovery diodes instead of being powered from the DC bus. It is also worth bearing in mind that the longer the longer the current is conducted by the free-wheel diodes during the deadtime, the higher the resulting dissipation will be in these diodes.

Typically 200ns will be sufficient deadtime for MOSFETs switching around 200kHz. At higher frequencies deadtime can be reduced with great attention paid to symmetrical drive, or a single-ended arrangement can be used to rule out cross-conduction. Conversely some large IGBT's have a long current-tail event at the end of their turn-off phase and may easily require 1us or more of deadtime.

If you are experimenting with this stuff I would build in a means to increase the deadtime up to say 20% of the total period. That way you can easily see the effect on an oscilloscope and check it is working correctly. It will also allow you to do some research yourself into what actually happens in an H-bridge dring a TC during the deadtime. You might actually be surprised how complex the behaviour can be!

-Richie,
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.