If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #152
Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 03:36PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 3384
Sulaiman wrote ...
Is each cell a blue led with a phosphor like the 5mm eBay China ones? or is it something else?
You can only get white light from LEDs by using phospors (99% of white LEDs) or by using RGB LEDs. So I'm pretty sure this one uses blue LEDs with phospors.
Registered Member #191
Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 02:01AM
Location: Esbjerg Denmark
Posts: 720
yes, the yellow stuff is the phosphor, but these chips are a lot bigger than the ones in normal 5mm leds, these are more like chips you would find in a 3W luxeon or something.
Registered Member #10
Joined: Thu Feb 02 2006, 09:45AM
Location: Bunbury, Australia
Posts: 1424
This is a 100W LEd made from a 100 x 1W LED's. Output is 7000 lumens. Since 1W = 683 Lumens for 100% efficiency then this LED is about 10% efficient. ie produces 90W of heat. Typically 34V at 3.2 A. Obtained from eBay store here.
This is a pic of my shed lit with one plus a 150W incandescent globe for comparison.
Registered Member #152
Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 03:36PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 3384
Talk about stupidly bright
The luminous efficacy is 70lm/W but this does not say anything about how much power it converts to light. This is because luminous efficacy is weighted according to the photopic sensitivity of the eye, which is the highest at green light and falls to the blues and reds.
Even if the LED did radiate ALL of its power in the reds, its luminous efficacy would NOT be 683lm/W. (at least thats how I understand it).
So the power-to-visible-light (400-700nm) conversion efficiency of your LED is probably quite higher, so it radiates less heat. Also some of the spectrum might be radiated in the near-infrared, which I don't know if can be classified as "heat".
Registered Member #347
Joined: Sat Mar 25 2006, 08:26AM
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 106
For white light, approximately 250lm/W is 100% efficiency, but that may change depending on the spectral content of the light. So your LED may be about 28% efficient. Still nowhere near that of the light source it replaces, high pressure sodium lamps are about ~100-160lm/W depending on wattage, higher wattage being more efficient.
I also read somewhere that low pressure sodium lamps are up to 80% efficient, but they're not used much because they produce one wavelength of orange light only, and nothing else. As an example of their efficiency, they need to be run inside an evacuated glass "thermos" to keep them warm enough during operation.
Registered Member #30
Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
Nice LED, Peter! Looks like it sparked the old debate on how efficient white LEDs really are.
For a start, they are handicapped by having to be white. This wastes power in wavelengths that the eye isn't particularly sensitive to.
One important reason why those low-pressure sodium lamps are so efficient (or efficaceous, rather) is that they emit all their power at one wavelength near the peak sensitivity of the eye. So they score highly on lumens/watt, the downside being that everything looks either yellow or black.
We used them extensively for streetlighting over here, up until a few years ago when the city council mysteriously changed to HPS and metal halide. I have one of the old 90W LPS streetlamp tops that I found by the roadside, and yes, the bulb has a kind of thermos-like outer, and switching it on in the living room is pretty unpleasant.
Registered Member #10
Joined: Thu Feb 02 2006, 09:45AM
Location: Bunbury, Australia
Posts: 1424
I was falling asleep last night when I did the last post so didn't include the info about luminous efficacy or some of the pros and cons re street lighting. Many US cities including LA and NY are doing feasability studies on replacing their 100,000 plus streetlights. Low pressure sodium is unpleasant because of the monochromatic yellow but very efficient. High pressure sodium is more white but less efficient. LED's are about as efficient but have lower maintainence. There are other advantages in smaller packaging and better beam direction to reduce wastage. For example there are different beams for a street than an intersection or junction. All this does stack the data in favour of the LED. Cost being the main difference. A range of streetlights is here up to arrays of 200W. I did get to use it at Earth Hour and briefly turn most of the other lights off. I built it up into PVC tubing with a rectangular connection that just nicely fitted the heatsink/fan. I was making the shaft to accomodate 3 SLA 12 batteries. Then I thought it might look interesting as a mechanical arm attachment vaguely reminiscent of Iron man or one of the Transformers (robots).
Registered Member #1497
Joined: Thu May 22 2008, 05:24AM
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 801
Is it time for the obligatory 'I'm charging my laser'?
Regardless, for $300US, was it really worth it for 100W? At $3/W, I suppose its par for the course for 1W luxeon stars, (although 3W's seem to be a little better for $/W ratio). Not too sure about the newer Rebel stars, etc, but for the convenience of the package, I suppose it was worth it...
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.