Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 83
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Barry (70)
Snowcat (37)
wylie (43)


Next birthdays
02/03 Bauerb2 (35)
02/04 Fabio (45)
02/04 Corey (34)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Tesla Coils
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

VTTC question

Move Thread LAN_403
Dr. Dark Current
Sat Mar 07 2009, 05:39PM Print
Dr. Dark Current Registered Member #152 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 03:36PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 3384
The question is concerning the primary capacitor, "we" (me and my friends) can't come to a conclusion.

Is the primary LC calculated so that it resonates at the same f0 as the secondary, or
does it resonate higher?

I think that when the tube is conducting, it "brakes" the LC so in result the oscillator frequency is lower than the resonance of the primary LC alone. So the capacitor should be of lower capacitance than resonant.
Is this true?

Here is a drawing illustrating my idea, first waveform is the oscillation of the primary LC alone, second is "switched" with a vacuum tube as in VTTC: Link2

I also think that the capacitor should not alter the running frequency much, since the running frequency is mainly derived from the secondary resonance. Is this how does it work?

I am no expert on VTTCs and I have never built one so please correct me if I'm wrong.



Any help is appreciated smile


Edit: My point is that like this the efficiency will be highest, of course it will work when the primary LC is tuned exactly to the secondary resonance, but I think the efficiency will suffer this way...

Back to top
Mads Barnkob
Sat Mar 07 2009, 06:23PM
Mads Barnkob Registered Member #1403 Joined: Tue Mar 18 2008, 06:05PM
Location: Denmark, Odense C
Posts: 1968
I think it is more important that your capacitor matches the load impedance of your tube, tuning can be done on the primary, the capacitor is a vital part of deciding your Q of the system.

I can only advice you to read steve wards math section in the bottom here: Link2
Back to top
Proud Mary
Sat Mar 07 2009, 06:36PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
The popular VTTC designs are nearly always Armstrong Oscillators

Wikipedia:

Link2

In the Armstrong Oscillator VTTC, the valve anode (US: tube plate) inductance also serves as the primary of the Tesla transformer. The feedback winding (US: 'tickler') couples a tiny amount of the RF energy in the resonant transformer back to the grid 180 deg out of phase, so oscillation is maintained.

Study the fundamentals of the Armstrong Oscillator - the simplest type of valve oscillator there is - and the whole VTTC action will become clear to you. smile
Back to top
Dr. Dark Current
Sat Mar 07 2009, 06:50PM
Dr. Dark Current Registered Member #152 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 03:36PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 3384
I have read the article, but I'm still not very clever from that, so I'll try to ask,

1) Does changing the capacitor change the running frequency accordingly? Or is the running frequency mainly dependent on feedback from the secondary so it stays fairly close to sec. resonance no matter of the primary cap?

2) (kinda related) Is the running frequency of a properly designed VTTC close to the primary LC self-resonance, or is the LC tuned higher?

Back to top
Proud Mary
Sat Mar 07 2009, 08:13PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
For optimum performance, the self-resonant frequency of the Tesla resonator secondary should be the same as the frequency determined (chiefly) by L and C in the Armstrong Oscillator.

In a real world oscillator, sufficient feedback from the 'tickler' coil is likely to 'pull' the circuit, so that it oscillates (perhaps erratically) despite optimum conditions not having been met.

A veteran lazy bones, I'd wind my secondary, determine its self-resonant frequency by sticking it into a quick and dirty oscillator - a P-JFET/N-JFET Lamda negative resistance oscillator, or one leg of an emitter coupled oscillator, for example. Once you have determined fo for your coil, it is a piece of cake to work out L and C for the Armstrong Oscillator, perhaps with a variable capacitor to really tweak it up to precision.

Back to top
vasil
Sat Mar 07 2009, 08:53PM
vasil Registered Member #229 Joined: Tue Feb 21 2006, 07:33PM
Location: Romania
Posts: 506
I tune my VTTCs a bit lower to compensate the streamer capacitance.
Back to top
Tonskulus
Sun Mar 08 2009, 01:16AM
Tonskulus Registered Member #1223 Joined: Thu Jan 10 2008, 04:32PM
Location:
Posts: 133
Primary resonant freq is determined by primary tank circuit component valuses (L and C). Feedback circuit has no effect for this, it is only kind of load for tank circuit (adds some phase shift for tank current and voltage as any load will do).

Primary circuit has to be tuned to same freq as secondary resonant freq. Just like radio receiver works, it is tuned to same freq as transmitter station is.
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.