Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 54
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Barry (70)
Snowcat (37)
wylie (43)


Next birthdays
02/01 Barry (70)
02/01 Snowcat (37)
02/01 wylie (43)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Tesla Coils
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

primary coil's effect on spark length

Move Thread LAN_403
StevenCaton
Sun Jan 04 2009, 02:11AM Print
StevenCaton Registered Member #1845 Joined: Fri Dec 05 2008, 05:38AM
Location: California
Posts: 211
I have a question about the effectiveness of making a primary coil more conical, in order to get higher coupling.
Let us assume that there is a spark gap coil that makes 40 inch sparks with a flat spiral coil.
What kind of spark length increase can one expect to achieve if the primary is changed to a 45 degree conical coil.


Does making the primary coil more conical really offer very much of an increase in spark length with a spark gap coil? (or only minimal,,, say 1 or 2 inches, from the original 40)
Anyone done experiments on this?
Back to top
NickCesar
Sun Jan 04 2009, 02:43AM
NickCesar Registered Member #1799 Joined: Thu Nov 06 2008, 02:20AM
Location:
Posts: 23
It simply increases coupling. It will only increase spark length if you cannot achieve proper/high enough coupling with a flat primary.

However, it does require more wire/tube to achieve the same inductance and this can be viewed as a small inefficiency in terms of ohmic resistance. Of course the real issue is primary/toroid insulation/distance.
Back to top
StevenCaton
Sun Jan 04 2009, 04:31AM
StevenCaton Registered Member #1845 Joined: Fri Dec 05 2008, 05:38AM
Location: California
Posts: 211
It will only increase spark length if you cannot achieve proper/high enough coupling with a flat primary.

This brings up another point that I was curious about. I used to think that "the higher the coupling,,, the better" But now I understand that this is not neccesarily the case. I saw a coil on a website where the secondary was raised, and this led to a spark length increase. Since raising a secondary lowers coupling(I'm 95% sure that is correct), and the spark length grew, this shows that higher coupling is not always better.

I'll have to look at richies burnetts site,,,, I believe he had information about varying the coupling, and how it affects the system. If I remeber correctly, all an increase in coupling does is allow the energy transfer to occur faster. It doesn't neccesarily mean that MORE energy will be transferred into the secondary.
Back to top
MOT_man
Sun Jan 04 2009, 06:03AM
MOT_man Registered Member #1127 Joined: Mon Nov 19 2007, 12:08AM
Location:
Posts: 139
I've always used a flat coil primary. Never seen a need for a conical primary ever other than for looks....

Back to top
NickCesar
Sun Jan 04 2009, 07:52AM
NickCesar Registered Member #1799 Joined: Thu Nov 06 2008, 02:20AM
Location:
Posts: 23
SteveC wrote ...

It will only increase spark length if you cannot achieve proper/high enough coupling with a flat primary.

This brings up another point that I was curious about. I used to think that "the higher the coupling,,, the better" But now I understand that this is not neccesarily the case. I saw a coil on a website where the secondary was raised, and this led to a spark length increase. Since raising a secondary lowers coupling(I'm 95% sure that is correct), and the spark length grew, this shows that higher coupling is not always better.

I'll have to look at richies burnetts site,,,, I believe he had information about varying the coupling, and how it affects the system. If I remeber correctly, all an increase in coupling does is allow the energy transfer to occur faster. It doesn't neccesarily mean that MORE energy will be transferred into the secondary.

Correct, I was not implying a higher coupling is always better. Simply that you'd only use a conical primary to increase coupling if you're coupling was not high enough (aka too low).

The time it takes for the energy transfer to complete does dictate how much is transferred because the sparkgap is a time-related loss. Heating loss due to resistance is (I^2)R=W=J/s (energy per second). Having a higher coupling can make it harder for the sparkgap to cease conducting though. So although energy transfer occurs quicker it transfers back and further multiple times and the total time it spends in the primary is greater.
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.