If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #1321
Joined: Sat Feb 16 2008, 03:22AM
Location:
Posts: 843
Hello PanosB,
I think the field enhancement in this case is more due to a "void" (where the air has a lower permitivity than the adjacent dielectric) than a "triple point" per se.
Registered Member #205
Joined: Sat Feb 18 2006, 11:59AM
Location: Skørping, Denmark
Posts: 741
The standard way to avoid high voltages between layers, is sectioning the winding into a stack of pie shaped windings. Each layer thus has only a few windings. This is standard practice in high voltage distribution transformers, flybacks. Cut a flyback in 2 and see for yourself. Also see this one, which still needs to pass the test.
Registered Member #1321
Joined: Sat Feb 16 2008, 03:22AM
Location:
Posts: 843
Actually I don't consider 1 to 2 kv between layers to be all that "high"; the problem is that I was trying to avoid putting it in oil or impregnating it with silicone, epoxy, etc., yet still avoid corona. That idea now seems less feasible, and I suppose my next step will be to try to find a coil winding shop that can make a custom coil at a reasonable price.
Registered Member #1262
Joined: Fri Jan 25 2008, 05:22AM
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 451
What about bunching the turns up several layers thick without ever reversing the winding direction? Sort of how youd wind a TC secondary, except with the turns bunched up a few layers at a time. You would sacrifice a lot of space with this winding arrangment though.
Registered Member #205
Joined: Sat Feb 18 2006, 11:59AM
Location: Skørping, Denmark
Posts: 741
jpsmith123 wrote ...
Actually I don't consider 1 to 2 kv between layers to be all that "high";
But you should! The problems that you are facing are due to just that. And you may very well find that the transformer shop, if you find one, will routinely wind it that way.
Registered Member #152
Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 03:36PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 3384
Finn Hammer wrote ...
The standard way to avoid high voltages between layers, is sectioning the winding into a stack of pie shaped windings. Each layer thus has only a few windings. This is standard practice in high voltage distribution transformers, flybacks. Cut a flyback in 2 and see for yourself.
This can be done only in diode-split transformers or lower voltage ones. The diodes greatly reduce the AC component on the highest potential sections, so the last-section-to-core insulation can be quite thin as it has to insulate mostly DC.
However if you were to use the same winding tecnique in a non diode-split transformer of significant voltage output, the insulation between last section and core would see full AC voltage which means big corona and dielectric losses.
I believe most of you have seen the failure of rectifiers in a diode-split flyback, where it literally lights up with corona and dies/bursts in flames a second later.
Registered Member #205
Joined: Sat Feb 18 2006, 11:59AM
Location: Skørping, Denmark
Posts: 741
Dr. Kilovolt wrote ...
This can be done only in diode-split transformers or lower voltage ones. The diodes greatly reduce the AC component on the highest potential sections, so the last-section-to-core insulation can be quite thin as it has to insulate mostly DC.
Yes, but it also introduces DC to the windings, which means that you have to have an airgap in the core to handle the static flux. This works in a flyback with a few mA, but I doubt it will be any good in a power transformer.
Dr. Kilovolt wrote ...
However if you were to use the same winding tecnique in a non diode-split transformer of significant voltage output, the insulation between last section and core would see full AC voltage which means big corona and dielectric losses.
Big corona only if the distance to the core is too small. Again, in tv flybacks where every mm counts, due to price, this may matter, but it does not in a custom hobby transformer.
Dr. Kilovolt wrote ...
I believe most of you have seen the failure of rectifiers in a diode-split flyback, where it literally lights up with corona and dies/bursts in flames a second later.
Failure of the rectifier due to pulling more current than the device is rated for?
Registered Member #1321
Joined: Sat Feb 16 2008, 03:22AM
Location:
Posts: 843
"But you should! The problems that you are facing are due to just that."
Well in a purely tautological sense, yes. Practically speaking, it's only "high" because I don't have the means readily available to encapsulate it, and I want to eliminate the possibility of corona.
If I could take the bobbin I have and somehow add one dividing flange in the middle, or machine something similar from scratch, my problem would be solved, but I can't, as I don't have access to a machine shop.
"And you may very well find that the transformer shop, if you find one, will routinely wind it that way."
Probably not since if they are going to encapsulate, a straight layer winding would suffice and would probably be easier to make. But even if they do, it wouldn't matter to me since I'd be buying at a fixed price to my specifications, and I don't care how they choose to do it.
Registered Member #152
Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 03:36PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 3384
Finn Hammer wrote ...
Yes, but it also introduces DC to the windings, which means that you have to have an airgap in the core to handle the static flux. This works in a flyback with a few mA, but I doubt it will be any good in a power transformer.
Well, I have driven rectified flybacks to a few hundred watts, they heat up a lot but this is more likely because of big resistance of the secondary windings. I'm not sure but it's possible that halfwave rectification on the output halves the core's power handling capability though.
Finn Hammer wrote ...
Failure of the rectifier due to pulling more current than the device is rated for?
Probably, I don't remember the exact conditions, maybe it was combined with overvoltage (one diode dies by overcurrent > others see more voltage > they die by overvoltage)
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.