Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 132
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
a.gutzeit (64)


Next birthdays
05/08 wpk5008 (35)
05/09 Alfons (37)
05/09 Coronafix (52)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Fire extinguisher as high pressure tank?

1 2 
Move Thread LAN_403
j.azz
Tue Sept 30 2008, 02:35PM Print
j.azz Registered Member #888 Joined: Tue Jul 10 2007, 06:52PM
Location: Hannover, Germany
Posts: 40
Hi folks!

I've got an (older) portable CO2 fire extinguisher that I want to use as a high pressure air tank.
It's burst plate is rated at 250Bar (kg/cm^2), the tank itself is tested up to 950Bar. As I found on the internet, the operating pressure is about 70Bar at room temperature.

Now my question is:
Up to which pressure can I use it? Will the original valve held as much as the tank?
Can I go above the rating of the burst plate if I remove it?

thx in advance, j.azz
Back to top
Dr. Slack
Tue Sept 30 2008, 03:10PM
Dr. Slack Registered Member #72 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:29AM
Location: UK St. Albans
Posts: 1659
If you remove the burst plate, then the tank will only be able to go up to 0 bar. wink

However if you replace the burst plate with something stronger, then you'll have a system suitable for the iterative capacity measurement method, which runs roughly thus - Increase pressure (voltage, current, power input, borrowings against bad mortgages) until it goes bang (bursts into flames, economy collapses), then back off a bit.

As a tip, test it hydarulically, rather than pneumatically. A failure at 950bar with water will result in a fright. A 950 bar failure with air will take out most of the neighbourhood.
Back to top
j.azz
Tue Sept 30 2008, 03:31PM
j.azz Registered Member #888 Joined: Tue Jul 10 2007, 06:52PM
Location: Hannover, Germany
Posts: 40
Ok. With saying removing the burst plate I thought of replacing it ;)
As I heard these fire ext. tanks are coated internally against corrosion from the CO2, so the iron won't be harmed by water either, right?
Guess I'll try that as soon as I get a suitable pressure supply.
But as I only have this one, I'll need another one that works after the test,
is there someone in Germany who sells me an old CO2 fire ext. up to 2litres CO2?

thx, j.azz
Back to top
Steve Conner
Tue Sept 30 2008, 04:18PM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
It all depends on how much risk you want to take, bearing in mind that the energy released in an explosion would be similar to a couple of hand grenades.

If it was to be used near people without any shielding, then the 250 bar rating of the burst disc is what counts. (Even 250 bar is a heck of a lot of pressure.)

For short-term experimental use, you might be able to go up to, say, half the test pressure of the tank, but you wouldn't want to hang out near it for long.

Exploding one tank would probably not be a reliable source of data. There are variations in manufacture, and things happen to them after they leave the factory.

Of course this post is provided without any warranty and I disclaim all responsibility for any damage or injury you might suffer, which is likely to be gruesome Link2
Back to top
ragnar
Tue Sept 30 2008, 04:27PM
ragnar Registered Member #63 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 06:18AM
Location:
Posts: 1425
I'm quite sure they have some kind of pressure relief valve anyway?
Back to top
aonomus
Tue Sept 30 2008, 08:00PM
aonomus Registered Member #1497 Joined: Thu May 22 2008, 05:24AM
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 801
I think they do hydrostatic testing on fire extinguisher tanks. They submerge the tank into water, and fill the tank with water and increase the pressure until the test rating. Any failure will result in little/no shrapnel iirc...
Back to top
Sync
Tue Sept 30 2008, 08:02PM
Sync Registered Member #510 Joined: Sat Feb 10 2007, 09:28AM
Location: Hannover
Posts: 12
Thats what the burstplate ist for... And yes they are coated with some paint inside..

Und ich geh schonmal in Deckung wenn du das Teil ansteckst...
Back to top
rp181
Tue Sept 30 2008, 11:52PM
rp181 Registered Member #1062 Joined: Tue Oct 16 2007, 02:01AM
Location:
Posts: 1529
whats it for?
Back to top
Dragon64
Wed Oct 01 2008, 12:02AM
Dragon64 Registered Member #1438 Joined: Sat Apr 12 2008, 12:57AM
Location: Canada
Posts: 218
Matt Bingham wrote ...

I'm quite sure they have some kind of pressure relief valve anyway?

He is right, there is a automatic pressure release valve in fire extinguisher as a safty feature.

Mythbuster tried to burst a fire extinguisher in a camp fire but never did because the safty valve opened releasing all the gas.
Back to top
Dr. Slack
Wed Oct 01 2008, 07:08AM
Dr. Slack Registered Member #72 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:29AM
Location: UK St. Albans
Posts: 1659
But as I only have this one, I'll need another one that works after the test,


Unfortunately, failing one tank only tells you about that one tank, so you can't assume anything about any others. That's why there's a difference between the test pressure (which tells you that the tank stood that pressure once, before it was knocked about or suffered corrosion), the burst disk pressure, and the operating pressure.

If you're a mnaufacturer, and you make a whole bunch of tanks from the same batch of material, then you can start quoting pressures for ones you haven't tested to destruction.

If you test one to destruction, and buy a "similar" one and expect it to behave the same way, at the extreme end of its range where it's not designed to work ...
Back to top
1 2 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.