Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 24
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
No birthdays today

Next birthdays
07/09 Avi (41)
07/09 Jannick Hagen (15)
07/10 Sparcz (69)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: High Voltage
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Using Transistors in Series

Move Thread LAN_403
Firefox
Mon Aug 11 2008, 08:02AM Print
Firefox Registered Member #1389 Joined: Thu Mar 13 2008, 12:50AM
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 346
I have been reading up on switching power supplies and a question popped into my head that didnt seem to be answered anywhere else. I know the practice of paralleling switches is common and that transistors share current well if they are kept at even temperatures, assuming they are the same transistor. But what if you need more voltage at the same current? Can you use multiple IGBTs or MOSFETs in series to get the desired voltage, and might switching topology (hard switched PWM vs. ZVS/ZCS) make a difference in this answer?
Back to top
Steve Ward
Mon Aug 11 2008, 08:25AM
Steve Ward Registered Member #146 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 04:21AM
Location: Austin Tx
Posts: 1055
It does exist. Probably the safest route to go is ZVS switching. The reason being that you have a wider window before the collector voltage is higher than the rating of any single device.

So just like ZCS is nice for paralleling devices, ZVS is nice for seriesing them, and the reason is simply that it provides a wider window for the transitions to take place before any single device gets blasted with excessive current or voltage.

Hard switching is tough for series devices, because even nS timing can be critical. I think the schemes ive seen put TVS diodes or MOVs across each device to briefly take over if it doesnt turn on in time. Not a desirable option.
Back to top
quicksilver
Mon Aug 11 2008, 01:47PM
quicksilver Registered Member #1408 Joined: Fri Mar 21 2008, 03:49PM
Location: Oracle, AZ
Posts: 679
I've wondered this very same thing....
If I understand, what you're saying is that the design would always be primary in this concept?

My original thinking was that the reason the 2N3055 drivers were such a failure was that they reduced them to one unit...(?) I had thought that the original designs using two 2N3055's brought the needed levels to the deign (via multiple units) but you're saying that would not be the case: that circuit design is primary?
Back to top
Firefox
Mon Aug 11 2008, 06:27PM
Firefox Registered Member #1389 Joined: Thu Mar 13 2008, 12:50AM
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 346
Aren't ZCS and ZVS the almost the same thing? I mean, you cannot have ZCS without ZVS, because if there was a potential difference, current would want to flow (V=IR), correct?
Back to top
Myke
Mon Aug 11 2008, 07:00PM
Myke Registered Member #540 Joined: Mon Feb 19 2007, 07:49PM
Location: MIT
Posts: 969
With an inductor, the current lags behind the voltage and with a capacitor, the current leads the voltage. Is this right or did I switch it?
Back to top
Dr. Dark Current
Mon Aug 11 2008, 07:11PM
Dr. Dark Current Registered Member #152 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 03:36PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 3384
Firefox wrote ...

Aren't ZCS and ZVS the almost the same thing? I mean, you cannot have ZCS without ZVS, because if there was a potential difference, current would want to flow (V=IR), correct?
The problem is tha zcs is never perfectly zcs, even a little current always flows. And this is enough to force the full voltage across very high impedance switch in off state. That said, most today MOSFets even IGBTs are avalanche rated, so seriesing them should not present very big problems.


Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.