Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 26
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
gentoo_daemon (43)


Next birthdays
04/20 gentoo_daemon (43)
04/21 kilovolt (50)
04/21 wannabegeekTC (50)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Chatting
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Ethics of sampling parts?

1 2 
Move Thread LAN_403
aonomus
Sat Aug 09 2008, 11:07PM Print
aonomus Registered Member #1497 Joined: Thu May 22 2008, 05:24AM
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 801
So I recently put in a sample request which was a stretch, with a legitimate reason (ie: develop an induction heater for use in solid state chemistry). The only bit that still bothers me about it is even though I only requested 8 parts, those 8 parts surprisingly totaled almost $100......

What I'm wondering is if anyone else feels oddly unsettled, or if its 'wrong'? I ask because one of my friends has been laying on the guilt because she thinks that I should pay for every single part...
Back to top
Hon1nbo
Sat Aug 09 2008, 11:27PM
Hon1nbo Registered Member #902 Joined: Sun Jul 15 2007, 08:17PM
Location: Pacific Northwest USA
Posts: 1042
I think it depends, like do you already know how these parts will work? Then if you get more of them (if they hold up to or exceed your expectations) will you pay for those like normal?
f it is for developing a device from these parts, and you intend to try them against other things, I think it is fine: it is when you only intend to use those parts, and not try anything else or after the parts have proved themselves and you use samples again that it is bad (in which case, I don't think they would send anymore anyways)...

EDIT: Just curios, what were the parts?
Back to top
Shaun
Sun Aug 10 2008, 12:40AM
Shaun Registered Member #690 Joined: Tue May 08 2007, 03:47AM
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 616
Link2

This topic was debated to death here^. And this thread is likely to be locked.

<soapbox> Assuming sampling is for finding out whether or not a certain part will work in your application, NOBODY here should be sampling 942Cs. Its extremely well documented what kind of miracles those caps can work. Judging by price, I don't think that's what you are sampling, though. So sample away; it won't put the amateur community farther in the hole for sampling the same capacitor over and over again. </soapbox>
Back to top
aonomus
Sun Aug 10 2008, 12:48AM
aonomus Registered Member #1497 Joined: Thu May 22 2008, 05:24AM
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 801
I'm not sure these parts would 'work', work being able to withstand some accidental removal of the workpiece from the coil (which typically causes the semiconductors to go 'poof'). I suppose if I ever made more of the design I would pay for them....

The parts were 4 MOSFETs, 2 IGBTs and 2 SOT227 diodes that *should* be able to withstand some numpty undergrad pulling out a metal crucible from the work coil before powering down.... I was skeptical that I would ever have the samples approved and was awestruck when I got a email reply with the package tracking number...
Back to top
Myke
Sun Aug 10 2008, 01:03AM
Myke Registered Member #540 Joined: Mon Feb 19 2007, 07:49PM
Location: MIT
Posts: 969
I personally would only sample a max of 10 of the same item then buy the rest. If you know the part works for your application, I think you should spend the money.
Back to top
aonomus
Sun Aug 10 2008, 01:11AM
aonomus Registered Member #1497 Joined: Thu May 22 2008, 05:24AM
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 801
I only sampled what I needed.... I suppose I should have kept my mouth shut and told my friend to not mind it....
Back to top
Dago
Sun Aug 10 2008, 10:50AM
Dago Registered Member #538 Joined: Sun Feb 18 2007, 08:33PM
Location: Finland
Posts: 181
In my opinion the companies are giving out free samples to advertise their products and even if I'm not using them for a commercial product it still raises my awareness about the products (for possible future commercial use) and makes me think positively about the company ie. the advertising has succeeded.
Back to top
uzzors2k
Sun Aug 10 2008, 11:03AM
uzzors2k Registered Member #95 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 04:57PM
Location: Norway
Posts: 1308
aonomus wrote ...

I'm not sure these parts would 'work', work being able to withstand some accidental removal of the workpiece from the coil (which typically causes the semiconductors to go 'poof').

Dude, that's what electronic control systems are for! tongue If you're building a device worth 100 bucks just in silicon at least spend a toonie on some op-amps and discretes for the protecting the thing.
Back to top
Steve Conner
Sun Aug 10 2008, 12:02PM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
Yes, being able to withstand a loss of workpiece is a control problem. Your solution is like designing car engines to rev to 18,000rpm to protect them against accidental flooring of the gas with the transmission in neutral, when what you really need is an electronic "rev limiter".

If you really wanted a solution in the power domain, then I could think of plenty worse solutions than just connecting a toaster oven or ballast choke in series with the mains supply.

As for sampling ethics, if the company thought you were being unethical, surely they'd just refuse to send the samples smile I think Dago's comment more or less sums it up, and they'll send the samples if they think you're the sort of person whose awareness is worth raising, ie, somebody who might go on to work in the electronics industry, such as an EE student.
Back to top
HV Enthusiast
Sun Aug 10 2008, 04:52PM
HV Enthusiast Registered Member #15 Joined: Thu Feb 02 2006, 01:11PM
Location:
Posts: 3068
Regarding sampling, those $100.00 worth of parts are just a drop in the bucket. The shelf cost for the general public might be $100.00, but the actual cost is probably on the order of a few bucks, and the development and gross profits only come from the biggest OEM users who end up buying 10's to 100's of millions worth of parts.

Where i work in the defense industry, our production quantities might be between 5-10 units over 10 years and use only about $100.00 total of a particular IC. You think they are making money from us? Think again. Most military programs are similarily like this. Most the money is made in the commercial world.

Also, almost any rep will send you free samples, even if you tell them its for an educational project. Just be honest and you'll be surprised how responsive they are.
Back to top
1 2 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.