Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 42
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Mathias (41)
slash128v6 (52)


Next birthdays
02/01 Barry (70)
02/01 Snowcat (37)
02/01 wylie (43)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Tesla Coils
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Would splitting your primary tank cap work...?

Move Thread LAN_403
Dylan
Fri Jul 25 2008, 12:04AM Print
Dylan Registered Member #1024 Joined: Sun Sept 23 2007, 10:56AM
Location: Northern NSW, Australia
Posts: 95
I'm wondering , in a full bridge configuration, would this work, or have I been smoking the wrong stuff again?

Instead of having a primary tank like:

FB1---Tank MMC Cap---Primary coil---FB2

Split the tank cap in 2 and have:

FB1---1/2 Tank MMC Cap---Primary coil---1/2 Tank MMC Cap---FB2

I ask mainly because it would tidy up my bridge layout a lot.
Back to top
HV Enthusiast
Fri Jul 25 2008, 02:52AM
HV Enthusiast Registered Member #15 Joined: Thu Feb 02 2006, 01:11PM
Location:
Posts: 3068
yes, that would work fine.
Back to top
Andyman
Fri Jul 25 2008, 08:31PM
Andyman Registered Member #1083 Joined: Mon Oct 29 2007, 06:16PM
Location: Upland, California
Posts: 256
Thats called an equi-drive configuration and is perfectly functional. If I remember correctly, that's actually the way Tesla preferred his setup. I've also heard that using that config allows a more pure ring-down of the primary circuit.
Back to top
Dylan
Sat Jul 26 2008, 12:08AM
Dylan Registered Member #1024 Joined: Sun Sept 23 2007, 10:56AM
Location: Northern NSW, Australia
Posts: 95
Excellent, thanks people.
Will post expressPCB files when I'm done.
Will be a nice, symetrical, hopefully low inductance TO-3P fullbridge layout.
Back to top
Steve Ward
Sat Jul 26 2008, 05:05AM
Steve Ward Registered Member #146 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 04:21AM
Location: Austin Tx
Posts: 1055
FYI, Kirchoff's current law says it doesn't matter what order the L's and C's are in... in fact you could break your primary into multiple segments with capacitors in series with them (provided the mutual coupling between windings was not effected). All that matters is that to total ESL and ESC (did i just make that up? equivalent series capacitance) are the same as the lumped model where you have just 1 L and 1 C.

I never understood this BS about equidrive giving some sort of advantage. I have yet to hear a credible explanation, other than "Tesla said so".
Back to top
Mathias
Sat Jul 26 2008, 10:44AM
Mathias Registered Member #1381 Joined: Fri Mar 07 2008, 05:24PM
Location: Hungary
Posts: 74
Would this configuration work in a drsstc ? But i think as steve pointed out , it should not give any sort of advantage.
Maybe it would just ad more to total ESL cause of additional wires :P
Back to top
Marko
Sat Jul 26 2008, 03:11PM
Marko Registered Member #89 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 02:40PM
Location: Zadar, Croatia
Posts: 3145
Steve Ward wrote ...

FYI, Kirchoff's current law says it doesn't matter what order the L's and C's are in... in fact you could break your primary into multiple segments with capacitors in series with them (provided the mutual coupling between windings was not effected). All that matters is that to total ESL and ESC (did i just make that up? equivalent series capacitance) are the same as the lumped model where you have just 1 L and 1 C.

I never understood this BS about equidrive giving some sort of advantage. I have yet to hear a credible explanation, other than "Tesla said so".

Meh, the only advantage I could ever see is that you would block DC from the primary and thus reduce the shock hazard from it... still that would be a poor excuse for touching the primary in any case.

If it's easy to do I'd go for it, as there's nothing to lose in any case.

Sometimes I'd prefer it (if I have 2 DC blocking caps of 250V, I'd rather put each of them onto other H bridge leg than both in series on one leg. )

Marko
Back to top
GeordieBoy
Sat Jul 26 2008, 07:39PM
GeordieBoy Registered Member #1232 Joined: Wed Jan 16 2008, 10:53PM
Location: Doon tha Toon!
Posts: 881
>...the only advantage I could ever see is that you would block DC from the primary and thus reduce the shock hazard from it... still that would be a poor excuse for touching the primary in any case.

Blocking DC from getting off the primary could actually create a shock hazard if charge remains in the two equi-drive capacitors at the end of a run - Always use bleeder resistors!
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.