Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 104
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
RateReducer (35)


Next birthdays
11/02 Download (31)
11/02 ScottH (37)
11/03 Electroguy (94)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Tesla Oscillator

1 2 
Move Thread LAN_403
Tesla C
Wed Jun 18 2008, 06:27PM Print
Tesla C Registered Member #1551 Joined: Wed Jun 18 2008, 06:21PM
Location:
Posts: 7
Okay so has anyone ever built a tesla oscillator? I have looked for plans on building it but could not find anything, anyone know?

Thanks
Back to top
Experimentonomen
Wed Jun 18 2008, 07:51PM
Experimentonomen Registered Member #941 Joined: Sun Aug 05 2007, 10:09AM
Location: in a swedish junk pile
Posts: 497
The mythbuters tried but failed, apparently tesla used a pneumatic/engine driven jackhammer, however the mythbusters ended up using a linear electric servo motor, with a weight attached to it to get any effect at all, and still it wasent even close to tesla´s claim of almost bringing a building down.
Back to top
Coronafix
Wed Jun 18 2008, 11:08PM
Coronafix Registered Member #160 Joined: Mon Feb 13 2006, 02:07AM
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 938
The fact that Mythbusters failed isn't really saying much.
Tesla's mechanical oscillator I believe was based on his patent for his reciprocating engine.
It would not be enough though to simply build it then set about bringing down buildings.
You would need to know the frequency with which to vibrate the building at.
Because with resonance, the effect is not immediately seen, it needs to build up over several cycles.
I think that Tesla would have done his math before attempting his building vibration trick.
As with a swing, even a small push can be built into a big swing given the timing and position of the
next push.
Back to top
Tesla C
Thu Jun 19 2008, 01:35AM
Tesla C Registered Member #1551 Joined: Wed Jun 18 2008, 06:21PM
Location:
Posts: 7
Well I never thought of actually taking down a building with it. I just got a few ideas now at how to start. Any more help is welcome.
Back to top
Bjørn
Thu Jun 19 2008, 02:12AM
Bjørn Registered Member #27 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 02:20AM
Location: Hyperborea
Posts: 2058
Ignore Tesla and Mythbusters. Read about mechanical resonance and damping, that should get you on the right track.
Back to top
Hon1nbo
Thu Jun 19 2008, 02:13AM
Hon1nbo Registered Member #902 Joined: Sun Jul 15 2007, 08:17PM
Location: North Texas
Posts: 1040
also in the mythbuster's tests, they tried it on structures that are designed to have the least likely chance of having a destructive harmonic frequency within that which the mythbusters could have made with that thing... and their "small scale test" of Tesla's building was not good at all, as the steel skeleton design of buildings was not around at that time... the walls bear the load then
Back to top
Fraggle
Fri Jun 20 2008, 12:40AM
Fraggle Registered Member #1526 Joined: Mon Jun 09 2008, 12:56AM
Location: UK
Posts: 216
It`s clearly possible to make things, even buildings, resonate. The only question is; how to get a sufficiently large mass oscillating with enough amplitude to do anything interesting AND allow the frequency to be adjusted?
Back to top
Steve Ward
Fri Jun 20 2008, 04:40AM
Steve Ward Registered Member #146 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 04:21AM
Location: Austin Tx
Posts: 1055
Dont forget that resonant objects have a Q, and for most things its pretty low, meaning you will never store more than a few times as much energy in the resonant object than you store in your driver.

I personally dont believe it would work on any decent structure, unless of course your driver was a good fraction of the size of the building.
Back to top
Marko
Fri Jun 20 2008, 12:59PM
Marko Registered Member #89 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 02:40PM
Location: Zadar, Croatia
Posts: 3145
Bjørn Bæverfjord wrote ...

Ignore Tesla and Mythbusters. Read about mechanical resonance and damping, that should get you on the right track.

Yes, Mythbusters had some grave misunderstandings - like measuring the fundamental resonant frequency of a steel bar hanging in air (which was actually in kHz and had nothing to do with resonant frequency of structures it may be used in), then trying to *break* it by a small vibrator operating at no more than few tens of Hz??, or, waiting for hours for resonance to ''build up'' on a very low Q system, where it actually does in first few cycles, and etc.

They are not to be considered as scientific evidence but I'm sure they would be happy to revisit and correct their mistakes if someone guides them into it.



About the whole earthquake machine thing I only know anecdotal tales and not really much concrete evidence about anything. I can't really comment on whether Tesla has done it or not, but someone can investigate basic possibility of the very thing;

Mythbusters have for example set the goal as 'could Tesla have created a small machine which would produce an earthquake-like effect in a building'.

Power input, type of building and even the size of the machine seem completely undefined though, which makes any concrete investigation hard.
Mass of the machine is not defined either, and a large reciprocating mass may be beneficial in some cases.

If I had to 'bust or prove a myth', there are many things that could be done.

- Define what is to be called an ''earthquake effect'', or whatever - some threshold of vibration amplitude must be stated.

- there's no obvious limit in power supply nor type of power input. Having a huge boiler providing a few tens of kW worth of steam is obvious advantage, and it's not a part of machine. But even that may not be needed. Size of device doesn't really matter alone, it's the *power input* and *Q* that matter.

- No information on the duration of effect or necessity of permanent destruction to prove ''earthquake effect''. So probably a tank of compressed air may be just enough to provide high peak power for short time.

-Finally the type of building I would want to use is one with weak damping, high rise construction of probably some old design. Heavily damped structures like truss bridges are apparently poor choices.






Back to top
Mates
Fri Jun 20 2008, 04:12PM
Mates Registered Member #1025 Joined: Sun Sept 23 2007, 07:53PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 566
I saw a damaged building by turning-lathe which got out of control at so called critical rotation speed. Massive piece of concrete was pulled out from the floor (the turning-lathe platform) and there were raptures in the concrete spreading meters away. Guys working there that day said the whole building was shaking... So, I think it is possible to make earthquake effect by some kind of vibrator, but I doubt it could be in the range of pocket size...

Another experience I have with a large subwoofer (400W, 50cm diameter membrane) fixed inside a metal barrel hooked to signal generator. By gentle tuning at high power in low freq. you can shake with different things in the room. It is a lot of fun and cool way to study the higher harmonics… wink
Back to top
1 2 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.