Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 44
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
MicroTesla (34)


Next birthdays
07/09 Avi (41)
07/09 Jannick Hagen (15)
07/10 Sparcz (69)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: High Voltage
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

helicopter static charge

Move Thread LAN_403
GeordieBoy
Thu Jun 19 2008, 12:55PM
GeordieBoy Registered Member #1232 Joined: Wed Jan 16 2008, 10:53PM
Location: Doon tha Toon!
Posts: 881
My guess would be that charged particles in the air collect on the surface of the glass, (which is an insulator) until such point as surface tracking occurs and the charge is dissipated to the surrounding metal.
Back to top
DrZoidberg
Thu Jun 19 2008, 03:32PM
DrZoidberg Registered Member #350 Joined: Mon Mar 27 2006, 05:14PM
Location:
Posts: 106
My guess is I couldn't detect any current because it was less then 0.1 nA. I read a helicopter needs a while to get charged. So the charging current is quite low. If you consider the much smaller surface and the much smaller air speed in my experiment the current was probably only a few pA.

Dave Marshall wrote ...

Perhaps one of the simplest and easiest (precautions must be taken) involves coating a razor blade with a mildly radioactive material like Thorium ash from lantern mantles (or Americium-231 *if precautions are taken*). The physics of this are somewhat vague to me but my understanding is you create a small area of ionized air around the razor blade's edge, which increases the effective aperture size. Sort of inflating the razor blade to extend across a more substantial bit of the electrical gradient.

If I lived in the US I would just get some polonium 210 from amazon (search for "staticmaster" to find it). This stuff is extremely radioactive. But it's just alpha radiation so it's relatively harmless. You get 500 microcuries for 20$. The americium from a smoke detector is only 0.9 microcuries
Back to top
Antonio
Sun Jun 22 2008, 02:43AM
Antonio Registered Member #834 Joined: Tue Jun 12 2007, 10:57PM
Location: Brazil
Posts: 644
The classical way of getting charge from the atmosphere is by using flames. This is being done since the 1700´s. There is no need of radioactive materials. Instead of trying to measure tiny currents, use a sensitive electroscope and see the accumulated charge on it.
Interesting the comments about helicopters becoming charged. Note that helicopters are sometimes used in the maintenance of live high-voltage transmission lines, and in this case they are directly connected to several hundreds of kV, and surely get a very significant charge.
Link2
Back to top
Hon1nbo
Sun Jun 22 2008, 04:07AM
Hon1nbo Registered Member #902 Joined: Sun Jul 15 2007, 08:17PM
Location: Pacific Northwest USA
Posts: 1042
DrZoidberg wrote ...

My guess is I couldn't detect any current because it was less then 0.1 nA. I read a helicopter needs a while to get charged. So the charging current is quite low. If you consider the much smaller surface and the much smaller air speed in my experiment the current was probably only a few pA.

Dave Marshall wrote ...

Perhaps one of the simplest and easiest (precautions must be taken) involves coating a razor blade with a mildly radioactive material like Thorium ash from lantern mantles (or Americium-231 *if precautions are taken*). The physics of this are somewhat vague to me but my understanding is you create a small area of ionized air around the razor blade's edge, which increases the effective aperture size. Sort of inflating the razor blade to extend across a more substantial bit of the electrical gradient.

If I lived in the US I would just get some polonium 210 from amazon (search for "staticmaster" to find it). This stuff is extremely radioactive. But it's just alpha radiation so it's relatively harmless. You get 500 microcuries for 20$. The americium from a smoke detector is only 0.9 microcuries

it is very difficult however to get any where the radiation has not gone away (polonium has a VERY short half life

also, the lantern mantles method works, but not well as the blade can pick up the charge from the alpha, to an extent that is... I have a thread on something similar in chemistry...
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.