Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 65
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Mathias (41)
slash128v6 (52)


Next birthdays
02/01 Barry (70)
02/01 Snowcat (37)
02/01 wylie (43)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Tesla Coils
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Upgrade of my high power single switch SSTC

Move Thread LAN_403
Mates
Sun Jun 08 2008, 08:21AM Print
Mates Registered Member #1025 Joined: Sun Sept 23 2007, 07:53PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 566
I simplified the design (it is powered straight by non-rectified 220V AC mains) and increased the power of my single switch…


1212912784 1025 FT0 Scheme


How it works:
It employs three BUP314 Link2 transistors in parallel switched by TL494 followed by UCC37322/1 gate drive and GDT. The resonant frequency of the coil is 380KHz. The coil works in Class E and to achieve Class E at 2.5KW which the coil sucks from the wall needs a special trick. The PW of the switch pulses is very short (only 1us) and the switching frequency is only half the resonant frequency (180KHz). Big advantage of this concept is that through the opened transistor the C1 is discharged into the primary and this discharge has a very short peak (most of the energy goes within first 300ns). Thus, the turn off time of the transistors is not longer an issue and relatively slow IGBT type of transistor can be easily used. Such ultra short pulses are relatively easy to place to the zero voltage transitions of the L1/C2 resonator by simple tuning of the coil (at low input voltage). The huge C3 capacitor works as a non-inductive current limiter with very low resistance. It basically determines the AMP peak of the C1 discharge. The C3 is made of many PP capacitors (used in asynchronous motors) and by connecting and disconnecting some of the caps the power of the coil can be regulated.

Here is the video of the coil in action… Link2

Comments welcomed

1212913121 1025 FT0 Pulses


Red - secondary waves
Black - driving pulses

BTW: Would be great if somebody could help me to solve a feedback for this coil - I'm sure it would increase the spark lenght...
Back to top
Steve Conner
Sun Jun 08 2008, 10:31AM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
Looks like you reinvented the OLTC with an extra capacitor. suprised
Back to top
Mates
Sun Jun 08 2008, 12:21PM
Mates Registered Member #1025 Joined: Sun Sept 23 2007, 07:53PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 566
Dr. Conner wrote ...

Looks like you reinvented the OLTC with an extra capacitor. suprised

I don’t understand where you see similarities with an OLTC concept. I checked all the OLTC schemes on the internet and the only similarity I see, is that they are also connected to the wall plug-in.
The OLTC concept as I understand it is a substitution of a spark gap a by a semiconductor. It means that the switch device is in parallel to the L/C. Next, the power source for a common OLTC is rectified mains with some kind of current limiter (a choke or transformer). The driving pulses for the OLTC transistor are completely unrelated to the resonant frequency of the coil, usually kept in low bps rate. None of these features are part of my coil – so why is it OLTC for you? suprised

My coil has a transistor in series with primary and is in parallel with the resonant cap (class E concept). As a power source I use non-rectified mains and the driving pulses are exactly 1/2 of the resonant frequency of the coil (In case I’m out of tune, no or very little sparks appear).

9 Copy

5 Copy
Back to top
Arcstarter
Mon Jun 09 2008, 04:45AM
Arcstarter Registered Member #1225 Joined: Sat Jan 12 2008, 01:24AM
Location: Beaumont, Texas, USA
Posts: 2253
Wow, Great coil! I think i will buy some igbts and other junk and make this. Thanks!
Back to top
GeordieBoy
Mon Jun 09 2008, 12:36PM
GeordieBoy Registered Member #1232 Joined: Wed Jan 16 2008, 10:53PM
Location: Doon tha Toon!
Posts: 881
Just to avoid confusion, this circuit is not operating like a Class-E RF amplifier. If anything it is operating closer to a Class-C frequency doubler.

Class-E operation is characterised by a damped sinusoidal voltage waveform, where the switch turns on at zero-voltage and with zero-current.

Some info including waveshapes here:

Link2

-Richie,
Back to top
uzzors2k
Mon Jun 09 2008, 02:21PM
uzzors2k Registered Member #95 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 04:57PM
Location: Norway
Posts: 1308
Looking good Mates, and interesting driving scheme.
Back to top
Mates
Mon Jun 09 2008, 02:42PM
Mates Registered Member #1025 Joined: Sun Sept 23 2007, 07:53PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 566
GeordieBoy wrote ...

Just to avoid confusion, this circuit is not operating like a Class-E RF amplifier. If anything it is operating closer to a Class-C frequency doubler.

Class-E operation is characterised by a damped sinusoidal voltage waveform, where the switch turns on at zero-voltage and with zero-current.

Some info including waveshapes here:

Link2

-Richie,

Thanks for the link and the Class comment...
I do not understand the Class C - how it works, whether it has also a resonant cap or not. Still, I believe the signal is actually damped - you can even see it on the osciloscope picture. The only thing which is different from classical classE operation is that I switch every second wave. I also tried to switch every negative wave (this means the full resonant frequency of the coil). It worked very well, but only two seconds - than I destroyed one of the transistors so I went back to the safe waters of the resonant freq/2 (BTW: paralleling of the transistors have the big advantage that you destroy only one, in case you make some mistake. The bridge design is never so generous...).

Any idea about the feedback for this coil?


Back to top
GeordieBoy
Mon Jun 09 2008, 04:34PM
GeordieBoy Registered Member #1232 Joined: Wed Jan 16 2008, 10:53PM
Location: Doon tha Toon!
Posts: 881
Feedback will be a challenge if you have to drive it at f/2 !
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.