Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 24
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
No birthdays today

Next birthdays
06/27 JLaz (30)
06/28 Alessandro (32)
06/28 Andrew L. (33)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Electromagnetic Projectile Accelerators
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Railgun begginings and questions

 1 2 3 4 
Move Thread LAN_403
phil
Mon Jun 09 2008, 11:45AM
phil Registered Member #314 Joined: Mon Mar 13 2006, 03:12AM
Location:
Posts: 52
True, it was just a representation not the actual projectile. I calculated that i'll be getting 60J out of those capacitors. Even at 10% efficiency thats still 240Ft/s... basically the speed of a paint ball gun. That render you see a few posts above has about 3 turns per inch, i'd probably go with .5 turns per inch.
Back to top
OZZY
Mon Jun 09 2008, 12:53PM
OZZY Registered Member #511 Joined: Sat Feb 10 2007, 11:36AM
Location: Somerset UK
Posts: 55
Phil wrote:
I calculated that i'll be getting 60J out of those capacitors. Even at 10% efficiency thats still 240Ft/s... basically the speed of a paint ball gun.
Did you mean 600J, I make it 591J. 10% is very optimistic, very few railguns have done better than 2%. Even 600J is very low power for a railgun with 1/2" bore, successful railguns this size use 10 times as much energy! I would concentrate on getting the railgun to work first and worry about stabilizing the projectile after.
Back to top
ea6b607
Mon Jun 09 2008, 03:16PM
ea6b607 Registered Member #1320 Joined: Sat Feb 16 2008, 01:31AM
Location:
Posts: 67
If you have 60 of those I would suggest using as many as possible. I had 5Kj on mine which had a 1/2" bore, and I still felt that I should have put more power into it. Most around that bore have 15-30KJ. BTW all 60 of those capacitors are only 2.5KJ.
Back to top
Andyman
Mon Jun 09 2008, 07:16PM
Andyman Registered Member #1083 Joined: Mon Oct 29 2007, 06:16PM
Location: Upland, California
Posts: 256
I don't think that rifling on the projectile will do a whole lot. If you get sufficient power, the projectile will nearly vaporize and the rifling will melt away within the first few inches of the barrel. It would be more effective in a coilgun.
Back to top
rp181
Mon Jun 09 2008, 10:01PM
rp181 Registered Member #1062 Joined: Tue Oct 16 2007, 02:01AM
Location:
Posts: 1529
ide say try a mini version thats round just to make sure it works. I think it will work, but it wont be as effeciant, since less magnetic fields will interact with the projectile.
Back to top
phil
Mon Jun 09 2008, 11:18PM
phil Registered Member #314 Joined: Mon Mar 13 2006, 03:12AM
Location:
Posts: 52
Yes there was a typo in my above post it should have been 600J. And 2%? thats really disappointing actually. Do you think these capacitor would be more suited for a CG rather then a railgun?
Back to top
ea6b607
Mon Jun 09 2008, 11:32PM
ea6b607 Registered Member #1320 Joined: Sat Feb 16 2008, 01:31AM
Location:
Posts: 67
you should get better then 2%. I'm not sure why everyone has an idea that railguns are so inefficient they usually average from 10-15% with large scale ones such as BAE's having up to 40% the smaller the less efficient generally.
Back to top
rp181
Tue Jun 10 2008, 12:04AM
rp181 Registered Member #1062 Joined: Tue Oct 16 2007, 02:01AM
Location:
Posts: 1529
i say go for multi stage coilgun, unless you want to buy caps, look for ~450v.
Back to top
phil
Tue Jun 10 2008, 12:07AM
phil Registered Member #314 Joined: Mon Mar 13 2006, 03:12AM
Location:
Posts: 52
I was trying to start small being i've only designed these i've never actually built them. Maybe i'll start with a single stage CG using a smaller bank to just get it working. Thanks for the help so far guys =).
Back to top
zephir
Thu Jun 12 2008, 06:29AM
zephir Registered Member #1471 Joined: Tue May 06 2008, 03:17AM
Location: Irvine, California
Posts: 13
finally, someone else who wants to build a rail gun to shoot cylindrical projectiles in place of cubes or boxy ones.

I have the same idea, but to save money and effort, I plan on buying pulled bullets. My first railgun would use the cheapest to get .30 cal M2 ball bullets. Its like 50 bucks for a case of them. That's hundreds and hundreds of full metal jacketed (copper), lead cored bullets that's manufactured with precision ready for reloading or other purposes. That way, you don't need to machine anything as a projectile, and recovery of the projectile isn't a big deal either, just buy another case of pulled bullets.

Since your cap bank is larger than mine, I would advise you to buy larger bullets, like .50 cal M2 ball (FMJ, copper, lead cored, 600 grain) or you get even bigger bullets all the way up to .700 caliber. They're quite a bit more expensive, but at least they won't vaporize on the rails.

AS for twist rate, I think 1 turn in 9 inches would be a good point to start at. For firearms, generally its between 9 and 22 inches per twist. The heavier the bullet, the less twist you need.
Back to top
 1 2 3 4 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.